Degree | Type | Year |
---|---|---|
2503702 Ancient Studies | OT | 4 |
You can view this information at the end of this document.
Basic knowledge of the main office software systems.
This course is the advanced continuation of the basic training subject "Digital instruments and tools for the study of antiquity".
The digital humanities have already become an essential requirement in the various professional fields in which a graduate in Ancient Sciences will work, whether they are related to dissemination from museums, archaeological sites, cultural centers and media communication, as like teaching at any educational level, archiving or research. In this subject, mainly practice-oriented, the students will have the opportunity to train in the use of a wide variety of tools to cover the different needs that they will face in their professional career, as well as to learn to critically assess existing resources.
Within this frame of reference, students will achieve the following objectives:
- Obtain an updated overview of the use and objectives of computer tools applied to the study of the sciences of antiquity.
- Use part of this tools in specific cases, related to the world of the Humanities.
1. History of Computer Science for the Sciences of Antiquity
2. Overview of digital resources available in the Sciences of Antiquity.
3. The texts
3.1 Advanced text and bibliography processing
3.2 Standard text file formats: txt, markdown and html
3.3 Text processing and analysis
4. The databases
4.1 Tables, elements and records. Relational databases.
4.2 Recent developments: non-relational databases, big data.
Database practices
5. Statistics
5.1 Numerical processing of information
5.2 Quantification and descriptive statistics
Practices with spreadsheet
6. Image
6.1 Graphic formats: vector, raster, point cloud, meshes
6.2 Methods of obtaining the image
Photogrammetry practice
7. Geography, territory and historical sciences
7.1 Geographic Information Systems applied to Historical Heritage: relating databases to cartographic information.
Practice with a GIS platform
8. Management and conservation.
8.1 Management of cultural information: portals, projects and institutional communities
8.2 Dissemination of cultural heritage: virtual and augmented reality, virtual museum spaces.
8.3 Use of mobile devices
9. Evaluation of digital applications.
9.1 Logins
9.2 Cybermetry
9.3 Accessibility and usability
10. Dissemination and teaching
10.1 Presentation of works, projects, research.
10.2 Publication on the Internet: types of applications, collaborative work, legal conditions.
10.3 Social networks.
10.3 Tools for teaching.
Title | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|
Type: Directed | |||
Practical sessions | 25 | 1 | 4, 3 |
Theory | 20 | 0.8 | 1, 2, 3 |
Type: Supervised | |||
Tutorship | 30 | 1.2 | |
Type: Autonomous | |||
Study of real cases and elaboration of work | 75 | 3 | 1, 4, 2, 3 |
The contents of the subject will be treated, first of all, from the theoretical point of view, providing the students with an updated knowledge base.
Secondly, an important part of the course is oriented towards the practical side, deepening and putting into practice the leading digital techniques applied to real case studies.
Annotation: Within the schedule set by the centre or degree programme, 15 minutes of one class will be reserved for students to evaluate their lecturers and their courses or modules through questionnaires.
Title | Weighting | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
Class attendance and participation | 20 | 0 | 0 | 1, 4, 2, 3 |
Indivudual exercises solving | 40 | 0 | 0 | 1, 2 |
Project and work presentation and digital publication | 40 | 0 | 0 | 4, 3 |
I. Assessment exercises and tests
The evaluation of the student will be done from:
Class attendance and participation (20%)
Resolution of practical exercises (40%)
Elaboration and digital publication of works and projects (40%)
II. Necessary requirements for the student to be evaluated
Not assessable.
Students who don’t attend to at least 20% of the assessments criteria above described, will be marked as “non-assessable”.
Assessable.
The assessable students will be evaluate on the “fail to excellent (Distinction)” scale, according to the percentages mentioned in the corresponding section.
III. Reassessment terms
To be able to present to the reassessment exam, the student:
• must have an average mark of at least 3.5
• must have previously been evaluated in a set of activities, the weight of which is equal to a minimum of 70% of the total qualification.
IV. Mark review procedure
The student has the right to review all the periodic exercises, the partial and final exams and the assignments, in class and / or in the tutorial hours.
The day for the revision of the provisional final mark and the revision of the reassessment test, will be announced in the minutes.
The student has the obligation to check the minutes of the marks before its validation, in order to ensure that there has been no error in the transfer of marks by the faculty.
Plagiarism.
In the event of a student committing any irregularity that may lead to a significant variation in the grade awarded to an assessment activity, the student will be given a zero for this activity, regardless of any disciplinary process that may take place. In the event of several irregularities in assessment activities of thesame subject, the student will be given a zero as the final grade for this subject.
This subject does not incorporate single assessment.
Despite the fact that a basic reference bibliography is provided below, the texts for this subject, of an eminently practical nature, are constantly updated to follow the continuous development of the different technologies.
For this reason, bibliography or other more specialized resources will be indicated for each topic throughout the course.
Barceló, Joan A., Pallarés, Maria (1998), Beyond GIS: The archaeology of social spaces. http://www.archcalc.cnr.it/indice/PDF9/09_05_Barcelo.pdf
Cortés Gabaudan, Francisco, González Marín, Susana (2020), Recursos en red para Filología Clásica < https://www.clasicasusal.es/portal_recursos > (Accessed: 28 June 2021).
Falloon, G. (2020), From digital literacy to digital competence: the teacher digital competency (TDC) framework. Education Tech Research Dev 68, 2449–2472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09767-4
Hemsley, James, Cappellini, Vito, Stanke, Gerd (2016) Digital Applications for Cultural and Heritage Institutions. London: Routledge. Available at: http://search.ebscohost.com.are.uab.cat/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsebk&AN=1480697&site=eds-live (Accessed: 28 June 2021).
Linder, Wilfried (2006), Digital photogrammetry: a practical course. New York: Springer.
Pierazzo, Elena (2015), Digital Scholarly Editing: Theories, Models and Methods, Farnham, Surrey: Ashgate.
Van den Akker, Chiel, and Susan Legêne, editors (2016), Museums in a Digital Culture. Amsterdam University Press. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1s475tm. Accessed 1 July 2021.
Van den Akker, Chiel, and Susan Legêne, editors (2016), Museums in a Digital Culture. Amsterdam University Press. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1s475tm. Accessed 1 July 2021.
Schreibman, Susan, Siemens, Ray, Unsworth, John (2004), A Companion to Digital Humanities, Malden - Oxford - Blackwell - Carlton, https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/book/10.1002/9780470999875 (accessed 29 June 2022).
Steinberg, Steven J., Steinberg, Sheila L. (2006), GIS : geographic information systems for the social sciences : investigating space and place. SAGE Publications.
Whitehorn, Mark, Marklyn, Bill (2001), Inside relational databases. London: Springer.
Although along the course students will use several types of software that will be illustrated throughout the course, they are not required to have previously installed software. Anyway, it would be convenient to have access to Word and PowerPoint.
Name | Group | Language | Semester | Turn |
---|---|---|---|---|
(PAUL) Classroom practices | 1 | Catalan | second semester | morning-mixed |
(TE) Theory | 1 | Catalan | second semester | morning-mixed |