Assessment

Continous Assessment Activities

Title	Weighting	Hours	ECTS	Learning Outcomes
Activity 1. Implementation of a data acquisition system	10%	2	0.08	1, 2, 3, 4, 7
Activity 2. Data recording system	10%	2	0.08	1, 2, 3, 4, 7
Activity 3. Online monitoring	10%	2	0.08	1, 2, 3, 4, 7
Activity 4. Control loop implementation	10%	2	0.08	1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7
Activity 5. Tuning of a control loop	10%	2	0.08	1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7
Activity 6. SCADA	10%	2	0.08	1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7
Activity 7. Programmable logic controller	10%	2	0.08	1, 2, 3, 7
Activity 8. Oral defence of the work done	30%	1	0.04	1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6

a) Planned assessment process and activities

The evaluation activities of the subject are detailed below, with their percentage of weight in the final grade:

• Activity 1 (10%, in group). Implementation of a data acquisition system.
• Activity 2 (10%, in group). Data recording system.
• Activity 3 (10%, in group). Online monitoring.
• Activity 4 (10%, in group). Control loop implementation.
• Activity 5 (10%, in group). Tuning of a control loop.
• Activity 6 (10%, in group). Supervisory control.
• Activity 7 (10%, as a group). Programmable logic controller.
• Activity 8 (30%, individual). Oral defence of the work done.

To apply the calculation of the final mark, a minimum mark of 4 in activity 8 is required.
If this criterion is not met, the maximum final mark for the course will be 4.0.
Failure to attend class when taking assessment tests will result in a zero for the activity, with no possibility of recovery.

b) Scheduling of assessment activities

The schedule of assessment activities will be given on the first day of the course and will be published on the Virtual Campus.

c) Recovery process

Students may sit the make-up exam provided that they have submitted a set of activities that represent a minimum of two thirds of the total grade for the subject.
A minimum of 4.0 in Activity 8 will be required. If this criterion is not met, the maximum final grade for the course will be 4.0.
In agreement with the coordination of the Degree and the management of the School of Engineering, the following activities cannot be recovered: evaluative activities of any kind in which the student has committed an irregularity (copying, plagiarising, allowing copying).

d) Procedure for the revision of grades

For each assessment activity, a place, date and time of review will be indicated where students can review the activity with the teacher. In this context, claims maybe made about the grade of the activity, which will be evaluated by the lecturer responsible for the subject. If the student does not attend this review, the activity will not be reviewed later.

e) Grades

Honours. It is the decision of the lecturers responsible for the subject to award an honours degree (MH). UAB regulations state that MH may only be awarded to students who have obtained a final grade of 9.00 or higher. Up to 5% of the total number of students enrolled may be awarded MH.
A student will be considered non-assessable (NA) if he/she has not appeared in a set of activities whose weight equals a minimum of two thirds of the total grade of the subject.

f) Irregularities on the part of students, copying and plagiarism

Without prejudice to other disciplinary measures that may be considered appropriate, irregularities committed by the student that may lead to a variation in the grade of an evaluation act will be graded with a zero. Therefore, copying, plagiarism, cheating, allowing copying, etc. in any of the assessment activities will result in a zero. Assessment activities graded in this way and by this procedure will not be recoverable.

g) Evaluation of repeating students

There are no changes with respect to new students.

h) Single assessment

This subject does not offer a single assessment.