This subject/module does not offer the option for comprehensive evaluation.

The evaluation of the subject consists of three parts: Theory, Problems and Practices. The evaluation of the part of Theory represents 60% of the final mark of the subject, Problems represents 10% and Practices the remaining 30%.

The evaluation of each of the different parts is detailed below:

Theory:

The evaluation of the theory part will consist of two partial tests (or controls). The day that each of these tests is carried out, as well as the content to be evaluated will be indicated in the planning sheets of the subject (schedule). The theory note will be obtained from the weighted average of the two theory tests, depending on the extent of the subject included. To do this, you must have a minimum of 3.5 for each of the controls.

Note that on the day of the second test the first test can not be retrieved.

Problems:

There will be sessions of problems that will be evaluable. In these sessions (they will be done during the expected hours of problems), an exercise will be given that students will have to solve individually during the session. Subsequently, the problem professor will correct these tests and publish the notes (individually) on the Virtual Campus. The realization of these tests is not obligatory to pass the subject. therefore they are not recoverable in case of not being able to attend. The dates of these tests will be indicated in the timetable of the subject.

Practices:

The attendance and punctuality in all practical sessions is mandatory for all the members of the group, to overcome them.

The assistance to ALL practical sessions is also mandatory, as well as its correct functioning, the verification of the responsible professor, respond satisfactorily to the questions of the professor, and the presentation of a written memory, all this individually, detailing:

-  Purpose of the practice

-  Description andapproach of the practice (Organization chart, pseudo code)

-  Description of the problems that arise during the execution of the practice and the solutions found.

-  Conclusions extracted from the realization of the practice

-  Source code of the practice.

-  Compilation procedures with the description of the options that allow the teacher to obtain the executable from the source code.

 There will be an exam in the last session for the students determined by the teacher.

Except in problems, a minimum grade of 5 is necessary for each part of the subject to be approved. On the other hand, it is imperative that the average of the three notes be at least 5 to pass the subject. For example, one of 8 theory and a 4 practice (or vice versa) do NOT allow to pass the subject. Regarding the problems simply adds the weighted note obtained.

Students who do not pass the subject due to not having obtained a minimum of 5 somewhere but the average is more than 5, will be qualified with a 4 final grade. For example, a theory 8, a 7 problem and a 3 practice session will have a final grade of 4, and will be able to enter the recovery process that is described below.

Honor certificates

 The granting of honor certificates is the sole criterion of the responsible professors and in any case they can establish a specific test to grant them

Important:

Given that the evaluation methodology is continued, the fact that any delivery of any evaluable evidence is carried out (exercise, evidence, practices ...) is interpreted as the express will on the part of the student to present themselves at Subject and therefore have a different note from "Not Evaluable". An NA rating can only be obtained without having submitted any evaluableevidence throughout the course.

It should be noted that in all areas, but especiallythe university, an essential piece is the correct formal expression, both oral and written.Therefore, thiswill be part of the evaluation of all the exercises and will be penalized up to maximum of 20% of the qualification for each document of evaluable evidence. Spell mistakes and other incorrections in the expression as well as inappropriate presentation will be considered at the teacher's discretion.

Calendar of evaluation activities

The dates of the different evaluation tests (partial exams, exercises, work delivery, ...) will be announced sufficiently in advance during the semester.

The date of the final proof of the subject is programmed in the exam calendar of the Faculty.

"The programming of the evaluation tests cannot be modified, unless there is an exceptional and duly justified reason for which an evaluation act cannot be carried out. In this case, the people responsible for the qualifications, after consulting the teachers and students affected will propose a new programming within the corresponding teaching period. " Section 1 of Article 115. Calendar of evaluation activities (Academic Regulations UAB)