Assessment

Continous Assessment Activities

Title	Weighting	Hours	ECTS	Learning Outcomes
0 D1. DEVELOPMENT1 of the project. Classroom exercises on the content of the text manual; written, in person; individual; first part of the course (weeks 1-8, distributed in two grades); feedback in the classroom and with rubric	1.5 (c)	0	0	3, 6, 7
1 P1. PROJECT1. Presentation of the draft report (some sections); written, virtual (moodle); group; expected beginning week 10; feedback in the classroom and with rubric	4 (b)	0	0	8, 3, 10, 11, 9, 4
2 T1. TEST1. Knowledge test, with reasoned answer (all the subjects content except TB5); written, in person; individual; 1st assessment period; feedback in the classroom	5 (b)	1.5	0.06	6
3 P2. PROJECT2. Final presentation of the report orally (P2i, in person, individual, expected week 13; feedback in classroom and with rubric) and written (P2g, virtual, group, expected start week 19, all sections, redone if necessary; feedback with rubric)	4 (a)	0	0	1, 2, 8, 3, 5, 7, 10, 11, 9, 12, 4
4 T2. TEST2. Knowledge test, with closed options and no arguments (all the subjects content); written, in person; individual; 2nd assessment period; feedback via personal mentoring	5 (a)	1.5	0.06	6

This subject has continuous evaluation with a clear formative function. Thus, second-chance examination is included in the development of the regular course and no recovery evaluation is contemplated at the end of it. 

Learning evidence should allow to assess three groups of learning outcomes:

1)    Knowledge, use of scoring criteria and interpretation of test scores, the ability to identify appropriate methods and techniques to assess the quality of measures, and the ability to identify the main models and techniques of psychometric analysis. Moreover, students who complete this course will be able to properly interpret the results obtained, and the critical application of the acquired knowledge. 

2)    Appropriate selection of psychological assessment instruments, drawing of conclusions, correct interpretation of the results obtained from the application of presented psychometric tests and the elaboration of reasoned conclusions based on the obtained results after applying the methods and psychometric techniques to answer a research hypothesis. 

3)    Maintain a favorable attitude towards permanent updating, and towards knowledge and application of code of ethics. 

Link to the guidelines of assessment of the faculty: https://www.uab.cat/web/estudiar/graus/graus/avaluacions-1345722525858.html

The presentation of the translation of the statements of the in-person assessment tests will be carried out if the requirements established in Article 263 of the academic regulations are met and the request is made in week 4 online (e-form) (more information on the faculty website).

 

LEARNING EVIDENCE BY CONTINOUS ASSESSMENT

The evaluation is structured in two blocks. The first block evaluates the knowledge of the theoretical part (up to 5 points) and the second block evaluates a project that consists in development task (upto 1.5 points) and the oral and written presentation of a report (up to 4 points). The maximum mark in the transcript will be 10 points. The evaluation of the theoretical part is done with face-to-face tests of closed or short answers. The project consists of a critical evaluation of a test manual.

The first block (TEST) consists in answering several tests reasoning the responses to demonstrate the psychometric knowledge acquired. There are two face-to face tests taken individually (TEST1 and TEST2). These TEST evidences are cumulative; in TEST2 there is a second-chance evaluation of TEST1 knowledge. 

TEST1. Performance of a knowledge test that includes the subject matter of the course already taught. It consists of a test with true/false choice questions and a justification of the answer. The points of this test are recoverable in TEST2.

TEST2. Performance of the test that includes the material of all the subjects of the course. It consists of a long test with true/false choice questions without justification of the answer. In this evidence the previous points (TEST1) are recoverable.

The marks for the TEST block are described at the end of this section.

The second block starts with the PROJECT DEVELOPMENT that aims to consolidate the psychometric knowledge that has been acquired applying it to the assessment of a test manual. During the in-person classes the teacher will propose exercises on the test manual that the student will have to solve and deliver in the same session. These exercises are delivered individually and will account for the evaluation of the first course topics. This evidence (DEVELOPMENT1) is a non-recovery evaluation.

This second block is completed with the PRESENTATION OF THE PROJECT REPORT, which consists in delivering and orally defending a standard document (COTAN)assessing a manual test to demonstrate the psychometric knowledge acquired during the course. Two writing tasks are presented (PROJECT1, PROJECT2), and in the second task an individual oral defense is also made. These PROJECT evidences are cumulative; the second task (PROJECT2) is presented  as a second-chance evaluation of the knowledge acquired in task 1 (PROJECT1), and the marks can be different for each student. 

PROJECT1. Presentation of the draft of the project report, which includes the assessment of the COTAN that matches the contents of the first part of the subject. It is done as a group project and is presented in written in moodle. The team receives feedback in their draft document and the mark is recoverable in PROJECT2.

PROJECT2. Oral defense and presentation of the final project report. The degree of knowledge of both the manual of the test and the evidence of interpretation of scores, validity, reliability and fairness that support it are assessed. The student makes an individual oral presentation in response to the teacher’s questions and the final report is presented in writing after completing all the sections and incorporating all suggestions received. The presentation and oral defense (P2i) are done on site in the practical classes. The presentation of the written text (P2g) is done collectively by each group through moodle. In this evidence, the previous points (PROJECT1) are recoverable as follows: 50% of the points correspond to the individual defense and the other 50% account for the final group report.

These evidences, PROJECT1 and PROJECT2, are evaluated by the teachers responsible for each project. The reports best evaluated in this part go through a phase of corrections in order to be included in the database of psychological instruments of the faculty and to be sent to the publisher of the test manual if interested.

On the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies, it is allowed documented. Specifically, the use of AI is allowed in this course as an integral part of the development of the project report, as long as the final result reflects a significant contribution of the student in the analysis and personal reflection. Students must clearly identify which parts have been generated or reviewed with this technology, specify the tools used, and include a critical reflection on the influence of AI on the process and final result of the corresponding learning evidence. Lack of transparency in the use of AI, failure to verify the accuracy of AI-generated statements, citation of nonexistent bibliographic references, or use of AI-generated data will be considered academic dishonesty. It will result in a penalty on the activity grade or higher penalties in serious cases.

The criterion for calculating the grade for each block (TEST andPROJECT) is asfollows: Within each block, if the grade obtained in the second evidence exceeds the grade of the first, the grade of the block is equal to the grade of the second evidence. On the other hand, if the grade of the second piece of evidence does not exceed that of the first, the  grade of the block is calculated with the average of both.

The results of the evidence will be discussed collectively in face-to-face sessions and may be reviewed in person in the tutoring sessions with the teacher responsible for the seminar group, both within two weeks after its completion (see the return type detail in the table of assessment activities).

 

DEFINITION OF PASSED COURSE

To pass the course you must meet three requirements within the same academic year: a) To have presented the evidence TEST2, b) To have presented the evidence PROJECT2, which includes P2i and P2g (if only one of the two is presented, the maximum possible grade is 1.9 for the total block), and c) to have accumulated a total of at least 5 points throughout the course, with a minimum of 2.0 points in the PRESENTATION OF THE PROJECT REPORT block (of the 4 possible) and a minimum of 2.0 points in the TEST block (of the 5 possible). If these requirements are not met, the maximum mark to be recorded in the academic transcript will be 4.5 points.

Resit is ongoing, where with evidences #2 the respective evidences #1 are reassessed, and no final resit system is foreseen.

The management of incidents with learning evidence and, especially, in the cases of students that despite the foreseen recovery along the course do not reach the required threshold, is done through personal interview with the teacher responsible for the seminar group.

 

DEFINITION OF NON-EVALUABLE STUDENTS

Students who have submitted evidence of learning with a weight equal to or greater than 4 points will be listed as "assessable". Otherwise, they will be non-evaluable.

 

SINGLE ASSESSMENT

This subject does not consider single assessment.

 

SECOND OR SUBSEQUENT ENROLLMENT STUDENTS

From the second enrollment, students have the same options as the rest. It is necessary to develop a new project and take the face-to-face tests. No synthesis test is planned.

 

In the table of assessment activities below we summarize the formal characteristics of the evaluation. [Note: (a) requirement to pass the subject; (b) reassessable; (c) non-recoverable]