Assessment

Continous Assessment Activities

Title	Weighting	Hours	ECTS	Learning Outcomes
Attendance and active participation in class	10%	0	0	CM06, CM11, KM13, KM15, SM01
Group case study work	40%	0	0	CM06, CM11, KM13, KM15, SM01
Presentations and written individual work documents	50%	4	0.16	CM06, CM11, KM13, KM15, SM01

Conitinuous assessment

 

The course’s final grade will essentially be based on the following three components:

• Written individual work documents that represent 50% of the final grade.

Maximum 4 writing exercises would be proposed along the course (a summary of reading articles, a short essay regarding an ongoing debate or an issue raised in class, a small intervention on a specific concept discussed in class, etc.). Written quality, ability to concretise and synthesize arguments and argumentation capacity will be valued.

• Group case study work that represents 40% of the final grade.

At the beginning of the course, a case study would be proposed for each group (groups of 3 students) and an outline of the contents that will be developed and worked throughout the whole period. The presentations in class of the different parts of the research paper and the partial deliveries will build the final grade. All group members must demonstrate equal work and commitment towards the teamwork. The quality and rigor of the contents will be valued as well as the quality of the presentation, the language used and the graphics.

• Attendance and active participation in class that represents 10% of the final grade.

Have participated regularly in the debates and activities proposed in the classes.

 

On carrying out each evaluation activity, lecturers will inform students (on Moodle) of the procedures to be followed for reviewing all grades awarded, and the date on which such a review will take place.

 

Single assessment

Single assessment means a single assessment date but not a single assessment activity. 

 Written individual work documents that represent 50% of the final grade. 

Case study work that represents 40% of the final grade.

Theroretical test (10%)

Qualification’s requirements:

a) Having passed written individual work documents with a minimum average grade of 5.

b) Have submitted the case study work with a minimum grade of 5.

Both previous grades will not average between them to pass the subject. Therefore, you must have a minimum grade of5 in both jobs (individual documents and case work in groups).

c) Have participated regularly in the classes.

 

Grade’s review:

a) The examsand works to review the final grade would be indicated in due time.

b) To qualify for review, you must have participated in the evaluation tests and delivered the materials of the practices in the manner that will be indicated in due time.

c) The maximum grade that can be obtained in the review process is 5.

 

Not eligible students:

In case a student does not submit at least one individual essay or the case study work.

Plagiarism

The copying or plagiarism of material, both in the case of works and in the case of exams, constitute a crime that will be sanctioned with a zero to the activity. In the case of recidivism, the entire subject will be suspended.
Let's remember that a "copy" is considered a work that reproduces all or most of the work of one or the other company / a. "Plagiarism" is the fact of presenting all or part of a text of an author as its own, without mentioning the sources, be on paper or in digital format. See UAB documentation on "plagiarism" at:
http://wuster.uab.es/web_argumenta_obert/unit_20/sot_2_01.html.

No specific programari is described beyond the objectives, content and methodology described.