Degree | Type | Year | Semester |
---|---|---|---|
2500798 Primary Education | OT | 4 | 0 |
This subject is part of the Inclusive Education subject. In the context of the current inclusive school, it is necessary to have a context in which the teacher is an innovator agent and manager of the diversity that eases the transformation of the ordinary school with the aim to increase its capability to attend all the students giving emphasis to students with specific cognitive learning needs.
The two aims to achieve are:
1. Adapt the teaching-learning process to solve the students educational needs in diversity contexts
2. Energize the educational inclusive process in a collaborative context in multiprofesional areas
BLOCK A: SENSORY CAPABILITIES: AUDITION
1. THE DEVELOPMENT OF SENSORY CAPABILITIES: AUDITION
1.1 Neurophysiological and functional bases of the auditory sensory system.
1.2. Conceptualisation of hearing impairment.
2. PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF STUDENTS WITH HEARING DISORDERS
2.1 Perceptual development in the students.
2.2 Communication and language development.
2.3 Cognitive development.
2.4 Personal, emotional and social development.
2.5. The family context.
3. EDUCATIONAL RESPONSES: elements, criteria and guidelines for organizing educational action in a context of inclusive school.
3.1 Assessment of educational needs.
3.2. The process of learning and teaching: curriculum adaptations.
3.3. Methodological strategies: organization of space and time.
3.4. Communication and access to information and learning for inclusion flattering strategies: specific materials
3.5. Role of educational services in the schooling: CREDA
BLOCK B: SENSORY CAPABILITIES: VISION
1. THE DEVELOPMENT OF SENSORY CAPABILITIES: VISION
1.1 Neurophysiological and functional bases of visual sensory system
1.2. Conceptualisation of impaired vision.
2. PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF STUDENTS WITH VISUAL DISORDERS
2.1 Perceptual development in the students.
2.2 Communication and language development.
2.3 Cognitive development.
2.4 Personal, emotional and social development.
2.5. The family context.
3. EDUCATIONAL RESPONSES: elements, criteria and guidelines for organizing educational action in a context of inclusive school.
3.1 Assessment of educational needs.
3.2. The process of learning and teaching: curriculum adaptations.
3.3. Methodological strategies: organization of space and time.
3.4. Communication and access to information and learning for inclusion flattering strategies: specific materials
3.5. Role of educational services in the schooling: CREDV
The methodological approach is the principle of the variety of methodological strategies. It must facilitate active participation and learning of the students. In this sense, online and face to face keynote sessions will arise, and some activities to work in small groups using cooperative learning and self-employment will be strengthened. The teacher has to support students in this methodological approach, providing some resources to mediate their learning process. The tutorials will be considered as a fundamental part in this methodological approach.
Title | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|
Type: Directed | |||
Exposiciones por parte del profesorado de los contenidos y xuestiones básicas del temario. Se realiza con todo el grupo y permite la presentación de los prijncipales contenidos a través de una participación activa y abierta de los estudiantes | 45 | 1.8 | |
Type: Supervised | |||
Mandatory tutoring group, individual and group work are required | 24 | 0.96 | |
Type: Autonomous | |||
Reading theoretical texts, test preparation, preparation and analysis of cases, other activities | 75 | 3 |
The evaluation is continuous and based on a written test that will weigh 50% in the final mark and activities / practical work (50% of the final mark). All evidence must obtain a minimum of 5.
In Primary Education degree, the evaluation of the course work is group while the writing test is individual. Regarding practical activities into class, their assessment can be individual and / or group.
Students who have done a proper monitoring of the course and still remains some unachieved evidence, they will have the opportunity to pass the subject through a final re-evaluation. In this case, the maximum mark will be a 5. In any case, the re-evaluation will be considered to raise the obtained mark.
If any of the evidence is not finally passed, the course will be failed with the failed qualification.
To pass this course, it is necessary that the student shows a good communication skills, both orally and writing in the activities.
The results of the evaluation of each of the evidence will have to be published in the virtual campus within a maximum period of 15 days, and will have to provide a review date within 10 days of its publication.
According to regulations UAB, plagiarism or copying of any work or written test will be penalized with a 0 mark, losing the possibility to re-evaluate it, both an individual work and group (in this case, all members of the group have a 0). If during the performance of an individual class work, teacher considers that a student is trying to copy or discovers any type of document or device not authorized by the faculty, it will be scored with 0 and the course will be failed.
Attendance at the face-to-face sessions is mandatory, the student must attend a minimum of 80%. Otherwise the evaluation will correspond to a NP.
The treatment of individual cases, questions, suggestions, etc., will deal with the teacher. The evaluation of this subject follows the criteria and guidelines for evaluating the Faculty of Education, under the Agreement of Academic Planning Commission April 28, 2011, June 4, 2014 and May 28, 2015.
The assessment date will be on 21st December 2020 and the re-assessment date will be during the week 1st february 2021.The delivery of the course work will be the deadline on the day of the evaluation of the writing test.
Title | Weighting | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
course work and practical activities into the class | 50% | 0 | 0 | 2, 1, 3, 8, 7, 5, 6 |
writing test | 50% | 6 | 0.24 | 2, 8, 4 |
ARNAIZ, P. Y MARTINEZ, R. (1998). Educación infantil y deficiencia visual. Madrid: CSS.
BUENO, J, Y TORO, S. (1994) )(Coord). Deficiencia visual: aspectos psicoeducativos y evolutivos. Archidona:Aljibe.
BUENO, J. Et al. (2000). Niños y niñas con ceguera: recomendaciones para la familia y la escuela. Archidona: Aljibe.
CHECA, F.J. (2000). Aspectos educativos y evolutivos de la deficiencia visual. Madrid: ONCE.
DIAZ-AGUADO, M.J., ROYO, P. Y BARAJA, A. (1995). Programas para favorecer la integracion escolar de niños ciegos: investigación. Madrid: ONCE
FERNÁNDEZ, J. E. (2001). Desafíos didácticos de la lectura braille. Madrid: ONCE
HORTON, K. (1988). La educación de alumnos no videntes en la clase ordinaria. UNESCO. París.
LAFUENTE DE FRUTOS, Á.(COORD.) (2000). Atención temprana a niños con ceguera o deficiencia visual. Madrid:ONCE
LEONHART, M.et al. (1999). Iniciación del lenguaje en niños ciegos: un enfoque preventivo. Madrid: ONCE
NOGUER, A. Y OTROS (2004). Tecnología y discapacidad visual. Madrid: ONCE.
ALONSO, P. y VALMASEDA, M. (1993). "Los sistemas alternativos de comunicación sin ayuda". En Sotillo, M.: Sistemas alternativos de comunicación. Valladolid. Trotta.
ALONSO, P; GUTIERREZ, A; FERNÁNDEZ, A. Y VALMASEDA, M. (1991). Las necesidades educativas especiales del niño con deficiencia auditiva. Madrid. MEC.
HEILING, K. (1999). "La lectura y la escritura en los niños sordos en contextos bilingües. Una experiencia deveinte años de evaluación". En "Lenguaje escrito y sordera". Salamanca. UPS.
LEWIS, V. (1991). Desarrollo y déficit. Ceguera, sordera, déficit motor, síndrome de Down, autismo. Barcelona: Paidós/MEC. .
MARCHESI, A. (1987). El desarrollo cognitivo y lingüístico de los niños sordos. Madrid . Alianza.
MARCHESI, A. (1990). "Comunicación, lenguaje y pensamiento de los niños sordos". En Marchesi, A. ; Coll, C. ; Palacios, J. : Desarrollo Psicológico y Educación. III. Madrid. Alianza Psicología.
RODRIGUEZ SANTOS, J.M (1990). La deficiencia auditiva: un enfoque cognitivo. Salamanca: Departamento de Publicaciones de la Universidad Pontificia de Salamanca.
SILVESTRE, N. (coord.) (1998). Sordera. Comunicación y aprendizaje. Barcelona: Masson. De la Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.
TORRES MONREAL S, (i altres) (1995). Deficiencia auditiva. Aspectos psicoevolutivos y educativos.Archidona: Aljibe