Assessment

Continous Assessment Activities

Title	Weighting	Hours	ECTS	Learning Outcomes
Course work	40%	6	0.24	KM10, KM11, SM10
Individual practices in the Classroom	10%	5	0.2	KM10, KM11, SM10
Individual test of theoretical and practical contents of Documentary Management.	25%	2	0.08	KM10, KM11, SM10
Individual test of theoretical and practical contents of Marketing	25%	2	0.08	KM10, KM11, SM10

The system for passing the course is through continuous assessment. This means carrying out and handing in the different assessment activities foreseen, which are detailed below:

1. Individual classroom practice (10% of the final mark). The follow-up of the continuous assessment requires the completion of at least 70% of the exercises, both in Marketing and Document Management.

2. Individual tests (50% of the final mark). There will be one exam on theoretical and practical aspects of Marketing (25% of the final mark) and another on Document Management (25% of the final mark). These two tests aim to assess the acquisition and understanding of the main theoretical and practical contents of the subject in its two aspects and must demonstrate the degree of learning and autonomous study of the students.

In order to follow the continuous assessment, the average of the two individual tests cannot be lower than 4. If the average mark is lower than 3, the course will be failed without the possibility of re-evaluation. Students with an average mark between 3 and 3.99 will have to take the retake of the tests in which they have not achieved a 5.

3. Coursework (40% of the final mark). This is a group work to be carried out entirely during the second semester. Its aim is to combine the two components of the subject through a practical case study. The assignments for each group and the specifics on how to carry out and monitor the group work will be given at the beginning of the second semester.

The final qualification will be obtained from the sum of the percentages corresponding to the three evaluated items as long as the requirements to follow the continuous assessment are met. To pass the course, the sum of the three items must reach 5.

In this subject there is no single evaluation.

Recovery.

Students will be entitled to the revaluation of the subject. They should present a minimum of activitiesthat equals two-thirds of the total grading.  

To be eligible for the recovery, students must have completed at least 70% of the PIAs in both the Marketing and Document Management sections and have obtained a mark of no less than 3 as an average in the individual tests in Marketing and Document Management. 

The individual tests of Marketing and Document Management can be recovered. The activities excluded from resit assessment are the individual practicals and the course project, as they are based on continuous development and cannot be reproduced outside the scheduled period.

Consideration as "Not Assessable"

Students who have not completed at least 33% of the assessment activities planned for the course will be considered "not assessable," and this will be reflected in their final grade.

Plagiarism

In the event that the student performs any irregularity that may lead to a significant variation of an evaluation act, this evaluation act will be graded with 0, regardless of the disciplinary process that could be instructed. In the event, that several irregularities occur in the evaluation acts of the same subject, the final grade for this subject will be 0.

Spelling and grammatical correction

Incorrect spelling or grammatical mistakes in any of the activities of the subject will subtract points from their qualifications.

Use of AI

In this course, the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies is permitted as an integral part of the development of the coursework, provided that the final result reflects a significant contribution from the student in terms of analysis and personal reflection. Students must clearly identifywhich parts have been generated using such technologies, specify the tools used, and include a critical reflection on how these tools have influenced both the process and the final outcome of the activity. Lack of transparency in the use of AI will be considered a breach of academic integrity and may result in a penalty on the activity’s grade or more severe sanctions in serious cases.