Degree | Type | Year | Semester |
---|---|---|---|
2500261 Education Studies | OB | 4 | 0 |
The Final Year Project (FYP) represents the final module in the degree programme; therefore, students areadvised to enroll in this module only when they are certain they will complete their studies during the year ofenrolment.
To enroll TFG it is required to have achieved at least two thirds of the total ECTS of the whole programme.
The Final Year Project (FYP) must be a project oriented to the development of a basic research or an innovation that is developed in the professional area to the specific area of knowledge student is enrolled. In any case, it must have all the sections of a research work and must serve to emerge the skills and knowledge associated with the degree that has been completed.
The FYP is carried out autonomous, based on a topic agreed with the teaching staff that will supervise its completion.
The final document of the FYP must be different and individual for each student, therefore, it will not be possible to accept works that present any section that is equal to the other work presented. This, however, does not prevent sharing knowledge between students and being part of the research together.
The FYP offers a wide range of topics related to the different areas of degree.
FYP does not have direct teaching activities. That is why the virtual classroom is the space to exchange information between the coordination team and the student, in addition to being the space to submit the various different assessments that are set during the course. It is essential, therefore, that the student consults the virtual classroom periodically, as well as the email address associated with it, to guarantee that they receive all the necessary information to undertake an effective follow-up
FYP contents will depend on the topic chosen. The tutor will offer students guidance on the specific contentsthat are most suited to their chosen topic.The supervised activity consists of two different formats: on the one hand, there are 6 hours of monitoredsessions scheduled from the start (divided into 4 sessions), and which should be carried out by all studentswho are undertaking the FYP Els i les alumnes que estiguin en programes de mobilitat podran realitzar les tutories virtualment.
On the other hand, the student can apply for up to 6hours more of follow up tutorials, which will be agreed upon between the student and the Supervising teachers.
Three different stages can be distinguished in the Bachelor's Degree Final Project in Psychology: an initiationstage during which the work is specified and proposed (workload of approximately 25 hours of student work), adevelopment stage of the work (workload of approximately 75 hours), and an end and closing stageculminating in the presentation of a report and the public defence of the final work (workload of approximately 50 hours).
The FYP process will begin with a plenary session where the general aspects of preparing the TFG will be explained and a round table will be held with students from the previous course.
Once the assignments of the themes will be distributed, tutors must offer the 1st of the face-to-face tutoring, related to the first phase of the work.
Later, the tutorials will be scheduled by mutual agreement -which should not exceed 6 hours of dedication- and monitoring tutorials - which should not exceed 6h) - In the Evaluation section you can find an orientation of the planning of the tutorials.
During this process, students must compulsorily submit on the established dates the 3 assessment evidences that are detailed in the Evaluation section.
Structure of FYP
The student can choose between two different types of FYP: the professionalizing option and the research option (which can be basic level research on a topic or to deepen a theoretical concept). Regardless of the option chosen, student agree with the tutor, present it in a memory format or in a scientific article format. In both cases it must be delivered in CATALAN language.
A)PROFESSIOLANIZING OPTION. This option involves developing a proposal forFormulation of an intervention project in a given context.an educational or socio-educational action in a given context, starting from a diagnostic study of saidcontext. This option includes the design and/or implementation of a project in a professional settingand/or the implementation and evaluation of an existing project (that is, the student would need toimplement an existing project, evaluate the results and draw specific conclusions). FYPs contextualisedin educational settings where students conducted their work placements may include the contextualanalysis previously performed for the work placement, but under no circumstances will students be ableto reproduce or replicate interventions that were part of their work placements
B) RESEARCH OPTION. This option involves producing an in-depth analysis on a givenResearch proposal on a given topictopic, and must include a theoretical framework, research hypotheses or objectives, and an empiricalpart with results, discussion and conclusions. It must also include a section on methodology and basicresearch techniques (search for, selection and use of tools required to collect, analyse and interpretinformation).. This option involves conducting a theoretical studyIn-Depth analysis of a specific theoretical concept(an essay or monograph), which includes a theoretical, critical or comparative analysis as the basis foran in-depth exploration or argumentation of a given topic. This option must also include an extensive an in-depth exploration or argumentation of a given topic. This option must also include an extensiveliterary review on the topic under study, as well as a clear discussion of the theoretical framework andavailable knowledge on the issue.
REPORT FORMAT
Formal directions according to the report format:
SCIENTIFIC ARTICLE FORMAT
Formal directions according to the article format, similar to an education scientific journal:
In case the tutor sees it as feasible, he or she can suggest the publication of the article in a journal. The tutor should, therefore, help the student in adapting the article to the criteria of rigor and presentation of the chosen journal.
The intellectual property of the FYP will be for the student. However, understanding that the tutor has also contributed to its preparation, in the event of its disclosure will require the consent of both the author and the tutor, being necessary to state the name of the tutor as co-author in the second term.
Title | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|
Type: Supervised | |||
Tutorials | 10 | 0.4 | 1, 2, 11, 10, 6, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 3 |
Type: Autonomous | |||
Autonomous Work | 290 | 11.6 | 1, 2, 11, 10, 6, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 3 |
The FYP Pedagogy degree evaluation arises from two differentiated activities:
The report is evaluated by the tutor at three different times:
These three deliveries are mandatory and not recoverable. If a student does not provide any evidence, the qualification of this will be 0. These documents must be delivered through the enabled spaces by the coordination of Pedagogy degree in the virtual classroom within the established deadlines. The tutor's feed-back must also be sent through this space no later than 15 days after the closing date of the delivery.
Both the characteristics of the three documents and the rubrics of their evaluation will be published in the virtual classroom.
On the other hand, the TFG is evaluated by a group of three teachers of the Pedagogy Degree with the following procedure:
The final grade of the TFG is the result of the evaluation of the tutor and the professors of the presentation in the percentages assigned to each activity.
In the event that a plagiarism percentage of more than 20% is detected, the FYP qualification will be 0. Although students can work on the same subject, the final report document must be completely individual. In accordance with the regulations of the UAB, the execution of other measures can be applied.
To be able to present the work in September it is necessary that the students request the change in the established period. Otherwise, the qualification that will appear in June will be a NOT Evaluable and there will be no possibility to present the work in September.
The evaluation of February is possible when the required conditions are met.
The following table shows the calendar of deliveries, tutorials and activities related to the FYP of the Degree in Pedagogy as regards the preparation of the FYP report.
Moments |
Responsible |
Timmimg |
Hous |
% Assessment |
Delivery date |
Feed-back date |
FYP Presentation
|
Coordinator |
We 2. (1st Sem)
|
1,5 |
|
||
Topics and goals |
Tutor
|
We. 6-8 (1st Sem) |
1,5 |
|||
Start of the project. |
We. 13-14 (1st Sem) |
1,5 |
15% |
November 13 December 18 |
November 20 January 15 |
|
Development |
We 3-4 (2nd Sem) |
1,5 |
30% |
December 9 March 5 |
December 16 March 19 |
|
Method and results |
We 11-12 (2nd Sem) |
1,5 |
|
|||
Final report FYP |
|
55% |
January 22 June 4 September 1 |
February 1 June 15 September 3 |
Once the students submit to each of the calls (February, June, September), the coordination will make public in the communication spaces (website of the Faculty and virtual classroom) the relationship of presentations with the assignment of the students to each of them.
Title | Weighting | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
Project Presentation | 40% | 0 | 0 | 8 |
Project Raport | 60% | 0 | 0 | 1, 2, 11, 10, 6, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 9, 3 |
Supervisors will offer students individual guidance on the most suitable bibliography for their chosen topics.
General references:
Blanch, S., Pérez, E., i Silvente, J. (2018). Com citar i referenciar en els textos acadèmics. Compilació basada en la normativa APA. Recuperat de https://ddd.uab.cat/pub/recdoc/2016/145881/citrefapa_a2016.pdf
Caro, M.T. (2015). Guía de trabajos fin de grado en educación. Madrid: Pirámide.
Ferrer, V., Carmona, M., i Soria, V. (Eds.) (2012). El trabajo de fin de grado. Guía para estudiantes, docentes y agentes colaboradores. Madrid: McGraw-Hill.
Quivy, R., i Van Carnpenhoudt, L. (2005). Manual de investigación en ciencias sociales. Mexico DF: Limusa.
Sánchez, A., Olmos Rueda, P., Torrado Fonseca, M., i García López, J. (2006). Trabajos de fin de Grado y Postgrado. Madrid: ALJIBE
Sancho, J. (2014). Com escriure i presentar el millor treball acadèmic: guia pràctica per a estudiants i professors. Vic: Eumo.
Villar, J.J. (2010). Cómo hacer un trabajo final de carrera para los estudios de grado: notas para estructurar de manera práctica el trabajo final de carrera y plan de marketing para los estudios de grado. Barcelona: Astro Uno.
More information in DDD wher the bets FYP are published.