Assessment

Continous Assessment Activities

Title	Weighting	Hours	ECTS	Learning Outcomes
Evidence 1. Individual submission, during the practical session with the assigned group, of the analysis results of a practical case related to topics 1 to 6 (approximately during weeks 4 to 7); Written feedback will be provided within two weeks after	15	0	0	CM14, KM17, SM18
Evidence 2: Written evidence consisting of a set of multiple choice questions related to units 1-6, as well as to the Jamovi tables that make the previous analysys (1st assessment period); Written feedback provided in two weeks	40	2.5	0.1	CM14, KM17, SM16, SM18
Evidence 3. Individual submission in the practical group session of the analysis results of a practical problem related to topics 7–12 (approx. weeks 13–17); Written feedback provided in two weeks	15	0	0	CM14, KM17, SM18
Evidence 4: Writted evidence consisting of a set of multiple choice questions related to units 7-12, as well as tables witth Jamovi (2nd assessment period); Written feedback provided in two weeks	40	2.5	0.1	CM14, KM17, SM16, SM18

EV1 and EV3 are submitted individually during the practical sessions. The writing must be totally original and not copied from other sources or groups. In order for an evidence to be evaluated, it will be necessary to have attended 2/3 of its practices in person. The weight of each of these evidences is 15%. 

The EV2 and EV4 (individual exams) consist of a set of approximately 25 multiple choice questions (three answer options, penalty for errors; two errors discount one correct, according to the usual criteria k-1). Students will be allowed to bring printed the material prepared by the teaching team as well as notes of the student's own elaboration. Electronic devices will not be available except for a calculator (not a mobile phone). At demand of the teaching staff, the students could have the statement and some Jamovi results tables a few hours before.

Although all assessment activities in this course are carried out in person, the teaching staff reserves the right to require an individual oral defense of any submitted evidence. This measure may be applied when there are reasonable indications that cast doubt on the authenticity, authorship, or integrity of the evidence. This includes, among other cases, possible inconsistencies in content or writing style, results that are incoherent with the student’s other work, suspicion of non-original content, or signs of unauthorized copying or collaboration during the assessment. Such an oral defense may be required even when the evidence constitutes the sole assessment instrument for the student, as a mechanism to ensure the validity, reliability, and fairness of the evaluation process. If the oral defense is not successfully passed, the teaching staff may review the initial grade and, if deemed appropriate, annul the corresponding evidence.

The responses to all the evaluation evidence must be original (writings detected from other sources or copied or plagiarized responses will not be accepted). A breach of this condition implies the nullification of the evidence. More than one non-compliance will suppose a final qualification of 0 in the subject (in application to the regulations on evaluation of the UAB and of the Psychology degree. These measures will be applied to all the people involved in the evaluation irregularity.

In order to pass the subject through continuous assessment, the following criteria must be meet: 1) The weighted sum of all the evidence must be equal to or greater than 5 points. 2) The average of EV2 and EV4 should be 4.5 or higher (onascale of 0 to 10); otherwise the maximum grade in the course will be 4.5.

In accordance with the UAB regulations, students who have not passed the course and who meet: 1) have carried out evidence with a weight ofat least 2/3 of the total and 2) have a continuous assessment mark 3.5 or higher, may be eligible for resit. The EV2 and/or EV4 can be recovered. The qualification of the recovered evidence will replace the previously obtained and the total qualification will be recalculated with the criteria aforementioned.

A student who has submitted evidence of learning with a weight equal to or greater than 4 points (40%) will be recorded as 'evaluable'.

No unique final synthesis test for students who enroll for the second time or more is anticipated.

The presentation of the translation of the of the statements of the in-person assessment tests will be carried out if the requirements established in Article 263 of the academic regulations are met and the request is made in week 4 online (e-form) (more information on the faculty website).

The single assessment(AU) will take place on the same day and at the same location as the exam for the second assessment period of the students. All course content will be assessed.The same evidence will be used, and the final grade for the students will be calculated as described for continuous assessment, with the same weightings as indicated in the Continuous assessment. The total duration will be 3–4 hours. The single assessment must be requested online (e-form) during the specific period (more information on the faculty website).

Use of Artificial Intelligence: In accordance with the model established by the faculty regarding the use of artificial intelligence, it is considered permitted solely as a tool to support study and self-directed learning, but not allowed during the completion of any assessment evidence. All evaluations are conducted in person, and the use of any software other than JAMOVI is not authorized. Therefore, the use of AI-based technologies is restricted to the context of personal study, under the responsibility of the student, and it must be understood that such tools cannot be considered sources whose content has been validated by the teaching staff. If the use of any unauthorized software, including artificial intelligence tools, is detected during the completion of an assessment, that evidence will be graded with a 0.

Link to the assessment guidelines of the Faculty of Psychology and Speech Therapy: https://www.uab.cat/doc/DOC_Pautes_Avaluacio_2025-2026