Degree | Type | Year |
---|---|---|
2500249 Translation and Interpreting | OT | 4 |
You can view this information at the end of this document.
At the beginning of the course students should be able to:
Demonstrate knowledge of the basic methodological principles governing translation, professional
and instrumental aspects and the contrastive problems for this language combination.
Demonstrate they are familiar with literary trends in English.
Differentiate between literary genres and identify their specific features.
Apply strategies to further their literary knowledge to be able to translate.
Apply literary knowledge to be able to translate.
The aim of this course is to develop problem-solving skills when translating literary texts reflecting different genres. By the end of this course students should be able to:
Title | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|
Type: Directed | |||
Activities related with literary translation | 29 | 1.16 | 1, 3, 2, 13, 12, 11, 5, 20, 19, 21, 7, 10, 9, 8, 14, 15, 17, 4, 18, 16, 6, 22 |
Solving exercises | 10 | 0.4 | 1, 3, 2, 13, 12, 11, 5, 20, 19, 21, 7, 10, 9, 8, 14, 15, 17, 4, 18, 16, 6 |
Type: Supervised | |||
Debates and activities on relevant aspects of literary translation | 5 | 0.2 | 1, 3, 2, 13, 12, 11, 5, 20, 19, 21, 7, 10, 9, 8, 14, 15, 17, 4, 18, 16, 6, 22 |
Preparation of translations and assignements | 10 | 0.4 | 1, 3, 2, 13, 12, 11, 5, 20, 19, 21, 7, 10, 9, 8, 14, 15, 17, 4, 18, 16, 6, 22 |
Type: Autonomous | |||
Preparation of exercises | 8.1 | 0.32 | 1, 3, 2, 13, 12, 11, 5, 20, 19, 21, 7, 10, 9, 8, 14, 15, 17, 4, 18, 16, 6, 22 |
Preparation of translations and assignements | 50.4 | 2.02 | 1, 3, 2, 13, 12, 11, 5, 20, 19, 21, 7, 10, 9, 8, 14, 15, 17, 4, 18, 16, 6, 22 |
Research and documentation | 30 | 1.2 | 1, 3, 2, 13, 12, 11, 5, 20, 19, 21, 7, 10, 9, 8, 14, 15, 17, 4, 18, 16, 6, 22 |
An active methodology with activities of various types is used. The instruments of the Virtual Campus of the UAB or any other visual teaching and learning environment are used.
Possible methodologies:
The didactic activities are organized in three blocks, according to the degree of autonomy required by the student:
Annotation: Within the schedule set by the centre or degree programme, 15 minutes of one class will be reserved for students to evaluate their lecturers and their courses or modules through questionnaires.
Title | Weighting | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
Exercises and assignements related to relevant aspects of literary translation | 30 | 2.25 | 0.09 | 1, 3, 2, 13, 12, 11, 5, 20, 19, 21, 7, 10, 9, 8, 14, 15, 17, 4, 18, 16, 6, 22 |
Literary translation activities | 30 | 2.25 | 0.09 | 1, 3, 2, 13, 12, 11, 5, 20, 19, 21, 7, 10, 9, 8, 14, 15, 17, 4, 18, 16, 6 |
Reflection on the specificity of literary translation | 40 | 3 | 0.12 | 1, 3, 2, 13, 12, 11, 5, 20, 19, 21, 7, 10, 9, 8, 14, 15, 17, 4, 18, 16, 6, 22 |
Continuous evaluation is used.
Possible evaluation activities:
The maximum value of each of the evaluable activities will be 40% of the total of the final mark. Therefore, there will be a minimum of 3 evaluable activities. The information about the evaluation, the type of evaluation activity and its weight on the subject is for information purposes only. The teacher in charge of the subject will specify it at the beginning of the teaching.
Review
When publishing final grades prior to recording them on students' transcripts, the lecturer will provide written notification of a date and time for reviewing assessment activities. Students must arrange reviews in agreement with the lecturer.
Missed/failed assessment activities
Students may retake assessment activities they have failed or compensate for any they have missed, provided that those they have actually performed account for a minimum of 66.6% (two-thirds) of the final grade for the subject and that they have a weighted average grade of at least 3.5.
The lecturer will inform students, in writing, of the procedure involved when publishing final grades prior to recording them on transcripts. The lecturer may set one assignment per failed or missed assessment activity or a single assignment to cover a number of such activities. Under no circumstances may an assessment activity worth 100% of the final grade be retaken or compensated for. In the case of retakes, the maximum grade will be 5 (Pass).
Classification as "not assessable"
In the event that the assessment activities a student has performed account for 25% or less of the subject's final grade for the subject, their work will be classified as "not assessable" on their transcript.
Misconduct in assessment activities
This subject may be assessed under the single assessment system in accordance with the terms established in the academic regulations of the UAB and the assessment criteria of the Faculty of Translation and Interpreting.
Students must make an online request within the period established by the faculty and send a copy to the lecturer responsible for the subject, for the record.
Students who engage in misconduct (plagiarism, copying, personation, etc.) in an assessment activity will receive a grade of “0” for the activity in question. In the case of misconduct in more than one assessment activity, the student involved will be given a final grade of “0” for the subject. Assessment activities in which irregularities have occurred (e.g. plagiarism, copying, impersonation) are excluded from retake activities.
Single assessment
This subject may be assessed under the single assessment system in accordance with the terms established in the academic regulations of the UAB and the assessment criteria of the Faculty of Translation and Interpreting.
Students must make an online request within the period established by the faculty and send a copy to the lecturer responsible for the subject, for the record.
Single assessment will be carried out in person on one day during week 16 or 17 of the semester. The Academic Management Office will publish the exact date and time on the faculty website.
On the day of the single assessment, teaching staff will ask the student for identification, which should be presented as a valid identification document with a recent photograph (student card, DNI/NIE or passport).
Single assessment activities
Single assessment will include a minimum of three assessment activities of different types, as stated in the assessment guidelines.
Grade revision and retake procedures for the subject are the same as those for continual assessment. See the section above in this Study Guide.
1. Monolingual dictionaries in Spanish
Casares, Julio, Diccionario ideológico de la lengua española, Barcelona, Gustavo Gili, 1999.
Diccionario general de la lengua española (DGLE), Barcelona, Biblograf, 1999, 1ª reimpr.
Moliner, María, Diccionario de uso del español, 2 vols., Madrid, Gredos 2007, 3ª ed.
Real Academia Española, Diccionario de la lengua española, Madrid, Espasa-Calpe, 1992, 21ª ed.
Seco, Manuel, Olimpia Andrés y Gabino Ramos, Diccionario del español actual, 2 vols., Madrid, Aguilar, 1999.
2. Monolingual dictionaries in English
New Oxford English Dictionary, 20 vols., Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1989.
The New Shorter Oxford Dictionary, 2 vols., Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1994, 4ª reimpr.
Webster's Third New International Dictionary, Springfield (Mass.), Merriam-Webster, 1993.
3. Bilingual dictionaries in Spanish
Collins universal español-inglés/English-Spanish Dictionary, Barcelona, Grijalbo, 2009, 8ª ed.
Diccionario Oxford español-inglés inglés-español, Madrid, Oxford University Press, 2008, 4ª ed..
Diccionario internacional Simon&Schuster inglés-español español-inglés, Nueva York, MacMillan, 1997, 2ªed.
Gran diccionario Larousse español-inglés English-Spanish, Barcelona, Larousse, 2008, 2ª ed.
4. Reference works in English
Alexander, L. G., Longman English Grammar, Londres, Longman, 1988.
Collins Cobuild English Grammar, Londres, HarperCollins, 2006, 2ª ed. rev.
Michael Swan, Practical English Usage, Oxford/Nueva York, Oxford University Press, 2005, 3ª ed.
Quirk, Randolph, y Greenbaum, Sidney, A University Grammar of English, Harlow (Essex), Longman, 1993, 28ª reimpr.
Thompson, A. J., y A. V. Martinet, A Practical English Grammar, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1996, 4ª ed.
5. Reference works in Spanish
Agencia Efe, Manual del español urgente, Madrid, Cátedra, 2006, 18ª ed. corr. y aum.
Alarcos Llorach, Emilio, Gramática de la lengua española, Madrid, Espasa Calpe, 1994.
Bosque, Ignacio (director), Redes. Diccionario combinatorio del español contemporáneo, Madrid, SM, 2004.
Corripio, Fernando, Diccionario de ideas afines, Barcelona, Herder, 2000, 7ª ed.
Fundéu-BBVA, Vademécum: Diccionario de dudas del español, disponible en edición digital.
García Yebra, Valentín, Claudicación en el uso de las preposiciones, Madrid, Gredos, 1988.
Gili Gaya, Samuel, Curso superior de sintaxis española, Barcelona, Vox, 1993, 15ª ed.
Lázaro Carreter, Fernando, El dardo en la palabra, Barcelona, Círculo de lectores, 1997.
—, El nuevo dardo en la palabra, Madrid, Aguilar, 2003.
Lorenzo, Emilio, El español de hoy, lengua en ebullición, Madrid, Gredos, 1994, 4ª ed.
—, Anglicismos hispánicos, Madrid, Gredos, 1996.
—, El español en la encrucijada, Madrid, Espasa Calpe, 1999.
Martínez de Sousa, José, Diccionariode usos y dudas del español actual (DUDEA), Gijón, Trea, 2008, 4ª ed.
—, Manual de estilo de la lengua española 4 (MELE 4), Gijón, Trea, 2012, 4ª ed. rev. y amp.
—, Ortografía y ortotipografía del español actual, Gijón, Trea, 2004.
—, Diccionario de uso de las mayúsculas y minúsculas, Gijón, Trea, 2007.
Marsá, Francisco, Diccionario normativo y guía práctica de la lengua española, Barcelona, Ariel, 1994.
País, El, Libro de estilo, Madrid, Aguilar, 2002.
Real Academia Española, Nueva gramática de la lengua española, Madrid, Espasa Calpe, 2009.
Real Academia Española, Ortografía de la lengua española, Madrid, Espasa Calpe, 1999.
Redes, Diccionario combinatorio del español combinatorio, Madrid, SM, 2004.
Seco, Manuel, Diccionario de dudas y dificultades de la lengua española, Madrid, Espasa-Calpe, 2000, 10ª ed. 2ª reimpr.
Torrents dels Prats, A., Diccionario de dificultades del inglés, Barcelona, Juventud, 1989.
6. Corpora
CREA, Corpus de referencia del español actual. Existe versión en línea.
CORDE, Corpus diacrónico del español. Existe versión en línea.
7. Translation textbooks
García Yebra, Valentín, Teoría y práctica de la traducción,Madrid, Gredos, 1982.
López Guix, Juan Gabriel, y Jacqueline Minett Wilkinson, Manual de traducción inglés/castellano, Barcelona, Gedisa, 2006, 5ª ed.
Newmark, Peter, A Textbook of Translation, Londres/Nueva York, Prentice Hall International Ltd, 1987. (Existe versión castellana: Manual de traducción, trad. Virgilio Moya, Madrid, Cátedra, 1992.)
Stockwell, R. P., J. D. Bowen y J. W. Martin, The Grammatical Structures of English and Spanish, Chicago-Londres, University of Chicago Press, 1965.
Wandruska, Mario, Nuestros idiomas comparables e incomparables, trad. Elena Bombín, Madrid, Gredos, 1976.
8. On translation
Ayala, Francisco, «Breve teoría de la traducción» (1946), en La estructura narrativa, Barcelona, Crítica, 1984.
Bellos, David, Is That a Fish in your Ear?, Londres, Faber & Faber, 2011.
Borges, Jorge Luis, «Las versiones homéricas» (1932), en Obras completas, Barcelona, Emecé, 1989.
—, «Los traductores de las 1001 noches» (1936), ibíd.
—, «Piere Menard, autor de El Quijote» (1939), ibíd.
—, «La busca de Averroes» (1947), ibíd.
Catelli, Nora, y Marietta Gargatagli, El tabaco que fumaba Plinio, Barcelona, Serbal, 1998.
Coseriu, Eugenio, «Lo erróneo y lo acertado en la teoría de la traducción», en El hombre y su lenguaje, Madrid, Gredos, 1977.
Eco, Umberto, Decir casi lo mismo, trad. Helena Lozano, Barcelona, Lumen, 2008.
Fernández González, Vicente (comp.), La traducción de la A a la Z, Córdoba, Berenice, 2008.
García Yebra, Valentín, En torno a la traducción. Teoría, crítica, historia, Madrid, Gredos, 1983.
—, Traducción: teoría y práctica, Madrid, Gredos, 1994.
Gentzler, Edwin, Contemporary Translation Theories, Londres/Nueva York, Routledge, 1993.
Grossman, Edith, Why Translation Matters, New Haven, Yale University Press, 2010.
Larbaud, Valéry, Sous l’invocation de Saint Jérome, París, Gallimard, 1946.
López Guix, Juan Gabriel, «Literalidad y libertad: un camino para la traducción literaria», en Carlos Fortea (coord.), El viaje de la literatura, Madrid, Cátedra, 2018.
– , «La conversación del traductor», en Dora Sales (ed.), Documenación aplicada a la traducción y a la interpretación, Gijón, Trea, 2023.
Marías, Javier, «Ausencia y memoria en la traducción poética» (1980), en Literatura y fantasma, Madrid, Siruela, 1993.
—, «La traducción como fingimiento y representación» (1982), ibíd.
Monterroso, Augusto, «Llorar a orillas del río Mapocho» (1983), en La palabra mágica, Barcelona, Anagrama, 1996.
Ortega y Gasset, José, «Miseria y esplendor de la traducción» (1937), en Obras completas, vol. V, Madrid, Alianza, 1983.
Palomero, Mari Pepa (compiladora), Antología de El trujamán, Madrid, Instituto Cervantes, 2002. Consultable, junto con otros múltiples textos, en el sitio del Centro Virtual Cervantes.
Paz, Octavio, Traducción: literatura y literalidad, Barcelona, Tusquets, 1971, 1990.
Ruiz Casanova, José Francisco, Ensayo de una historia de la traducción en España, Madrid, Cátedra, 2018.
No specific software will be used.
Name | Group | Language | Semester | Turn |
---|---|---|---|---|
(PAUL) Classroom practices | 1 | Spanish | second semester | morning-mixed |