Degree | Type | Year | Semester |
---|---|---|---|
2500259 Political Science and Public Management. | OB | 3 | 1 |
2503778 International Relations | OB | 2 | 1 |
We expect students to have basic previous knowledge of International Relations, developed for instance by way of a general course on IR. We also expect them to be able to keep themselves informed about internaternational current affairs, as well as some capacity for analysis, argumentation, and debate.
This is an advanced education course, and it complements the knowledge acquired in previous, more general courses (particularly on International Relations).
It will allow students to develop their own view about the post-Cold War international system, and in turn it will contribute to their further training in IR and help them take more specific IR classes or get ready for graduate programmes.
Students will learn about the key changes that have taken place in the international system since the end of the Cold War, in issue areas such as the form and distribution of power, actors and their (new) roles, challenges, conflicts and relationships. They will also learn about some of the concerns that have defined international relations since the early 1990s.
It is around such matters that we expect students to develop their analytical skills, as well as their capacity to articulte and debate ideas and concepts.
1. Introduction
-A world without the cold war
-Diverse explanations: Ideas/Institutions/Power
-A globalized international order
-Fragmentation and complexity: Levels of analysis and multidimensional agenda
2. Globalized international order: the big picture
The end of geography
A single (unequal) world
Instantaneity
Interaction density
Block I. The evolution of the international system: facts and features
3. A world without the cold war. Ideas: managing the end of the cold war
-Neoidealist moment
-The UN at the central strage, wider agenda and new norms: the “solidarism”
-Peace Missions
-The global agenda: Rio 1992
4. A world without the cold war. Institutions: negotiating the norms of the system
-An institutionalist stage
-Amending the Agenda for Peace (1995), Rwanda (1994), Srebrenica (1995)
-Humanitarian intervention and its limits. Kosovo 1999
-Institutionalization: WTO, Kyoto, ICC, anti-personnel landmines.
5. A world without the cold war. Power: hierarchy and conflicts over values
-Seattle (1999): no-global and the Global South
-The impact of 9/11 (2001): global terror and coalitions of the willing
-The non-proliferation agenda: India, Iran, North Korea
-Global South and emerging powers: redistribution of power in the international institutions (WTO, UNSC, UNHRC)
-Global crisis (2008) and minilateralism (G20).
Block II. Globalized international order: structure, actors and interactions
6. Polarity: The US hegemony
-The concept of polarity: resources and alliances
-Hegemony (material or normative)
-The US unipolar moment
-Hegemony and the provision of public goods: the governance of economic interdependence
7. Polarity: Emerging powers
-Emerging economies: BRICS
-Institutionalization (BRICS, BASIC), soft balancing and ideational power
-Acknowledging the new powers
-Debate: The reform of the Security Council
8. Normative controversy
-Westphalia: pluralist logic and coexistence norms
-(Liberal) solidarism, post-cold war and conflicts over values
-Norm diffusion mechanisms
-New concepts: human security and sustainable development
9. Regionalization
-A multilevel world: decentralized globalization
-The interaction between the global and regional levels
-New regionalism: reaction vis-à-vis globalization
-Regional security complexes
10. New wars
-Evolution towards intra-state, internationalized conflicts
-Explaining conflicts: ethnicity, natural resources
-The privatization of violence and mass violation of Human Rights
-Globalization and the weakness of the state
11. Global governance
-Beyond the society of states (Commission on Global Governance, 1995)
-The intensification of governance between states (trans-governmental networks)
-Transnational civil society
-Private governance (private authorities)
III. Case studies: Global problems and governance
12. Conceptual and analytical framework
-Multilateralism and international agenda-setting
-International institutions
-International regimes (delimitation)
-International organizations (formalization)
-Effectiveness and legitimacy
13. Analysis: International regimes
This section of the course suggests a list of some very diverse issue areas which are currently part of the agenda of international negotiations. Four of them will be touched upon along the course and students will deliver reports about them by applying an analytical framework designed to study international regimes (information and files can be found at Campus Virtual)
-Climate change
-Anti-personnel landmines
-Weapons of mass destruction –Nuclear proliferation
-Diamonds (resources and armed conflicts)
-Human rights
-Rights of the children
-Women, peace and security (UNSC Resolution 1325).
-Refugees and displaced persons
-Genocide –International criminal justice
-Terrorism
-Genetically-modified organisms
-Transnational crime
--
Title | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|
Type: Directed | |||
Learning activities with audiovisual material | 4 | 0.16 | 3, 4, 10, 9, 24, 31, 6 |
Lectures | 34 | 1.36 | 3, 4, 8, 10, 9, 17, 16, 24, 29, 5, 6 |
Seminars | 10 | 0.4 | 3, 4, 8, 10, 9, 18, 20, 17, 15, 16, 24, 30, 29, 31, 28, 5, 6 |
Type: Supervised | |||
Out-of-class supervision of deliverables and office-hours more generally | 5 | 0.2 | 3, 8, 10, 9, 11, 18, 17, 15, 16, 24, 30, 29, 28, 6 |
Type: Autonomous | |||
Autonomous out-of-class work | 49 | 1.96 | 17, 15, 16, 24, 29 |
Autonomous out-of-class work related to seminars | 40 | 1.6 | 3, 4, 8, 11, 18, 20, 17, 15, 16, 24, 30, 29, 31, 28, 5, 6 |
The final qualification depends on the grades obtained in the following assignments.
1. A final exam. The final exam (individual and in written form) aims to test the degree of knowledge of students, both as regards analytical concepts and substantive issues addressed in the course (all the course is included in this, also issues raised in seminar sessions). The exam accounts for 50% of the final grade. You need to pass the exam (5 points out of 10) in order to pass the course.
2. A short exercise to be written at class on humanitarian intervention and R2P. Students will have worked with the key documents and discourses issued by several international actors and will also hand in an out-of-class paper. This session accounts for 20% of the final grade. Block II.
3. A short written exercise, plus a presentation and debate at class in small groups (we will divide the class in subgroups) on an assigned issue regarding international regimes. Students will also hand in an out-of-class paper on this issue. This accounts for 20% of your final grade. Block III.
4. Participation in class activities and debates accounts for 10% of the final grade.
Notes on the course:
In order to successfully pass the course, students will need at least a 5/10 at the final exam. The exam is designed for students to show a basic and balanced knowledge of the theoretical and substantive contents of the three blocks of the syllabus. A minimum of 5/10 at the exam grade is a necessary condition for the rest of the grades to be taken into account. Students who fail the exam will have to re-take it.
There will also be re-take options for the other assignments.
The precise dates of the seminar sessions and the debates on the reports will be announced at Campus Virtual, together with the rest of the course plan. The files for the preparation of these sessions will be found at Campus Virtual too.
Title | Weighting | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
Final exam | 50% | 3 | 0.12 | 1, 2, 4, 26, 8, 7, 10, 9, 13, 17, 16, 21, 24, 29, 19, 27, 5, 12, 6 |
International regime: deliverables, in-class debate and short written in-class exercise. | 20% | 2 | 0.08 | 3, 1, 2, 4, 26, 8, 7, 10, 9, 17, 16, 23, 21, 22, 24, 29, 31, 25, 6 |
Participation | 10% | 0 | 0 | 4, 7, 9, 11, 13, 20, 17, 15, 16, 23, 21, 24, 29, 19, 28, 25, 6 |
R2P: deliverables, in-class debate and short written in-class exercise. | 20% | 3 | 0.12 | 3, 1, 2, 4, 26, 7, 11, 18, 20, 14, 15, 23, 21, 22, 24, 30, 31, 28, 25, 12 |
See the syllabus