Assessment

Continous Assessment Activities

Title	Weighting	Hours	ECTS	Learning Outcomes
Group assessment	45%	0	0	2, 1, 3, 5, 4
Group assessment - Problems	10%	0	0	2, 1, 3, 5, 4
Individual assessment	45%	4	0.16	2, 1

This subject doesn't allow evaluation not continous

The subject consists of 3 different subjects that will be assessed independently. To pass the whole subject, the 3 subjects must be passed with a minimum of 5 over 10. The mark of each topic is computed as:

• 45% individual assessment through a written test of that part,
• 45% group assessment based on the result of the practice (previous work and laboratory session). It will be necessary to validate this note through a practice test that will be done the same days as the individual theory tests. If the validation is not exceeded, the note of the practice will be 0.
• 10% one or various problem submission 

Both the theoretical and practical parts of each topic must be approved separately with a minimum of 5 out of 10 each.

In the event of failing any of the written tests, there is a recovery exam for the topic that was failed at the end of the semester.

In the event of failing any of the practices, an individual practice recovery exam must be taken on the day of the recovery exam at the end of the semester. If the validation of the practice in the written test is suspended, this recovery practice must also be taken. It should be taken into account that there may be little time between the final exam of the subject, where the validation of the practices of topics 2 and 3 is carried out, and the day of the recovery exam.

The student may take the recovery tests provided that he/she has taken a set of activities that represent at least two-thirds of the total grade for the subject. Problems cannot be recovered.

The dates of continuous assessment and submission of work will be published on the virtual campus and may be subject to changes in programming for reasons of adaptation to possible incidents.

In the event of failing only one of the three subjects, and with a minimum of 3 in theory and 5 in practical in the failed subject, this failure will bevalidated with a fixed final grade of 4. To be eligible to validate the subject, the remaining two subjects must have a minimum of 6.

Grades for completed subjects (theory + practicals) from one course to another can be saved as long as the subject grade is at least 6, and the grade applied to the following course will be a 5.

Awarding an honours grade (MH) is the decision of the professor responsible for the subject. UAB regulations indicate that MHs can only be granted to students who have obtained a final grade equal to or greater than 9.00. Up to 5% of MHs can be awarded to the total number of students enrolled. They will be awarded according to the grade.

The student will receive a "Not Assessable" if they do not present any exam, any practical or any of the problems.

For each assessment activity, a place (can be online), date and time of review will be indicated where the student can review the activity with the professor. In this context, complaints about the activity grade may be made, which will be evaluated by the professor responsible for the subject. If the student does not attend this review, this activity will not be reviewed later.

Without prejudice to other disciplinary measures that may be deemed appropriate, and in accordance with current academic regulations, irregularities committed by a student that may lead to a variation in the grade in an assessable activity will be graded with a zero (0). Assessment activities graded in this way and by this procedure will not be recoverable. If it is necessary to pass any of these assessment activities to pass the subject, this subject will be directly suspended, with no opportunity to recover it in the same course. These irregularities include, among others:

• total or partial copying of a practice, report, or any other assessment activity;
• allowing copying;
• presenting a group work not done in its entirety by the members of the group (applied to all members, not just those who have not worked);
• unauthorized use of AI (e.g., Copilot, ChatGPT or equivalent) to solve exercises, practices and/or any other assessable activity;
• presenting as one's own materials prepared by a third party, even if they are translations or adaptations, and in general works with non-original and exclusive elements of the student;
• having communication devices (such as mobile phones, smart watches, camera pens, etc.) accessible during individual theoretical-practical evaluation tests (exams);
• talking to classmates during individual theoretical-practical evaluation tests (exams);
• copying or attempting to copy other students during theoretical-practical evaluation tests (exams);
• using or attempting to use writings related to the subject during the theoretical-practical evaluation tests (exams), when these have not been explicitly permitted.