a) Submit a written report of the work carried out according to the established model and adapted to the type of work (scientific article, engineering project or innovation and development project).
b) Carry out a public defense of the work before the evaluation commission. The qualification criteria are based on: 1) evaluation rubrics completed by the evaluation committee, which include aspects of the quality of the written report, presentation and discussion, and 2) the assessment presented by the direction of the work of the work, according to the rubric established for this purpose. These rubrics are available in the master's Moodle.
Grades range from 0 to 10. If any form of plagiarism or similar malpractice is detected early, the director of the work and the student will be informed and their defense is prevented. The evaluation commission is made up of three professors, preferably doctors from the Department of Chemical, Biological and Environmental Engineering of the UAB, and the replacement of a member by an external expert may be required when the coordinator deems it necessary .
It is mandatory for the student to have a minimum of 3 tutorials with the academic tutor, in case the TFM is done in a company, or with the director in case the TFM is done at the DEQBA. It is also mandatory for the student to have the approval of the academic tutor, in case of TFM in a company, or the director, in case of TFM at the DEQBA, in order to be able to present the report.
The oral presentation of the work is limited to a maximum of 15 minutes, after which the panel can ask questions about the master's thesis that demonstrate that the student has acquired the skills of their particular field of specialization. It can be presented in Catalan, Spanish or English.
The weighting of the final grade has the following distribution:
- Evaluation of the written report by the committee -20-60%
- Evaluation of the presentation and oral discussion with the members of the committee- 20-60%
- Report of the director or directors of the TFM - 20-60%
The evaluation panel considers, among other aspects:
1) Memory: Appropriate use of language. The document can be written in English, Catalan or Spanish. The choice of language is not a criterion for the evaluation and the court will only evaluate the correct and appropriate use of the chosen language. Format: if you correctly follow the relevant guidelines according to the typology of the TFM. Conciseness and ability to analyze and interpret the results or work products.
2) Oral defense: The student's ability to communicate. Conciseness and compliance with the established time. The quality of the presentation. The ability to answer questions asked by the court.
Honors. Awarding a grade with honors is the decision of the teaching staff responsible for the subject and the teaching staff that evaluates the students. The UAB regulations indicate that the MH may only be awarded to students who have obtained a final grade equal to or greater than 9.00. Up to 5% MH of the total number of students enrolled can be awarded. In the event that there are more students with a final grade greater than 9 than the percentage or fraction stipulated above, the MH will be awarded to the highest grade, once all the students enrolled in the module have defended, regardless of the group they belong to. and the date of the defense.