Degree | Type | Year |
---|---|---|
4313774 Terrestrial Ecology and Biodiversity Management | OT | 0 |
You can view this information at the end of this document.
A working knowledge of the material of the course “Bases for the management and conservation of biodiversity” is required
There are many perspectives about the management of the fauna, and this module will address several of them. One of the best known is the management of threatened wildlife. In the module “Bases for the Management and Conservation of Biodiversity”, the student acquires a basis to understand and to analyze the different strategies of conservation of threatened fauna. The objective of this module is to provide the student with a deeper knowledge and experience on wildlife conservation from the practical point of view. To do this, we will study various cases of wildlife conservation programs given by professionals from the administration and other institutions that are carrying out wildlife management and conservation programs in our closest environment. Likewise, the aim is to introduce the student to the study and analysis of hunting management and the health problems that it entails, as well as fishery management in the marine environment. In both cases, we will explain the theoretical bases of management and we will give to the student the tools for the development of the strategies used for this management. Finally, the module also analyzes two applications of the fauna. On the one hand, we study the use of animals (predators, parasitoids and entomopathogens) as biological control agents both within the framework of agroecosystems with Integrated Pest Management and with organic production. On the other hand, we will analyze the fauna as bioindicator, with special emphasis on fauna as a bioindicator of environmental stress.
1. Fauna Management:
1.1. Hunting Management and health problems:
1.2. Fisheries management in the marine environment:
2. Threatened Fauna Management:
2.1. Experiences in management of threatened fauna: Conferences and debates with specialists in fauna management in Catalonia:
3. Fauna Applications:
3.1. Animals as biological pests control agents:
3.2. The fauna in relation to the quality of the habitat:
Title | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|
Type: Directed | |||
Field work | 12 | 0.48 | 3, 4, 7 |
Lectures | 17 | 0.68 | 2, 4, 5, 6, 7 |
Specialized seminars | 12 | 0.48 | 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 |
Type: Supervised | |||
Tutorials | 6 | 0.24 | 1, 2, 5, 6 |
Type: Autonomous | |||
Personal study and self-learning work | 57 | 2.28 | 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 |
Prepare individual works | 45 | 1.8 | 1, 2, 5, 6, 8 |
Several teaching-learning strategies will be combined in order to achieve the objectives of the course: lectures, seminars, case study, field practices.
Throughout the module the students will carry out supervised works. The works will be focused on the resolution of practical case studies and a report on the case.
The elaboration of the report of the case study will be done through scheduled tutorial sessions.
There will be two field practices and four sessions of specialized seminars on wildlife conservation cases.
1. Report of the case study: every five students will solve a case. There will be 3 cases to choose, one per group.
The adjudication of the case will be made by order of request to Fernando.Garcia@uab.cat. In the request for each case, the name of the two students who will work together and a list of 2 cases in order of preference must be included.
The report to be presented will consist of the answers to the questions of each case, perfectly documented with the consulted bibliography (maximum 5 pages- at 1.5 spacing; "Times New Roman" type font, size 12- including the bibliography consulted ).
The students, on the date indicated, must deliver the report of the case to their corresponding tutor.
Subsequently, a seminar will be held for the presentation and discussion of the three cases, following the Aronson's jigsaw a co-operative teaching and learning technique, adapted to the specific situation of each case study. At the end of the activity, there will be an evaluative test on the three cases
2. Questionnaires about field practices and seminars on fauna conservation cases: an evaluation activity will be carried out of each field practice and seminar.
3. Written exam with short questions.
Annotation: Within the schedule set by the centre or degree programme, 15 minutes of one class will be reserved for students to evaluate their lecturers and their courses or modules through questionnaires.
Title | Weighting | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
Attendance to class and participation | 10% | 0 | 0 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 |
Exam | 35% | 1 | 0.04 | 2, 4, 5, 6, 7 |
Questionaries about field practices and seminars | 25% | 0 | 0 | 2, 3, 4 |
Report and presentation of the case | 30% | 0 | 0 | 1, 2, 5, 6, 8 |
There is a continuous evaluation process throughout the course that includes more than three evaluation activities, of different typologies, distributed throughout the course, and none of the activities represents more than 50% of the final grade.
The evaluation is based on the following elements:
1.- Report and presentacion of the case
The evaluation of this part is based on the following elements:
This evaluation has a global weight of 30% of the final grade (20% written work + 10% evaluative test from the seminar)
IMPORTANT: in order to be able to do the average with the rest of the evaluable activities, it is necessary to obtain a final minimum mark of the exams of 4
2.- Reports of field practices and seminars
This evaluation has a global weight of 25% of the final grade.
IMPORTANT: in order to be able to do the average with the rest of the evaluable activities, it is necessary to obtain a final minimum mark of the exams of 4
3.- Exam with short questions
IMPORTANT: in order to be able to do the average with the rest of the evaluable activities, it is necessary to obtain a final minimum mark of the exams of 4
This evaluation has a global weight of 35% of the final grade.
4.- Attendance to class and participation
This evaluation has a global weight of 10% of the final grade.
IMPORTANT: in order to be able to do the average with the rest of the evaluable activities, it is necessary to attend 80% of all academic activities
The minimum global qualification required to pass the subject will be 5 out of 10. To be eligible for the retake process, the student should have been previously evaluated ina set of activities equaling at least two thirds of the final score of the course or module. Thus, the student will be graded as "No Avaluable" if the weighthin of all conducted evaluation activities is less than 67% of the final score.
Single assessment:
The single assessment consists of a single summary test in which the contents of the entire theory program of the subject will be assessed. The single assessment test will coincide with the same date fixed in the calendar for the last continuous assessment test and the same recovery system will be applied as for the continuous assessment.
Students who take the single assessment must do the field practices in face-to-face sessions. Attendance at the oral defence session of the practices and the seminars will also be compulsory.
The assessment of PCAM, PAUL SEM and VTEX will follow the same procedure as the continuous assessment.
Plagiarism: In the event of a student committing any irregularity that may lead to a significant variation in the grade awarded to an assessment activity, the student will be given a zero for this activity, regardless of any disciplinary process that may take place. In the event of several irregularities in assessment activities of the same subject, the student will be given a zero as the final grade for this subject.
- Bas, C. 2002. El Mediterráneo: Recursos vivos y explotación. Ed. Ariel Ciencia. Edición actualizada (2006)
- Bellés, X. 1995. Entendre la Biodiversitat. Ed. Magrana. Barcelona
- Eilenberg, J., Hokkanen, H.M.T. 2007. An ecological and societal approach to Biological Control. Springer Ed. 322 pp.
- FAO SOFIA Report, 2006. The state of world fisheries and aquaculture, disponible en http://www.fao.org/fishery
- Fränzle, O. 2005. Complex bioindication and environmental stress assessment. Ecological Indicators 6: 144-136.
- Hadlik, C.M.; Hadlik, A.; Linares, O.F.; Pagezy H. et al. 1993. Tropical forests, perople and food: Biocultural interactions and applications to development. UNESCO/Parthenon Publ. Vol. 15 in Man and the Biosphere Series, Paris.
- Hajek, A. 2004. Natural Enemies: an introduction to biological control. Cambridge University Press. UK. 378 pp.
- Hokkanen, H., Lynch, M.J. 2003. Biological control benefits and risks. Cambridge University Press. UK. 304 pp.
- Jacas, J., Caballero, P. Avilla, J. 2005. El control Biologico de plagas y enfermedades. Universitat Jaume I. Castellon de la Plana. 223 pp.
- Lleonart, J. et al.. 1986. L'Oceanografia II. Recursos pesquers de la mar catalana. Quaderns d'Ecologia Aplicada, no 9. Diputació de Barcelona.
- Martí et al., 2007. Indicators guidelines. To adopt an indicators-based approacg to evaluate coastal sustainable development. Government of Catalonia. Barcelona.
- Mayor, P.; Santos D.; Lopez-Bejar, M. 2007. Sostenibilidad en la Amazonía y cría de animales silvestres. CETA, Iquitos, Peru.
- Pineda et al. 2002. La diversidad biológica de España. Prentice Hall. Madrid.
- Robinson, J.G.; Redford, K.H. 1991. Neotropical wildlife use and conservation. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
- Tudela, S. 2004. Ecosystem effects of fishing in the Mediterranean. FAOGFCM Studies and Reviews No. 74; disponible también en http://www.fao.org/fishery
- Vicent, C., Goettel, M.S., Lazarovits. 2007. Biological Control a global perspective. CABI Ed. London. 440 pp.
Microsoft Office
Name | Group | Language | Semester | Turn |
---|---|---|---|---|
(PCAMm) Field practices (master) | 1 | Catalan/Spanish | first semester | morning-mixed |
(SEMm) Seminars (master) | 1 | Spanish | first semester | morning-mixed |
(TEm) Theory (master) | 1 | Catalan/Spanish | first semester | morning-mixed |