Degree | Type | Year | Semester |
---|---|---|---|
2502758 Humanities | OB | 3 | 1 |
There is not
PRESENTATION
This material is based on the conviction that cultural management is an ideal and privileged instrument for transformation and social cohesion in our society. Its contents revolve around this principle and the professor of this subject develops his professional activity outside the UAB, in contexts of diversity and from the management of projects of sociocultural and educational nature. The sessions are developed at all times combining basic aspects of a theoretical nature with real and applied base experiences and projects. In this way, the learning processes are carried out in parallel and combining inductive and deductive processes. However, during the sessions, it is planned to invite cultural management professionals to deepen or expand the contents of the subject.
BLOCK 1: Contextualization of cultural management in a context of complexity
BLOCK 2: Planning as a key and transversal element in cultural management
BLOCK 3: Some variables for the diagnosis of organizations in the frameworkof cultural management
BLOCK 4: The design, implementation and evaluation of socio-cultural actions in the framework of cultural management
BLOCK 5: Scenarios of Cultural Management in Catalonia
The methodology combines the following elements and spaces:
Spaces of master class
Guided practical activities
Supervised work spaces for the realization of group work
Interventions by cultural management professionals
Title | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|
Type: Supervised | |||
Supervised activities (support teamwork, tutorials) | 50 | 2 | 4, 5, 7, 8, 2 |
Type: Autonomous | |||
Autonomous activities (study, reading and pre-publication of work) | 25 | 1 | 4, 5, 8, 9 |
The evaluation system will be based on an individual work related to Block 1, a group work related to Block 2, 3 and 4 and a work of reflection and self-evaluation related to the assumption of the contents given throughout of the subject.
As an indispensable requirement to pass the subject, it is necessary to have completed and passed both parts, with a minimum numerical mark of 5.
Individual work
Corresponds to block 1 of the syllabus.
During the month of October, a document will be delivered with the indications for carrying out this individual work, together with the guidelines on the complementary bibliography for its elaboration.
It will consist of an essay and will account for 30% of the final grade.
Work in group
Corresponds to blocks 2, 3 and 4 of the syllabus.
During the month of October, a document will be delivered with the indications for carrying out this group work, together with the guidelines on complementary experiences for its elaboration.
It is a design and presentation in class, of a cultural project and represents 60% of the final grade, divided into two percentages of 40 and 20% corresponding to each of the two aspects. "
Tutoring and class participation
During the elaboration of the group work it will be necessary to carry out a minimum of two tutorials in group (exposition of the thematic and the initial idea and defense of the elaborated project).
Also, active and critical participation in class will be considered positive.
It represents 10% of the final grade.
As recovery mechanisms, and in the face of the following assumptions, two possibilities are foreseen:
1) Not having passed the individual work: carry out a new one, based on the teacher's guidelines and opting for a maximum grade of 5.
2) Failure to pass the group work: take a written test on the date set by the Faculty.
Thus, only ONE of the two main items - Individual work or Group work (Design) - of the continuous evaluation process can be recovered.
Plagiarism
In the event of a student committing any irregularity that may lead to a significant variation in the grade awarded to an assessment activity, the student will be given a zero for thisactivity, regardless of any disciplinary process that may take place. In the event of several irregularities in assessment activities of the same subject, the student will be given a zero as the final grade for this subject.
Multiple and complex scenario forecasting
In the event that the tests cannot be done in person, their format will be adapted (maintaining their weighting) to the possibilities offered by the UAB’s virtual tools. Homework, activities and class participation will be done through forums, wikis and / or discussion discussions through Teams, skype etc. The teacher will ensure that the Student can access it or offer alternative means, which are within his / her reach.
Title | Weighting | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
Individual reflection and self-evaluation | 10% | 3 | 0.12 | 4 |
GROUP WORK (design and tutorials) | 40 % | 40 | 1.6 | 5, 9 |
GROUP WORK (preparation and defense) | 20% | 10 | 0.4 | 6, 7, 8 |
INDIVIDUAL WORK | 30% | 22 | 0.88 | 1, 3, 9, 2 |
AJUNTAMENT DE BARCELONA (1999). Manual de gestió de les organitzacions no lucratives. Barcelona: Staff Empresarial.
APPADURAI, A. (2007). El rechazo de las minorías: ensayo sobre la geografía de la furia. Barcelona: Tusquets.
ARIÑO, A. (2008). Estilos de aculturación y conciencia intercultural. A: García, j. i Lacomba, j. (eds.) La inmigración en la sociedad española. Una radiografia multidisciplinar, p. 245-266. Barcelona: Edicions Bellaterra.
ARAMENDI, J. (2004). Organizaciones socioeducativas y competencias profesionales. Universidad del País Vasco.
ALBERICH, T. (1998): Guía fácil de asociaciones. Manual de gestión parabla creación, desarrollo y dinamización de entidades sin ánimo de lucro. Madrid: Dykinson.
BAUMAN, Z. (2005). Vidas desperdiciadas: la modernidad y sus parias. Barcelona: Paidós.
BECK, U. (2007). Cómo los vecinos se convierten en judíos : la construcción política del extraño en una era de modernidad reflexiva. [en línia]. Papers : revista de sociologia. núm. 84. 2007. p. 47-66 http://ddd.uab.cat/pub/papers/02102862n84p47.pdf
BENHABIB, Seyla (2006). Las Reivindicaciones de la cultura: igualdad y diversidad en la era global. Buenos Aires : Katz.
BOIX, T. (1990). Animación y gestión cultural. València: Grup dissabte.
CONNORS, T.D. (Ed.) (1998). Manual de les organitzacions no lucratives (Volum I). Barcelona: Edicions Pleniluni
DASSETTO, F. (2004). “Más allá de lo intercultural: los retos de la co-inclusión” [en línia]. Revista CIDOB d'afers internacionals. núm. 66-67.p. 99-111 <http://www.cidob.org/es/content/download/3156/33090/file/dassetto_cast.pdf> [Consulta: octubre 2008]
DELGADO, M. (2008). La identidad en acción. La cultura como factor discursivo de exclusión y de lucha [en línia]. Eikasia: revista de filosofía. núm. 17. p. 261-274 < http://www.revistadefilosofia.com/17-08.pdf >
DiMAGGIO, P. (1987). Managers of the Arts: Careers and Opinions of Senior Administrators of U.S. Art Museums, Symphony Orchestras. Redident Theatres, and Local Arts Agencies.Washington: Seven Locks Press.
DRUCKER, P. (2000). Organitzacions sense ànim de lucre. Gestió: teoria i pràctica. Barcelona: Edicions UOC-ECSA.
FANTOVA, F. (2001). La gestión de organizaciones no lucrativas. Madrid: Editorial CCS.
FERRANDEZ, A. (1987). “Cultura, Educación y Municipios”, a Gairín, J,; Antúnez, S. y Pérez Guede, A.: Temas actuales en educación. Barcelona: PPU.
FERRANDEZ, A. y Puente, J.M. (1990). Materiales AFFA. Madrid: Fondo de Promoción de Empleo.
FRANCH, J. Y MARTINELL, A. (1986). La animación de grupos de tiempo libre y vacaciones. Barcelona: Laia.
FROUFE, S. (1994). Construir la animación sociocultural. Salamanca: Amarú.
GAIRÍN, Joaquín (1994)."Dinámica organizativa". En GAIRÍN, Joaquín; DARDER, Pere. (coord.): Organización y gestión de centros educativos. Barcelona: Praxis.
IBAR, M. (1992). Cómo organizar y gestionar una entidad de animación sociocultural. Madrid: Narcea.
LAAKSONEN, A. (2006). La cultura comprometida: los derechos y deberes culturales. Periférica: Revista para el análisis de la cultura y el territorio. núm. 7. 2006. p. 105- 119
MARTINELL, A. (1999). Los agentes culturales ante los nuevos retos de la gestión cultural. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación. 20, 201-215.
MARTUCCELLI, D. (2004). “Lo intercultural ante la prueba de la dinámica entre exclusión e integración social” [en línia]. Revista CIDOB d'afers internacionals. núm. 66-67. p. 53-68 http://www.cidob.org/es/content/download/3148/33066/file/martucelli_cast.pdf
MUNILLA, G. (Coord) (2000). Introducció a la gestió d’organitzacions culturals. Barcelona: UOC.
NUTT, P. i BACKOFF, R.W. (1992). Strategic management of public ans third sector organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
PAREKH, B. (2005). Repensando el multiculturalismo: diversidad cultural y teoría política. Tres Cantos: Istmo.
POSE PORTO, H. (2007). La cultura en las cuidades. Barcelona: Graó.
ROSELLÓ, D. (2004). Diseño y evaluación de proyectos culturales. Barcelona: Ariel.
TONO, J. (2007). Conceptos y experiencias de la Gestión Cultural. Secretaría General Técnica. Ministerio de Cultura.
ÚCAR, X. (1992). El teatro en la animación sociocultural. Madrid: Diagrama.
UNESCO (2009). Informe Mundial de la UNESCO. Invertir en la diversidad cultural y en el diálogo intercultural. Informe Executiu, París.
UNESCO (2007). Convenció sobre la protecció i la promoció de la diversitat de les expressions culturals. UNESCOCAT – Comissió Nacional Andorrana per a la UNESCO. Barcelona: Angle Editorial.
VECIANA, J.Mª (1995). Función directiva. Bellaterra: Servei de Publicacions de la UAB.
VERNIS, A. et al. (1997). La gestió de les organitzacions no lucratives. Treballant per las millora de les associacions. Barcelona: Proa-Columna.