Degree | Type | Year |
---|---|---|
Art History | OB | 3 |
You can view this information at the end of this document.
Given that this is a subject that is attended during the third year of the degree, the student must
to show solvency not only in the performance of the written tests, but also in the oral tests.
Likewise, the baggage of having previously attended two degree courses, with subjects ranging from the art of
Antiquity to the Baroque, going through the Renaissance, which should allow the student to have one
prior knowledge of the precedents and historical-artistic circumstances that precede and condition
somehow the characteristics and future of European art of the eighteenth century.
The subject offers a panoramic view of the new artistic Europe in the century
XVIII, time in which a definitive internationalization of the culture takes place. By analyzing the
various artistic manifestations and their creators, will try to influence the intellectual environment and the
permanent dichotomy rationalism-sensualism itself of the illustrated culture, which popularizes the "Grand
Tour "and the one who believes in the progress and happiness of the human being. In short, the subject must
provide knowledge about European art from the 18th century, establishing the differences, persistence, novelties
and contradictions between the late Baroque, Rococo and Neoclassicism, using the aesthetic, historical and
sociological ones that are more suitable to understanding the contents of the syllabus.
1. PARIS: FROM VERSALLES TO THE "SWEETEST LIFE"
-Versalles: architecture and gardens.
-Hôtels, 'maisons de plaisance' and 'folies'.
- Decorative objects: a new concept of interior design.
-The "rediscovery" of classicism: from Soufflot to the "revolutionary architects."
-The painting or the search for a new sensibility:
-The "Querelle des anciens et modernes". The Academie Royale and the Halls.
-The Rococo: Antoine Watteau, 'Fête Galant' and the 'Commedia dell'Arte'.
-Francois Boucher: sensuality and eroticism at the service of the ruling classes.
-The ambivalent universe of Jean-Honoré Fragonard.
-Encyclopedie as an antibarroque manifesto. Denis Diderot and the Arts Criticism. The everyday reality of
Chardin and the moralism of Greuze.
-The portrait: J. Rigau, N. Largillière, Quentin de la Tour (introduction of the technique to the cake by Rosalba Carriera),
Perronneau, Nattier. Women-artists: Adelaïde Labille-Guiard, Elisabeth Vigée-Lebrun.
* Queens and favorites; "salonnières" and illustrated: women as artistic committees.
2. ITALY: BETWEEN THE END OF BAROQUE AND NEOCLASSIC GENESIS
-Architecture: between classical and borrominan paradigms. Roman works.
-Outside of Rome: the Piemont architecture of Filippo Juvarra and Bernardo Vittone.
-The force of the south: Naples and Sicily.
-The painting: from the great muralists -Tiepolo- to Venice and "vedutisti".
-The "view" recorded by G.B. Piranesi, beyond the classical tradition. Painting "of the reality"
3. MIDDLE EUROPE AND RUSSIA
-Austria: Fischer von Erlach and Johan Lukas Hildebrandt.
-Bohemia: the Dientzenhofer and the influence of Guarino Guarini.
-Southern Germany: Balthasar Neumann, J.M. Fischer, J.B. Zimmermann. The decoration in stucco. TheAsam brothers.
-The illustrated princes of Prussia and Saxony.
-The monastic and palatine libraries.
-The "theatrical" architecture: from the Zwinger of Dresden to the theater of Bayreuth.
-Sant Petersburg: the European capital of the northern empire.
4. ENGLAND AND THE NORD-AMERICAN ECHO
-After the new London: The urbanism of Bath. The architecture of John Vanbrugh and Nicholas Hawksmoor:
following the Baroque tradition of Cristopher Wren. The palladianism and the 'Vitruvius Britannicus' by Colen Campbell.
Lord Burlington and William Kent. The English garden. The echo in the architecture and the urbanism of the United States
of America.
-The painting: Van Dyck's suggestion in the portraits of Joshsua Reynolds and Thomas Gainsborough.
William Hogarth and social criticism. The role of the 'Royal Academy'. Joseph Wright of Derby and science.
Title | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|
Type: Directed | |||
Master classes | 28 | 1.12 | 3, 4, 2, 12, 5, 1, 7, 10, 11, 13, 6, 14 |
Oral presentation in classroom | 12 | 0.48 | 3, 4, 2, 12, 5, 1, 7, 10, 11, 13, 6, 14 |
Type: Supervised | |||
Individual essay | 20 | 0.8 | 3, 4, 2, 12, 5, 1, 7, 10, 11, 13, 6 |
Type: Autonomous | |||
Individual study | 60 | 2.4 | 3, 4, 2, 12, 5, 1, 7, 10, 11, 13, 6, 14 |
Readings proposed by the teacher | 20 | 0.8 | 3, 4, 2, 12, 5, 1, 7, 10, 11, 13, 6 |
Visits to exhibitions and conference attendance | 10 | 0.4 | 3, 4, 2, 12, 5, 1, 7, 10, 11, 13, 6, 14 |
The methodology followed during the course will be a combination of master classes taught by the teacher (in a presential way or on line), suggested readings and possible visits to exhibitions or conferences given by experts. The oral presentations in classroom could be in a presential way or on line way.
Annotation: Within the schedule set by the centre or degree programme, 15 minutes of one class will be reserved for students to evaluate their lecturers and their courses or modules through questionnaires.
Title | Weighting | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
Oral presentation in the classroom | 20% | 0 | 0 | 9, 8, 14 |
Second exam (Text comment) | 30% | 0 | 0 | 3, 4, 2, 12, 5, 1, 7, 9, 10, 11, 13, 6, 8, 14 |
Written test | 50% | 0 | 0 | 3, 4, 2, 12, 5, 1, 7, 9, 10, 11, 13, 6, 8, 14 |
CONTINUOUS ASSESSMENT
The evaluation will be carried out by means of the computation of several evidences:
-The first will be a written test which will be worth 50% of the final mark.
-The second will be another written test (text commentary) which will be worth 30% of the final mark.
-The third will be an oral presentation in class, worth 20% of the final mark.
Any irregularity that may lead to a significant variation of the grade in the evaluation process will result in a grade of 0, regardless of the disciplinary process that may be instituted. In the event of several irregularities occurring in the assessment of the same subject, the final mark for this will be 0.
If a test is graded with a 4 or less, no average will be taken with the other evidences.
The dates of the evaluation tests will be agreed upon at the beginning of the academic year between teachers and students, respecting the official calendar.
If the tests cannot be taken in person, their format will be adapted (maintaining the weighted assessment) to the possibilities offered by the UAB's virtual tools. Homework, activities and participation in clae will be done through forums, wikis and/or debates through Teams, etc. The teaching staff will ensure that students can access this process or offer them alternative tools that are within their reach.
At the time of the completion of each assessment activity, the teacher will inform the students (Moodle) of the procedure and the date of revision of the marks.
SINGLE ASSESSMENT
The single assessment of this subject will be governed by the specific regulations approved by the UAB.
In order to obtain a favourable evaluation it is necessary to pass three evidences:
1. Written test of contents (50% of the final grade).
2. Second test (text commentary) which will account for 30% of the final mark.
3. Oral presentation (20% of the final mark).
The three tests will take place on the same date.
At the time of each assessment activity, the teacher will inform the students (Moodle) of the procedure and the date of revision of the marks.
If the indicated evidences are not submitted, the grade will be Not Evaluable.
RECOVERY
In order to participate in the recovery process, students must have been previously assessed in a set of activities, the weight of which must be equivalent to at least 2/3 of the total grade (CONTINUOUS ASSESSMENT) or have handed in all the tests (SINGLE ASSESSMENT).
In order to participate in the recovery process, the student must have obtained a final average grade of at least 3.5.
For the single assessment, the same recovery system will be applied as for the continuous assessment.
ABOUT THE USE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE: All evidence will be conducted in the classroom, so the use of artificial intelligence in any form is not allowed.
ARIÉS, Ph., Historia de la vida privada. Madrid: Taurus, 1988
BLACK, J: La Europa del siglo XVIII, Madrid, Akal, 1987.
BOIME, A: Historia social del arte moderno. I. El arte en la época de la Revolución, 1750-1800. Madrid.
BOMFORT, D; FINALDI, G: Venice through Canaletto's Eyes. London: National Gallery Publications, 1999.
CASSIRER, E., Filosofia de la Ilustración, Mèxic, 1973 (1932).
CROW, T: Pintura y sociedad en el Paris del siglo XVIII. Madrid, Nerea, 1989 (1985).
DIDEROT, D.: Escritos sobre el arte. Madrid, Siruela, 1994.
GALL, J. y F., La pintura galante, FCE, Mèxic, 1978 (1963).
GOMBRICH, E.H., The Ideas of Progress and their impact on art. Nueva York: 1971.
HASKELL, F., Patronos y Pintores.Madrid, Cátedra, 1984 (1963).
HAZARD, P: El pensamiento europeo en el siglo XVIII. De Montesquieu a Lessing. Madrid, Alianza, 1985
HONOUR, H.: Neoclasicismo, Madrid, Xarait, 1982.
KAUFMANN, E: La arquitectura de la Ilustración, Barroco y postbarroco en Inglaterra, Italia y Francia. Barcelona: Gustavo Gili, 1980.
LEVEY, M.: Pintura y escultura en Francia, 1700-1789, Madrid, Cátedra, 1994.
LEVEY, M., Du Rococo a la Revolution, Londres, 1989 (ed. ang. 1966).
MINGUET, Ph.: Estética del Rococó. Cátedra, 1992 (1966).
NORBERG SCHULZ, C.: Arquitectura barroca tardía y rococó, Madrid, Aguilar, 1973.
PÉROUSE DE MONTCLOS, J.M : Histoire de l'Architecture Française. De la Renaissance a la Révolution, Paris,1989.
PERRY, G., ROSSINGTON, M., (Edits): Feminity and masculinityin eighteenth-century art and culture. Manchester-New York, Manchester University Press, 199
ROSENBLUM, Robert, Tranformaciones en el arte de finales del siglo XVIII, Madrid, Taurus, 1986.
SCHONBERGER, A., H. SOEHNER, H.: El Rococó y su época, Barcelona, (1958) 1971.
STAROBINSKI, J:La invención de la libertad, 1700-1789. Barcelona: 1964.
STAROBINSKI, J.: 1789, los emblemas de la razón, Taurus, 1988 (1973).
SUMMERSON, J.: Architecture in Britain, 1530-1830, Harmondsworth, Pelikan, 1983.
TATARKIEWICZ, W., Historia de seis ideas. Madrid: Tecnos, 1992 (1976).
VIDLER, A: El Espacio de la Ilustración : la teoría arquitectónica en Francia a finales del siglo XVIII. Madrid, Alianza, 1997.
WATERHOUSE, E: Pintura en Gran Bretaña, 1530-1790, Madrid, Cátedra, 1994.
VIÑAMATA, Àgueda: El rococó. Arte y vida en la primera mitad del siglo XVIII, Montesinos, Barcelona, 1987.
WITTKOWER, R: Arte y Arquitectura en Italia, 1600-1750, Madrid, Cátedra, 1983.
https://bibcercador.uab.cat/discovery/search?query=any,contains,palacio%20versalles&tab=Everything&search_scope=MyInst_and_CI&vid=34CSUC_UAB:VU1&offset=0https://bibcercador.uab.cat/discovery/search?
The learning activities and the dates for the completion of the tasks will be communicated at the beginning of the academic year.
Please note that this information is provisional until 30 November 2025. You can check it through this link. To consult the language you will need to enter the CODE of the subject.
Name | Group | Language | Semester | Turn |
---|---|---|---|---|
(PAUL) Classroom practices | 1 | Catalan | first semester | morning-mixed |
(TE) Theory | 1 | Catalan | first semester | morning-mixed |