Degree | Type | Year |
---|---|---|
4316493 Journalism and Digital Content Innovation | OB | 0 |
You can view this information at the end of this document.
In the development of the module, the student is required to carry out a guided and supervised research (by a Ph.D. holder) that addresses a specific question or questions on a topic within one of the research areas outlined in the Master's program and aligns with the research lines of one of the research groups in the Department. The module aims to enable the student to present and defend their work before an evaluating committee. The research work should result in a non-trivial contribution to the applied knowledge in the Master's program, specifically in the field of communication sciences.
The objective of the module is to initiate students in conducting research and provide them with the opportunity to acquire the necessary experience to potentially pursue future doctoral research if they are interested.
Title | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|
Type: Directed | |||
Academic Tutories | 5 | 0.2 | 1, 3, 8, 20, 23, 28 |
Type: Supervised | |||
Preparation of works/reports | 20 | 0.8 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 11, 17, 18, 20, 21, 22, 23, 25, 26, 27, 28 |
Type: Autonomous | |||
Elaboration of the Master's Final Treball | 200 | 8 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 11, 17, 18, 20, 21, 22, 23, 25, 26, 27, 28 |
Annotation: Within the schedule set by the centre or degree programme, 15 minutes of one class will be reserved for students to evaluate their lecturers and their courses or modules through questionnaires.
Title | Weighting | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
Completion and submission of the Master's Final Project | 90 | 0 | 0 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28 |
Oral presentation of the Final Master's Project | 10 | 0 | 0 | 4, 8, 9, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 19, 20, 24, 28 |
The Master dissertations will be submitted on the date established for each academic year, which, as a general rule, is the last working day of the fourth week of June, in electronic format (PDF) according to the instructions on the Faculty's website. They should be sent to the following recipients:
The evaluation of the TFM will be carried out by an evaluation committee consisting of three Ph.D. holders. The TFM tutor is required to provide a report evaluating the TFM, which will be directed to the committee members. If the TFM does not have the tutor's report, the student cannot defend the TFM before the evaluation committee. The committee will deliver the defense minutes and final grade to the coordination, which will enter the grades into Sigma. Once the grades have been entered, they will be made public to the students. Finally, the custody of the defense minutes of the TFM is the responsibility of the academic management.
The defense before the committee will take place during the month of July, on a date assigned each year. The defense of the work is a requirement established by the state regulations regarding the TFM. Failure to attend the defense before the committee will result in a "Not Evaluable" grade.
There is no reevaluation in any of the TFM sessions. This is an agreement of the Faculty Board on February 28, 2014.
The public defense of the work will take place during the first half of July, on a specific date determined by the Master's Committee and announced to the students during the welcome meeting of the corresponding course. Dissertations awarded a grade of 10 will be examined by a committee of three members chosen by the Master's Committee, who will award the corresponding honors, if applicable.
The Master's final work must be original and must specifically reference all sources, both direct and indirect, that have been used as inspiration and/or basis. Citations should be included in the text following the APA system (https://ddd.uab.cat/record/113512).
The evaluation of the TFM will be governed by the assessment criteria established by the AQU (available at http://www.aqu.cat/doc/doc_18533565_1.pdf) to ensure a homogeneous process of identifying the acquired competencies.
In the event of disagreement with the final grade of the TFM, an extraordinary review can be requested, which will be carried out by faculty members who have not been involved in the correction of the TFM. Once the minutes have been finalized, the request must be submitted to the Academic Management of the Faculty, providing arguments regarding specific aspects of the TFM that, in theopinion of the claimant, have not been adequately evaluated by the committee. Incoherent, unjustified, or poorly argued requests will be directly dismissed.
Plagiarism: According to Article 116.10 of the UAB's academic regulations, "If a student commits any irregularity that could lead to a significant alteration of the grade for an evaluation activity, the grade for that activity will be 0, regardless of any disciplinary
There is no specific software for this subject.
Information on the teaching languages can be checked on the CONTENTS section of the guide.