Assessment

Continous Assessment Activities

Title	Weighting	Hours	ECTS	Learning Outcomes
Class Coevaluation Note	10%	0	0	3
Group Note	50%	5	0.2	1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Individual Note	30%	0	0	1, 2, 3, 4, 6
Peer Coevaluation Note	10%	0	0	3

Given that most of the work revolves around a set of projects that is developed throughout the course, the evaluation has a continuous nature, and does not provide for the single evaluation system.

 

Evaluation Methodology

At the end of each project, the students will make an oral presentation of the project and will deliver a report of the work carried out. Both will be evaluated by the teachers of the subject, whether or not they are tutors. Students will not take any written exams. 

For the evaluation, the following INSTRUMENTS and ACTIVITIES will be used:

• An evaluation made by the teachers from the presentation of the projects carried out by the group (quality of work, presentation, memory delivered). Group grade (0 to 10) From:

• PROJECT REPORT: Document explaining the development of the work done: project plan, meeting minutes, information sought, explanation of the application implemented with a small user manual and tests carried out. The document must contain the following sections: introduction describing the objectives of the project and the state of the art; methodology section explaining the implemented solution in a reasoned way; experiments and results explaining the experimental design, metrics used, tests carried out and analysis of the results; Conclusions including proposals for improvement based on the analysis of the results

  .

• PRESENTATION: Oral presentation in 5-7 slides on the project developed and results obtained.  At the end, the evaluators will ask questions that will be taken into account in the individual grade of each student

• APPLICATION:Program developed with structured and commented code so that the project can be replicated.

  .

• An individual evaluation based on the observations made by the tutors in the tutored sessions, where the attitude, initiative, participation, attendance and punctuality of the student in the group sessions will be taken into account. In the individual grade, it will be also taken into account that the student has participated in all parts of the oral presentation: introduction, methodology, results and conclusions. Individual Grade (0 to 10).

   

• Co-evaluation and self-evaluation surveys among group members at the end of each project. Peer Coevaluation Note (0 to 10).

• Oral presentations are made before the students and the groups will assess the work of their classmates as a ranking. The group that is in 1st position will receive 10 points, the 2nd 8 points and so on.  Class Coevaluation Note (0 to 10).

 

Grades

Each project will have a grade that will be calculated as follows: 

Project Grade = 0.5 * Group Grade + 0.3 * Individual Grade + 0.1 * Peer Coevaluation Grade + 0.1 * Class Coevaluation Grade

 

where

• The Group grade will evaluate the work presented both in the oral presentation and in the documentation delivered 
• The Individual grade will evaluate participation in class and response to questions on the day of the presentation
• The Co-Evaluation of colleagues will evaluate: the individual contribution to the team's work, the attitude in the team, the fulfillment of responsibilities and the management of conflicts.
• The Co-evaluation of the class will evaluate: the quality of the presentation, the communication quality, the presentation of the results, the response to the evaluators' questions and the technical quality of the work.

The final grade will come from the weighted average of the projects carried out. The weighting will be the same for all projects 

To pass the subject, all of the following requirements must be met:

• The final grade must be greater than or equal to 5
• have delivered all the projects.
• The grade for all projects must be greater than or equal to 4

 

To distinguish between 'failed' and 'no-show', a deadline is set for students to unsubscribe from the evaluation, in which case they will appear as 'no-show'. To unsubscribe, you must notify the teacher, in writing or by email, and obtain an acknowledgment of receipt.

Recovery:

In the event that any of the projects have a grade lower than 4, they may be resubmitted on the day set as a recovery exam in the schedules published by the coordination on the school website.

Honors matriculations:

Awarding an honor roll grade is the decision of the teaching staff responsible for the subject. UAB regulations indicate that MH may only be granted to students who have obtained a final grade equal to or greater than 9:00 and their number cannot exceed 5% of the total number of enrolled students.

In the event that the number of students with a grade greater than or equal to 9 is more than 5% of the total enrolled, the criteria to be applied in the order listed below will be the following:

1. Those with the highest Individual Grade are prioritized.
2. Those with the highest Company Co-Evaluation Score are prioritized.
3. Those with the highest Class Co-evaluation Note are prioritized.

Grade Review Procedure

Students will have the right to review the grades published in the indicated place and on the days indicated.

 

Irregularities on the part of the student, copying and plagiarism

Without prejudice to other disciplinary measures that are deemed appropriate, and in accordance with current academic regulations, irregularities committed by a student that may lead to a change in the grade will be graded with a zero (0). For example, plagiarize, copy, allow copying... an evaluation activity will involve failing this activity with a zero (0). Evaluation activities qualified in this way and for this reason will not be recoverable. If it is necessary to pass any of these evaluation activities to pass the subject, this subject will be suspended directly, without the opportunity to recover it in the same course.