Degree | Type | Year | Semester |
---|---|---|---|
2500241 Archaeology | OB | 2 | 2 |
It is recommended that the students have previous knowledge of detail in History in general, from the "Prehistory" and "Ancient History" to the "Contemporary". Likewise, a slight knowledge of current, modern and postmodern critical thoughts is desirable.
The subject aims to be a scenario for debate on how economic, social and ideological factors that generate and manage archaeological knowledge operate.
BLOCK 1
1. Knowledge, Science, Methods and Explanations
2. Types: Description, Classification, Taxonomy
3. Labour and Production
4. Economic Forms
5. Value
BLOCK 2
6. Complexity, Hierarchy and Stratification
- Prestige, status, role
- Property, social classes
7. Culture, System and Society
8. Ideology
9. Gender
10. War and Violence
The subject is composed of theoretical classes and seminars. Theoretical classes will introduce the contents central to each one of the topics, linking the different theoretical trends with their historical context and the problems that are trying to solve.
Seminars will be carried out in a team of theoretical application analysis in the practice of archeology.
Title | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|
Type: Directed | |||
Theoretical classes | 47 | 1.88 | 2, 5 |
Type: Supervised | |||
Classroom practices - discussion seminars | 25 | 1 | 2, 5, 4, 1, 3, 7 |
Type: Autonomous | |||
Individual or group study | 75 | 3 | 2, 4, 7 |
- 60%: Works in group (maximum 3 people and 4 pages). One for each block. Possibility of recovery.
- 30%: Presentations to class of work (maximum 3 people)
- 10%: Participation in classes
At the moment of completion/delivery of each assessment activity, will inform (Virtual Campus) of the procedure and date of revision of qualifications.
Will be classified as Non-evaluable when has not delivered more than 30% of the evaluation activities.
In the event of committing any irregularity that may lead to a significant variation in the grade awarded to an assessment activity, the person will be given a zero for this activity, regardless of any disciplinary process that may take place. In the event of several irregularities in assessment activities of the same subject, the student will be given a zero as the final grade for this subject.
In the event that tests or exams cannot be taken onsite, they will be adapted to an online format made available through the UAB’s virtual tools (original weighting will be maintained). Homework, activities and class participation will be carried out through forums, wikis and/or discussion on Teams, etc. Lecturers will ensure that students are able to access these virtual tools, or will offer them feasible alternatives.
Title | Weighting | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
Delivery of written works | 60 | 0 | 0 | 2, 5, 4, 1, 6, 3, 7 |
Presentations in class | 30 | 0 | 0 | 2, 5, 1, 3, 7 |
participation in class | 10 | 3 | 0.12 | 2, 3, 7 |
AAVV (2000). "Queer Archaeologies". World Archaeology, vol.32 (2),
Anderson, P. (2000), Los orígenes de la postmodernidad. Anagrama, Barcelona.
Bate, L.F. (1998). El proceso de investigación en arqueología, Crítica, Barcelona.
Binford, L. (1977), For Theory Building in Archeology, Academic Press, New York.
Castro-Martinez, P.V. et al (1996). “Teoría de las Prácticas Sociales”, Complutum Extra, 6 (II): 35-48.
Castro-Martinez, P. V., Gili, S., Lull, V., Mico, R., Rihuete, C., Risch, R. i Sanahuja, E. (1998). “Teoría de la producción de la vida social. Un análisis de los mecanismos de explotación en el sudeste peninsular (3000-l550 cal ANE)”. Boletín de Antropología Americana, 33: 25-78.
Castro-Martinez, P. V., Escoriza-Mateu, T. (2005). "Trabajo y Sociedad en Arqueología. Producciones y relaciones versus orígenes y desigualdades". Revista Atlántica-Mediterránea de Prehistoria y Arqueología Social, VII: 131-147.
Castro-Martinez, P. V., Escoriza-Mateu, T. (2009). “Lugares Reales y Lugares Ideales. Mujeres y Hombres: Realidad e Ideología en Arqueología”, Cuadernos de Prehistoria de la Universidad de Granada, 19: 37-64.
Castro-Martinez, P. V., Escoriza-Mateu, T. (2014) “Por una Arqueología Social, contra las Manipulaciones Convenientes”, Arkeogazte. Revista de Arqueología, 4: 25-42.
Clarke,D.L. (1984) Arqueología analítica. Ed. Bellaterra. Barcelona.
Conkey, M. i Spector, J. (1984). “Archaeology and the study of gender”. Hays-Gilpin, K. i Whitley, D.S. (ed.). Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory , 7:1-38.
Escoriza-Mateu, T., Castro-Martinez, P.V. (2009). “Cuidándonos. Mantenimiento de Mujeres y Hombres en las Sociedades Agrafas”, en M. E. Jaime de Pablos, ed (2009), Identidades Femeninas en un Mundo Plural, Arcibel, Sevilla, “Colección AUDEM”: 203-216.
Foucault, M. (1979). Microfísica del poder. Las ediciones de La Piqueta, Madrid.
Foucault, M. (1988). La arqueología del saber. Siglo XXI, México.
Hodder, I. (1987). “La arqueología en la era post-moderna”, Trabajos de prehistoria, 44: 11-26.
Hodder, I. (1988). Interpretación en arqueología. Corrientes actuales. Crítica, Barcelona.
Jameson, F. (1991). El posmodernismo o la lógica cultural del capitalismo avanzado. Paidós, Barcelona.
Kuhn, T.S. (1971) La estructura de las revoluciones científicas, F.C.E., México.
Lyotard, F. (1996). La posmodernidad explicada a los ninos. Gedisa. Barcelona.
Lakatos, I. (1983). La metodología de los programas de investigación científica. Alianza Editorial. Madrid.
Lull, V. (2005). “Marx, producción, sociedad y arqueología”. Trabajos de Prehistoria, 62 (1): 7-26
Lumbreras, L. (1974). La Arqueología como Ciencia Social. Ediciones Histar, Lima.
Marx, K. 1844 (1968). Manuscritos: economía y filosofía. (Traducción de Francisco Rubio Llorente). Alianza Ed. (Madrid 1968).
Marx, K. 1857 (1989). Introducción a la crítica de la Economía Política.(Traducción de Marat Kuznetsov). En Marx, Engels, Lenin: Obras. Ed. Progreso (Moscú 1989: 178-208)
Marx, K. i Engels, F. 1845-46 (1970). La Ideología Alemana. (Traducción de W. Roces). Ed. Grijalbo. Barcelona.
McGuire, R. H. (1992). A Marxist Archaeology, Academic Press.
Narotzky, S. (1995). Mujer, Mujeres, Género. Una Aproximación Crítica al Estudio de las Mujeres en las Ciencias Sociales, CSIC. Madrid.
Shanks, M. i Tilley, C. (1987). Re-constructing Archaeology. Theory and Practice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Shanks, M. i Tilley, C. (1987). Social Theory and Archaeology. Polity Press, Cambridge.
Trigger, B. G. (1992). Historia del pensamiento arqueológico. Crítica, Barcelona.