Degree | Type | Year | Semester |
---|---|---|---|
2500258 Labour Relations | OT | 4 | 0 |
2500786 Law | OT | 4 | 0 |
Go to the table.
Annotation: Within the schedule set by the centre or degree programme, 15 minutes of one class will be reserved for students to evaluate their lecturers and their courses or modules through questionnaires.
Title | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|
Type: Directed | |||
Cases: real and legal text | 18 | 0.72 | 10, 8, 12, 2, 11, 14, 15 |
Cases: resolution | 15 | 0.6 | 8, 2, 11, 15 |
Doing Law documents | 10 | 0.4 | 8, 2, 11 |
Doing abstracts and main messages | 17 | 0.68 | 8, 2, 11, 14 |
Law documents: study | 15 | 0.6 | 8, 12, 2, 11, 14 |
Theory | 27 | 1.08 | 8 |
Type: Autonomous | |||
Study | 42 | 1.68 | 8 |
EVALUATION’S SYSTEM OF THE ACQUISITION OF THE COMPETENCES AND SYSTEM OF QUALIFICATIONS
1. ORDINARY EVALUATION AND QUALIFICATION SYSTEMS: combines the continuous evaluation of practical activities and the resolution of a final theoretical exam.
1.1 Continuous assessment of practical classes.
1.1.1. It requires to deliver the documentation that in each case is required and to solve in the classroom an evaluable activity - a practical case -. It will be passed when a minimum mark of 1.5 points has been obtained. Value: 3 points.
1.1.2. Test of basic theoretical-practical knowledge. It consists of a test in true / false format. Value: 2 points
1.2. Ordinary theoretical final exam.
It will consist of the resolution of 5 questions of objective format: multiple choice test, true / false, fill the gaps with the correct word, all of them related to the matter contained in the subject’s programme. Each of the exam questions will be punctuated from 0 to 1 point. Value: 5 points.
In both 1.1 and 1.2, the wrong answer is half of the correct answer and not answering means subtracting a quarter of the correct one.
To pass this ordinary evaluation system it is necessary to reach in each of the two typologies 50% of the assigned value.
REVIEW:
The review date will be announced on the day of the exam, which will be at least five working days later. It is necessary to request the review upon request via email.
2. REVALUATION:
To access the re-assessment test, you must have been assessed in 2/3 of the indicated activities (in compliance with article 112 ter of the UAB academic regulations).
The re-assessment exam will consist of two parts:
2.1 It will consist of the resolution of 5 questions of objective format: multiple choice test, true / false, fill the gaps with the correct word, all of them related to the matter contained in the subject’s programme. Each of the exam questions will be punctuated from 0 to 1 point. This part of the exam will have a value of 50% of the grade.
2.2 A practical part that will consist of
2.2.1. The resolution duly based on law, of a practical case with the thematic content corresponding to the subject object of examination. For the resolution of this part, it will only be possible to have, as support material, a collection of labour and public employment regulations. VALUE: 3 points.
2.2.2. A test of basic theoretical-practical contents, in true-false format. VALUE 2 POINTS.
In both 2.1 and 2.2 the wrong answer subtracts half of a correct answer, and the answer left blank subtracts one-fourth of a correct answer.
The final grade of the exam will be obtained by averaging the score obtained in both parts. The subject will be passed when each of the two parts of the exam have been passed independently, with a minimum grade of 50%.
REVIEW:
The review date will be announced on the day of the exam, which will be at least five working days later. Request review upon request must be requested via email.
3. EXAM DATES
They will be determined by the Faculty of Law.
4. CALLS
The number of calls is established in the regulations of permanence.
In both the regular final exams and the re-assessment exams, taking and failing or withdrawing after the questions have been communicated means that the call has been spent.
5. - FRAUDULENT CONDUCTS
The student who copies or tries to copy in an exam will have a "0" in the subject and will lose the right to re-assessment. A student who submits a practice in which there is evidence of plagiarism or who cannot justify the arguments of their practice will get a "0" and will receive a warning. In case of repetition of the behaviour the student will fail the subject (0) and will lose the right to second-chance exam.
Title | Weighting | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
Activities for evaluation in cases and normative for resolution | 50 | 4.5 | 0.18 | 1, 10, 8, 9, 3, 12, 4, 5, 13, 2, 7, 6, 11, 14, 15 |
Final exam | 50 | 1.5 | 0.06 | 8, 2, 11, 14 |
PALOMAR OLMEDA, Alberto, Derecho de la Función Pública. Régimen jurídico de los funcionarios públicos, Dykinson, Madrid, last edition.
PALOMAR OLMEDA, Alberto, El nuevo estatuto del empleado público, Thomson-Aranzadi, Cizur Menor, 2007.
SÁNCHEZ MORÓN, Miguel, Derecho de la Función Pública, Tecnos. Madrid, last edition.
No software required.