Degree | Type | Year | Semester |
---|---|---|---|
2500245 English Studies | OT | 3 | 0 |
2500245 English Studies | OT | 4 | 0 |
2500248 Spanish Language and Literature | OT | 3 | 0 |
2500248 Spanish Language and Literature | OT | 4 | 0 |
2501801 Catalan and Spanish | OT | 3 | 0 |
2501801 Catalan and Spanish | OT | 4 | 0 |
2501902 English and Catalan | OT | 3 | 0 |
2501902 English and Catalan | OT | 4 | 0 |
2501907 English and Classics | OT | 3 | 0 |
2501907 English and Classics | OT | 4 | 0 |
2501910 English and Spanish | OT | 3 | 0 |
2501910 English and Spanish | OT | 4 | 0 |
2501913 English and French | OT | 3 | 0 |
2501913 English and French | OT | 4 | 0 |
2503998 Catalan Philology: Literary Studies and Linguistics | OT | 4 | 0 |
2504211 Spanish Language and Literature | OT | 3 | 0 |
2504211 Spanish Language and Literature | OT | 4 | 0 |
2504212 English Studies | OT | 3 | 0 |
2504212 English Studies | OT | 4 | 0 |
Students must be studying a degree related to language.
A selection of issues in comparative grammar will be made from the study of several languages (Romance and non-Romance; Indo-European and non-Indo-European languages) and some of the analyses that have been posited to account for them will be reviewed. Special attention will be paid to Catalan, Spanish, English, and Latin. Secondarily, it is also planned to deal with grammatical aspects of Italian, German, Russian, Greek (ancient and modern), Basque, Chinese, Japanese, i.a.
1. Introduction. Comparative grammar in formal linguistics and functional linguistics. Parameters and linguistic variation in formal grammar
2. Selection of issues in comparative grammar:
2.1. The parametric variation involved in the typological distinction between verb-framed languages and satellite-framed languages. Phrasal verbs and resultative constructions
2.2. The syntactic expression of predication. Primary predication and secondary predication. Argument structure alternations
2.3. Split intransitivity. The grammatical expression of unaccusativity. Unaccusative verbs and deponent verbs
2.4. Passive constructions. Verbal passives and adjectival passives. Participial structures. Absolute constructions
2.5. Word order and information structure. Discourse configurationality
There will be a combination of lectures with some exercises, discussion, and analyses of phenomena.
Annotation: Within the schedule set by the centre or degree programme, 15 minutes of one class will be reserved for students to evaluate their lecturers and their courses or modules through questionnaires.
Title | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|
Type: Directed | |||
Lectures and discussion sessions | 52 | 2.08 | 4, 1 |
Type: Supervised | |||
Programmed mentoring | 15 | 0.6 | 4, 14, 12, 21, 17, 25 |
Type: Autonomous | |||
Autonomous work | 70 | 2.8 | 4, 6, 5, 14, 13, 12, 22, 18 |
The evaluation of the course will be based on the following actvities:
(a) Attendance and active participation in class: 10%
(b) Delivery of two homework exercises: 30%
(c) Delivery of an essay: 10%
(d) Written test: 50%
The minimum grade for passing the course is 5.
In the event that tests or exams cannot be taken onsite, they will be adapted to an online format made available through the UAB’s virtual tools (original weighting will be maintained). Homework, activities and class participation will be carried out through forums, wikis and/or discussion on Teams, etc. Lecturers will ensure that students are able to access these virtual tools, or will offer them feasible alternatives.
Students have the right to resit or make up evaluated work provided they have submitted a minimum of two thirds of the formally assessed work which makes up the final grade and who have an average between 3.5 and 4.9 according to the evaluation criteria. The highest mark that can be obtained in this case is 5.
Activity (a) is of course excluded from resitting.
The dates of course activities and their revision will be announced through Moodle.
A mark of “no avaluable” (N/A Not Assessable) will be awarded if a student fails to hand in more than 25% of the assessed work used to calculate the final mark.
In cases of plagiarism, identity theft and others in an evaluation activity, a mark of ‘0’ will be given. If such a case is detected over more than one of the evaluable activities, the final mark of the course will be ‘0’. In these cases the student does not have the right to resitting or making up work.
Title | Weighting | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
Attendance and active participation in class | 10% | 1 | 0.04 | 2, 14, 13, 12, 15, 16, 21, 17, 19, 23 |
Delivery of exercise 1 | 15% | 2 | 0.08 | 2, 4, 3, 1, 7, 8, 9, 6, 5, 14, 13, 12, 16, 21, 17, 19, 23, 22, 18, 20, 25, 24, 26 |
Delivery of exercise 2 | 15% | 2 | 0.08 | 2, 4, 3, 1, 7, 8, 9, 6, 5, 14, 13, 12, 21, 17, 19, 23, 22, 18, 20, 25, 24, 26 |
Essay | 10% | 5 | 0.2 | 4, 3, 1, 7, 8, 9, 6, 5, 27, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 16, 28, 19, 25, 24, 26 |
Written test | 50% | 3 | 0.12 | 2, 4, 1, 7, 8, 9, 6, 16, 21, 17, 19, 23, 22, 18, 20, 25, 24, 26 |
Essential bibliographical references
Bosque, Ignacio & Violeta Demonte (dir.). (1999). Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española. Madrid: Espasa Calpe - RAE.
Huddleston, Rodney & Geoffrey K. Pullum (2002). The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Oniga, Renato (2014). Latin: A Linguistic Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Panhuis, Dirk (2006). Latin Grammar. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Solà, Joan et al. (dir.). (20082). Gramàtica del català contemporani, vols. 2 & 3. Barcelona: Empúries.
Selected bibliography
Acedo-Matellán, Víctor & Jaume Mateu (2013). “Satellite-framed Latin vs. verb-framed Romance: A syntactic approach”. Probus 25: 227-265.
Acedo Matellán, Víctor & Jaume Mateu (2015). “Parameters and argument structure I: motion predicates and resultatives”. In Antonio Fábregas, Jaume Mateu i Michael Putnam (eds.). Contemporary Linguistic Parameters. 99-122. New York: Bloomsbury.
Alexiadou, Artemis & Elena Anagnostopoulou (2008). “Structuring participles”. In C. B. Chang & H. J. Haynie (eds.). Proceedings of the 26th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, 33-41. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
Bosque, Ignacio & Javier Gutiérrez-Rexach (2009). Fundamentos de sintaxis formal. Madrid: Akal.
Curell Gotor, Hortènsia & Ana Fernández Montraveta (2018). “Syntax. Major constructions”. In Juli Cebrian Puyuelo, Hortènsia Curell Gotor i Ana Fernández Montraveta. ContrastiveLinguistics. Servei de Publicacions de la UOC, Barcelona.
Demonte, Violeta (2016). “Parámetros y variación en la interfaz léxico-sintaxis”. In Ángel J. Gallego (ed.). Perspectivas de sintaxis formal. 391-425. Madrid: Akal. Available at: http://www.lineas.cchs.csic.es/lycc/sites/lineas.cchs.csic.es.lycc/files/variacion_en_la_interfaz_lexico-final-.pdf
Fábregas, Antonio, Jaume Mateu & Michael Putnam (eds.). (2015). Contemporary Linguistic Parameters. New York: Bloomsbury.
Gallego, Ángel J. (2011). “Parameters”. En Cedric Boeckx (ed.). The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Minimalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gallego, Ángel J. (ed.). (2016). Perspectivas de sintaxis formal. Madrid: Akal.
Haspelmath, Martin (2008). “Parametric versus functional explanations of syntactic universals”. In Theresa Biberauer (ed.). The Limits of Syntactic Variation. 75-107. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Previous version available at: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/c4e7/c9087b6885afcfcad4c52a6a249fa8c589a2.pdf?_ga=2.122862156.633722610.1619032416-1317160974.1618497238
Haspelmath, Martin (2010). “Comparative concepts and descriptive categories in crosslinguistic studies”. Language 86(3): 663-687.
Mateu, Jaume (2005). “Arguing our way to the DOR on English resultatives”. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 8: 55-82.
Mateu, Jaume & Gemma Rigau (2010). “Verb-particle constructions in Romance: a lexical-syntactic account”. Probus 22(2): 241-269.
Picallo, Carme (ed.). (2015). Linguistic Variation in theMinimalist Framework. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.
Ramchand, Gillian C. (2013). “Argument structure and argument structure alternations”. In Marcel den Dikken (ed.). The Cambridge Handbook of Generative Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Available at https://gillianramchandblog.files.wordpress.com/2017/08/handbook20gs20ramchand.pdf
Roberts, Ian (ed.). (2016). The Oxford Handbook of Universal Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Snyder, William (2001). “On the nature of syntactic variation: Evidence from complex predicates and complex word-formation”. Language 77: 324-342.
Villalba, Xavier (2019). El orden de palabras en contraste. Madrid: Arco Libros.
Wheeler, Max, Alan Yates & Nicolau Dols (1999). Catalan. A Comprehensive Grammar. London: Routledge.
None.