Degree | Type | Year |
---|---|---|
2503868 Communication in Organisations | FB | 2 |
You can view this information at the end of this document.
None
Archives and Records Management will be in charge of:
Topic 1. Fundamentals of Records Management and Archives.
Topic 2. Information and records.
Topic 3. Records management systems and document life cycle.
Topic 4. Transparency and access to information.
Topic 5. Spanish and Catalan archives.
Topic 6. Access to archives.
Topic 7. image and audiovisual files
Title | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|
Type: Directed | |||
Lectures, debates and discussions in class | 45 | 1.8 | 4, 7, 11, 10, 8, 16, 9 |
Type: Supervised | |||
Exercises to be performed in class and outside class | 29 | 1.16 | 3, 4, 5, 7, 6, 8, 12, 16, 9 |
Type: Autonomous | |||
Reading literature and materials | 35 | 1.4 | 3, 4, 7, 11, 10, 8, 16, 17, 9 |
Written assignments | 35 | 1.4 | 3, 4, 5, 11, 6, 12, 17 |
To achieve the established objectives, this subject involves both lectures and practical classes.
Students must keep abreast of the news and information published on the Virtual Campus / Moodle.
The work students carry out mainly consists of lectures, debates and discussions in class, individual/group presentations in class, reading assignments, written assignments, exercises to be performed in class and outside class, and exams.
Some exercises will be individuals and other in groups.
Annotation: Within the schedule set by the centre or degree programme, 15 minutes of one class will be reserved for students to evaluate their lecturers and their courses or modules through questionnaires.
Title | Weighting | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
Exam | 40% | 2 | 0.08 | 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 11, 10, 8, 16, 9 |
Practical exercises | 35% | 2 | 0.08 | 1, 2, 3, 10, 6, 8, 12, 13, 14, 15, 17 |
Work assignment | 25% | 2 | 0.08 | 1, 2, 3, 6, 8, 12, 13, 14, 15, 17 |
Assessment is continuous. Single assessment is not considered.
Students must provide evidence of their progress by completing various tasks. It is necessary to obtain a minimum grade of 5 in the global evaluation and obtaining a minimum of 4 in the exam. To grade practical exercises, students must present a minimum of 4 activities. Students who complete 3 or fewer practical exercises will get a 0 in the rating corresponding to this part of the evaluation.
The calendar will be available on the first day of class. Students will find all information on the Virtual Campus: the description of the activities, teaching materials, and any necessary information for the proper follow-up of the subject.
Review
When publishing final marks prior to recording them on students' transcripts, the lecturer will provide written notification of a date and time for reviewing assessment activities. Students must arrange reviews in agreement with the lecturer.
Missed/failed assessment activities
Students may retake assessment activities they have failed or compensate for any they have missed, provided that those they have actually performed account for a minimum of 66.6% (two thirds) of the subject's final mark and that they have a weighted average mark of at least 3.5. Under no circumstances may an assessment activity worth 100% of the final mark be retaken or compensated for.
The lecturer will inform students of the procedure involved, in writing, when publishing final marks prior to recording them on transcripts. The lecturer may set one assignment per failed or missed assessment activity or a single assignment to cover a number of such activities.
Classification as "not assessable"
In the event of the assessment activitiesa student has performed accounting for just 25% or less of the subject's final mark, their work will be classified as "not assessable" on their transcript.
Second enrolment
In the case of a second enrolment, students can do a single synthesis exam/assignment that will consist of an theory and practical exam. The grading of the subject will correspond to the grade of the synthesis exam/assignment.
Misconduct in assessment activities
Students who engage in misconduct (plagiarism, copying, personation, etc.) in an assessment activity will receive a mark of “0” for the activity in question. In the case of misconduct in more than one assessment activity, the students involved will be given a final mark of “0” for the subject.
Students may not retake assessment activities in which they are found to have engaged in misconduct. Plagiarism is considered to mean presenting all or part of an author's work, whether published in print or in digital format, as one's own, i.e. without citing it. Copying is considered to mean reproducing all or a substantial part of another student's work. In cases of copying in which it is impossible to determine which of two students has copied the work of the other, both will be penalised.
BUSTELO, Carlota (2009). La Gestión de documentos y las evidencias en las organizaciones. Del plano operativo al plano estratégico: una propuesta desde la normalización. Revista Española de Documentación Científica, 32(4), 157–161.
CAPELL, Emilia; COROMINAS, Mariona (coords.) (2009). Manual d'arxivística i gestió de documents. Barcelona: Associació d'Arxivers de Catalunya.
CRUZ MUNDET, Jose Ramon (2006). La gestión de documentos en las organizaciones. Madrid: Pirámide.
DURANTI, Luciana, FRANKS, Patricia C (eds.) (2015). Encyclopedia of Archival Science. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
DURANTI, L. (ed.) (2019). Trusting Records and Data in the Cloud: The Creation, Management, and Preservation of Trustworthy Digital Content. London: Facet Publishing. http://doi.org/10.29085/9781783304042.
FERNÁNDEZ RAMOS, Severiano; Sierra rodríguez, Javier (eds.) ( 2019). Transparencia y Lucha Contra La Corrupción. Las Rozas, Madrid : Wolters Kluwer,.CASTELLS M. (2005). La era de la información: Economía, sociedad y cultura I. La sociedad red. ISBN-10: 8420677000
GONZÁLEZ PEDRAZA, José Andrés (2009). Los archivos de empresas. Qué son y cómo se tratan. Gijón: Ediciones Trea.
GONZÁLEZ QUINTANA, Antonio; Gálvez Biesca, Sergio; Castro Berrojo, Luis (2019). El Acceso a Los Archivos En España. Fundación Francisco Largo Caballero; Fundación 1o de Mayo.
JIMERSON, Randall C. (2009). Archives Power. Memory, Accountability, and Social Justice. Chicago: Society of American Archivists.
MACNEILL, Heather, EASTWOOD, Terry (eds) (2017). Currents of Archival Thinking, 2nd Edition. Santa Barbara: Libraries Unlimited.
MAYER, Viktor; CUKIER, Kenneth (2013). Big data. La revolución de los datos masivos. Madrid: Turner Noema, 278p.
TÉRMENS, Miquel (2013). Preservación Digital. 1a ed. Barcelona: Editorial UOC. 109 p. (El professional de la información; 16)
Search in databases and specialised search engines on line.
Name | Group | Language | Semester | Turn |
---|---|---|---|---|
(PLAB) Practical laboratories | 71 | Catalan | first semester | afternoon |
(PLAB) Practical laboratories | 72 | Catalan | first semester | afternoon |
(TE) Theory | 7 | Catalan | first semester | afternoon |