Assessment

Continous Assessment Activities

Title	Weighting	Hours	ECTS	Learning Outcomes
Final test	45	4	0.16	1
Lab skills	45	0	0	1
Written reports of the practices	45	0	0	1

Scheduled evaluation process and activities

The evaluation of block 1 and 2 (see contents) will consist of three sections:

• Reports of the practices: Preparation and presentation of reports that include the experimental planning, the results obtained and their critical analysis. These reports will be done by work groups in the laboratory (45%).
• Final test: Individual written exam on the theoretical and experimental contents of the practices carried out. You must obtain a minimum of 4 / 10 to choose to pass the subject (45%)
• Laboratory skills: Assessment of attitude and compliance with work standards in the laboratory (10%).

In block 1&2 (see contents), attendance at scheduled practice sessions and presentation of reports are required to pass the subject. As the subject is eminently practical, all sections of block 1&2 are Non-recoverable.

If any of the following circumstances occurs, it implies a non-assessable rating both blocks:

• No attendance at scheduled practice sessions
• No presentation of internship reports
• Failing to take the final test (written test)

In block 1&2 no grades are saved for the next course.

Each block (1 and 2) will be evaluated separately and the final grade of the subject will be the average of the two blocks (1 and 2)

Programming evaluation activities

At the beginning of the subject groups will be formed to do laboratory practices. The delivery of the internship reports will be communicated through the virtual campus.

Recovery process

As the subject is eminently practical, all sections of blocks 1&2 are Non-recoverable.

Procedure for review of qualifications

For each evaluation activity, a place, date and time of revision in which the studentcan review the activity with theteacher will be indicated. In this context, claims may be made on the activity grade, whichwill be evaluated by the faculty responsible for the subject. If the student does not appear in this review, this activity will not be reviewed later.

Ratings

Granting a grade of honor registration is the decision of the faculty responsible for the subject. The regulations of the UAB indicate that MH can only be granted to students who have obtained a final grade equal to or greater than 9.00. You can grant up to 5% of MH of the total number of students enrolled.

Irregularities by the student, copy and plagiarism

Without prejudice to other disciplinary measures deemed appropriate, the irregularities committed by the student that may lead to a variation of the grade of an evaluation act will be scored with a zero. Therefore, copying, plagiarism, cheating, letting copy, etc. in any of the evaluation activities will involve suspending with a zero. The evaluation activities qualified in this way and by this procedure will not be recoverable. If it is necessary to pass any of these evaluation activities to pass the subject, this subject will be suspended directly, without the opportunity to recover it in the same course. In this situation the final grade that will be reflected in the minutes will be a 2.

Evaluation of repeating students

There is no provision for a different evaluation system for repeating students.