Degree | Type | Year | Semester |
---|---|---|---|
2500262 Sociology | OB | 2 | 1 |
We strongly recommend to have passed the first grade course on "Fonaments de la Sociologia", and to have a basic knowledge of classical sociological theory.
This course offers a a conceptual and theoretical map of the contemporary sociological theory to students. The aim is to offer them tools to be able to analyse contemporary societiy in a critical and rigurous way, and understand the main theoretical debates that have taken place within the discipline during the XXth century.
In this course, the most significant contributions to contemporary sociological thinking are studied in relation to their social and historical context. More especifically, the course focuses on the following theoretical trends of the XXth century: functionalism, structuralism, symbolic interactionism, phenomenology, ethnomethodology, neomarxism, postmodernism or analytical sociology among others. In order to convey the complexity of Contemporary Sociological Thought, the course combines the presentation of the theories, with the portrait of the historical-intellectual climate of the time.
The course program is structured through the following 5 blocks:
0. Introduction to Contemporary Sociological Thinking.
0.1. Theorize in the twentieth century: historical, political and ethical implications.
0.2. Classics and contemporaries: similarities and differences.
0.3. Intellectual protraits: biographies, gender and ethnicity.
1. Functionalism
1.1. Parsons: from the theory of action to system theory.
1.2. Merton: the paradigm of functional analysis.
1.3. The crisis of functionalism and its causes.
2. The hermeneutic and comprehensive theories
2.1.The Chicago School: Jane Addams, Thomas, Mead and Goffman.
2.2.Sociophenomenology: Schütz, Berger and Luckmann.
2.3. Ethnomethodology: Garfinkel.
3. Neomarxism, critical theory and modernity.
3.1. Marxism after Marx: introduction.
3.2. The Frankfurt School and the "critical theory".
3.3. Hannah Arendt and the human condition
3.3. The theory of the communicative action of Habermas.
3.4. The debate modernity-postmodernity.
4. The outsiders and the reflection on power: Elias, Mills, Foucault, Bourdieu and Judith Butler.
In parallel to the regular program, the course develops a set of three lab sessions that revolve around the idea of power, obedience and social change. They are the following:
a) Power, domination and social order: why do we obey? The practice consists in a reflection on the processes of obedience and the factors that lead to it. The reflection will be encouraged through movie fragments such as "The Experiment" or "The Wave", and will include the realization of a reflective essay.
b) Utopia, collective representations and social order: the dangers of dreaming the future. The practice will consist of watching Margarethe Von Trotta's "Hannah Arendt" film related to the book "Eichmann in Jerusalem: report on the banality of evil" and write an essay. The will is to reflect on the processes of collective obedience and the construction of totalitarian regimes.
c) Power, domination and social order: the critical look at the present. The practice will consist of watching the movie "La Granja de el Pas", and conducting an essay on the construction processes-but also of resistance-of the social order. The will is to propitiate the reflection on the concept of hegemony, counter-hegemony and the possibilities of social transformation.
The course is structured around four types of activities:
1. Exhibition of the contents of the program in class by the teacher - with participation and critical discussion of the students.
2. Practices consisting of text reading seminars, viewing and discussion of films and exercises for the practical application of the theory, among other activities.
3. Tutorials outside the classroom.
4. Autonomous activities by students: reading texts, writing essays and exercises, etc.
Title | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|
Type: Directed | |||
Lectures | 43 | 1.72 | 1, 2, 5, 4, 6, 9, 10, 13 |
Type: Supervised | |||
Essays and Lab | 2 | 0.08 | 3, 5, 10 |
Type: Autonomous | |||
Independent learning | 50 | 2 | 11, 1, 2, 3, 5, 4, 6, 12, 9, 10, 13 |
The assessment consists of the following evidences:
The final exam. Represents 50% of the final mark and it is necessary, as a minimum, to get a 4.75.
Essays: the subject is based on two practical works (to choose between three different options) and each of which represents 20% of the final grade.
Attendance, reading texts and participation in class is mandatory and will be valued at 10% of the mark.
It will be considered that the person has a "Non-Presented" if he has not done the exam.
Title | Weighting | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
Essays | 40 | 30 | 1.2 | 11, 3, 5, 4, 7, 12, 8, 10, 13 |
Exam | 50 | 5 | 0.2 | 1, 2, 6, 9, 13 |
Participation and attendance | 10 | 20 | 0.8 | 11, 1, 2, 5, 4, 7, 9, 10 |
The list of compulsory readings will be published in the moodle site of the course.
1. General textbooks
Alexander, Jeffrey C. (1990). Las teorías sociológicas desde la segunda guerra mundial. Barcelona, Gedisa.
Baert, Patrick (2001). La teoría social en el siglo XX. Madrid, Alianza.
Bottomore, Tom y Nisbet, Robert (eds.). (1988). Historia del análisis sociológico. Buenos Aires, Amorrortu.
De Francisco, Andrés (1997). Sociología y cambio social. Barcelona, Ariel.
Deegan, M. (2012). Sociólogas pioneras y la Sociedad Sociológica Americana: patrones de exclusión y participación. Revista CS, (10), 313-338. https://doi.org/10.18046/recs.i10.1362
Giddens, Anthony y Turner, Jonathan (eds.). (1990). La teoría social, hoy. Madrid, Alianza.
Giner, Salvador (coord.) (2003). Teoría sociológica moderna. Barcelona, Ariel.
JiménezBlanco, José y Moya, Carlos (eds.). (1978). Teoría sociológica contemporánea. Madrid, Tecnos.
Lamo de Espinosa, E. y Rodríguez Ibáñez, J. E. (1993). Problemas de teoría social contemporánea. Madrid, CIS.
Lizón, Angeles (2007). La otra sociología. Una saga de empíricos y analíticos. Barcelona, Montesinos.
Noguera, José A. (ed.) (2006). Analytical Sociological Theory, monográfico de Papers. Revista de Sociologia, nº 80. [Trad. al castellano en preparación por CIS, 2010].
Ritzer, George (2000). Teoría sociológica moderna. Madrid, McGraw Hill, 2002.
Wallace, R., and A. Wolf. (2006). Contemporary Sociological Theory: Expanding the Classical Tradition. 6th ed. Upper Sadlle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice Hall.
Ward, K., & Grant, L. (1991). On a wavelength of their own? Women and sociological theory. Current Perspectives in Social Theory, 11, 117–140.
2. Bibliographical References
Addams, Jane (1909). Democracy and Social Ethics. Nueva York, Macmillan.
Addams, Jane (1909). The spirit of youth and the city streets.Nueva York, Macmillan.
Addams, Jane (1910/1961). Twenty Years at Hull-House, Nueva York, Signet Classics
Anderson, Perry (1976). Consideraciones sobre el marxismo occidental. Madrid, Siglo XXI, 1979.
Anderson, Perry (1983). Tras las huellas del materialismo histórico. Madrid, Siglo XXI, 1989.
Arendt, Hannah. 1958. The Human Condition. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Beck, Ulrich. 1999. World Risk Society. London: Polity Press
Berger, Peter L. y Luckmann, Thomas. (1966). La construcció social de la realitat. Barcelona, Herder, 1988.
Bernstein, Richard J. (1985). "Introducción" a R. Bernstein, (ed.): Habermas y la Modernidad. Madrid: Cátedra.
Bourdieu, P. (2003). Cuestiones de sociología (No. 166). Madrid, Ediciones AKAL.
Bourdieu, P. (1991) El sentido práctico. Madrid, Taurus.
Bourdieu, P. (1999) Meditaciones pascalianas. Barcelona, Anagrama.
Bourdieu, P. (2000) Poder, derecho y clases sociales, Desclée, Bilbao.
Boladeras, Margarita (1996). Comunicación, ética y política: Habermas y sus críticos. Madrid, Tecnos.
Blumer, Herbert. (1969). El Interaccionismo Simbólico: Perspectiva y Método.Barcelona, Hora, 1982.
Butler, Judith. (2001) El género en disputa: el feminismo y la subversión de la identidad. Barcelona, Paidós.
Coulon, Alain (1988). La etnometodología. Madrid, Cátedra, 1988.
Davis, Kingsley y Moore, Wilbert E. (1945): “El contínuo debate sobre la igualdad. Algunosprincipios de estratificación” y “Réplica a Tumin”, en R. Bendix y S.M. Lipset (eds.), Clase, status y poder. Buenos Aires, Eudema, 1972.
Elias, N. (2015). El proceso de la civilización: investigaciones sociogenéticas y psicogenéticas. Mexico, Fondo de cultura económica.
Elias, N. (2003). Ensayo acerca de las relaciones entre establecidos y forasteros. Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas (REIS), (104), 219-251.
Foucault, M. (1993). Microfísica del poder. Madrid, Ediciones la Piqueta.
Foucault, M (i Bermúdez) (2003). Foucault vist per Foucault. Valencia, Bromera.
Foucault, Michel. (1990). History of Sexuality: an Introduction, Volume I. New York: Vintage Books.
Haraway, Donna J. (1997). Modest-Witness@Second-Millenium. FemaleMan_Meets_OncoMouse: Feminism and Technoscience. New York: Routledge.
Hochschild, Arlie. (2012). The managed heart: Commercialization of human feeling. California, Univ of California Press.
Heller, Agnes (1996) “Has Biopolitics Changed the Concept of the Political? Some Further Thoughts About Biopolitics.” In Agnes Heller and Sonja Puntscher Riekmann (eds.). Biopolitics: The Politics of the Body, Race and Nature. Aldershot: Avebury, pp.3-15.
Garfinkel, Harold. (1967). Studies in Ethnometodology. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
Goffman, Erving. (1959). La presentación de la persona en la vida cotidiana. Buenos Aires,
Amorrortu, 1971.
Goffman, Erving. (1961). Internados. Buenos Aires, Amorrortu.
Goffman, Erving. (1963). Estigma. La identidad deteriorada. Buenos Aires, Amorrortu, 1986.
Griera, M. i Clot, A. (2013). Peter Berger. La sociologia com a forma de consciència. Barcelona, Col·lecció Vull saber. Editorial UOC.
Haber, Stephane (1999). Habermas y la sociología. Buenos Aires, Nueva Visión.
Habermas, Jürgen (1981). Teoría de la acción comunicativa(2 vols.). Madrid,Taurus, 1987.
Heritage, John C. (1987):“Etnometodología”, en Anthony Giddens y Johathan Turner (eds.), La
teoría social hoy. Madrid, Alianza, 1998.
Illouz, E. (1997). Consuming the romantic utopia: Love and the cultural contradictions of capitalism. California, Univ of California Press.
Illouz, E. (2007). Intimidades congeladas: las emociones en el capitalismo. Buenos Aires, Katz editores.
Joas, Hans. (1998). El pragmatismo y la teoría de la sociedad. Madrid, CIS.
Lamont, Michèle. (1992). Money, morals, and manners: The culture of the French and the American upper-middle class. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
Lamont, Michèle., & Molnár, V. (2002). The study of boundaries in the social sciences. Annual review of sociology, 28(1), 167-195.
Lévi-Strauss, Claude. (1949). Las estructuras elementales del parentesco. Barcelona, Paidós, 1991.
Lévi-Strauss, Claude. (1967). Antropología estructural. Barcelona, Paidós, 1987.
Luckmann, T (1996) Teoría de la acción social.Barcelona, Paidós.
Mardones, José María (1985). Razón comunicativa y teoría crítica. Bilbao, Universidad del País Vasco.
McCarthy, Thomas (1984). La teoría crítica de Jürgen Habermas. Madrid, Tecnos, 1992.
Mead, George Herbert. (1934). Espíritu, persona y sociedad. Barcelona, Paidós, 1972.
Merton, Robert K. (1949). Teoría y estructura sociales. México, Fondo de Cultura Económica, 1968.
Mills, C.W. (2001). La imaginació sociològica. Barcelona, Herder.
Mills, C. W. (1963). La elite del poder. Mexico, FCE.
Noguera, José Antonio (1996). “La teoría crítica: de Frankfurt a Habermas”, Papers nº 50.
Noguera, José Antonio (2003). “El neoestructuralismo sociológico”, en Salvador Giner (ed.), Teoría sociológica moderna. Barcelona, Ariel.
Nizet, J & Rigaux, N (2006) La Sociología de Erving Goffman. Barcelona, Melusina
Parsons, Talcott. (1937). La estructura de la acción social.Madrid, Guadarrama, 1968.
Parsons, Talcott. (1951). El sistema social.Madrid, Alianza, 1988.
Parsons, Talcott. (1966). La sociedad: perspectivas evolutivas y comparativas. México, Trillas, 1974.
Parsons, Talcott. (1966). Estructura y proceso en las sociedades modernas.Madrid: Instituto de Estudios Modernos.
Schütz, Alfred. (1932). Fenomenología del mundo social. Buenos Aires, Paidós, 1972.
Schütz, Alfred. (1964). Estudios sobre teoría social. Buenos Aires, Amorrortu, 1974.
Schütz, Alfred. (1973). El problema de la realidad social.Buenos Aires, Amorrortu, 1974.
Toharia, José Juan (1978): “El funcionalismo normativista: la obra de Talcott Parsons”, en J. Jiménez Blanco y C. Moya (eds.), Teoría sociológica contemporánea. Madrid, Tecnos.
Torns, Teresa. (1989). Els orígens de la sociologia a Catalunya i la figura de Santiago Valentí i Camp. Papers: revista de sociologia, (31), 175-184.
Zeitlin, I. (1981). "La sociología de Erving Goffman". Papers. Revista de Sociologia, nº 15.