Degree | Type | Year |
---|---|---|
4313781 Enterprise Law | OT | 0 |
You can view this information at the end of this document.
There are no previous requirements.
To achieve pecialized knowledge on issues related to the maritime business.
The module analyzes some specific issues of maritime Law, such as the figure of the shipowner (legal nature, limitation of liability), its dependents, the maritime contracts (chartering, bareboat charter, passengers), accidents at navigation (collision, average, pollution), from the perspective of national, European and international law, as well as the practice and uses of the sea.Any changes will be communicated at the beginning of the course.
Title | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|
Type: Directed | |||
Classroom lectures | 36 | 1.44 | 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 |
Type: Supervised | |||
Resolution of exercises | 10 | 0.4 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 |
Type: Autonomous | |||
Personal study | 54 | 2.16 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 |
Lecturers responsible for each group will plan at the beginning of the course the theoretical sessions and the most practical sessions where discussion seminars, practical cases, comments, text, etc. will be developed.
Annotation: Within the schedule set by the centre or degree programme, 15 minutes of one class will be reserved for students to evaluate their lecturers and their courses or modules through questionnaires.
Title | Weighting | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
Attendace and active participation in class | 40% | 36 | 1.44 | 2, 6, 7 |
Resolution of exercises | 60% | 14 | 0.56 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 |
The evaluation of the subject will be carried out by means of a final test on the set of the syllabus of the subject at the end of the course (50% grade) and the different practices that will be carried out throughout the course (50% of the grade).
Once the evaluation has been communicated, a review may be requested so that the Professor explains to the student the applied criteria (art. 114.3 UAB academic regulations), without prejudice to the student's rights to challenge the grade.
The date of the final exam of the subject is scheduled in the exam calendar of the Faculty.
The scheduling of the evaluation tests cannot be modified, unless there is an exceptional and duly justified reason why an evaluation act cannot be carried out. In this case, the people responsible for the degrees, after consulting the teachers and the affected students, will propose a new schedule within the corresponding school period (art. 115.1 Calendar of evaluation activities, UAB Academic Regulations)
To pass the course, the student must have participated in the three evaluation activities and have obtained at least a 3.5 in the final exam. To take the final exam, it is necessary to prove attendance to 90% of the classes.
Only the reevaluation of the test is possible (50%). The continuous assessment activities cannot be reevaluated, since their meaning is to check the knowledge progressively acquired throughout the course, notwithstanding that in case of illness or other eventualities an alternative solution may be found for the specifically affected student.
To retake the exam, student must have obtained at least a 3 in each of the three evaluation activities. Students who take the reevaluation exam may obtain a maximum grade of 7 in the subject.
It will be considered that a student who participates in any of the continuous evaluation activities will no longer be eligible for a “non-evaluable” status.
This subject/module does not provide for a singleevaluation system.
GABALDÓN GARCÍA, José Luis: Curso de derecho marítimo internacional. Derecho marítimo internacional público y privado y contratos marítimos internacionales, Marcial Pons, Barcelona-Madrid-Buenos Aires, 2012.
GABALDÓN GARCÍA, José Luis y RUIZ SOROA, José María: Manual de Derecho de la navegación marítima, 3ª edición, Marcial Pons, Barcelona-Madrid, 2006.
GIRGADO, Pablo, “Los seguros marítimos y la valoración convencional del interés asegurado”, en GARCÍA-PITA, Estudios de derecho marítimo, Aranzadi, Cizur Menor, pp. 1015-1034.
MARTÍN OSANTE, José Manuel, “Responsabilidad del naviero en vía civil y en vía penal: algunas diferencias”, en La Ley, núm. 1, 2005, pp. 191-201.
PULIDO BEGINES, Juan Luis: Instituciones de Derecho de la navegación marítima, Tecnos, Madrid, 2009.
PULIDO BEGINES, Juan Luis: Curso de Derecho de la navegación marítima, Tecnos, Madrid, 2015.
RUIZ SOROA, José María, “Los créditos marítimos privilegiados y el concurso de acreedores”, en Revista de Derecho concursal y paraconcursal, núm. 6, 2007, pp. 119-130.
SALINAS ADELANTADO, Carlos, Curso de Derecho Marítimo, Tirant lo Blanch, Valencia, 2021.
The subject does not require any specific software.
Name | Group | Language | Semester | Turn |
---|---|---|---|---|
(TEm) Theory (master) | 1 | Spanish | second semester | afternoon |