Degree | Type | Year | Semester |
---|---|---|---|
2501933 Journalism | FB | 2 | 1 |
You can check it through this link. To consult the language you will need to enter the CODE of the subject. Please note that this information is provisional until 30 November 2023.
No specific knowledge is required.
This module belongs to Communication subject or area and it is qualified as fundamental within the Journalism Bachelor Degree. It is considered that there is a progressive logic linking the basic modules of the Communication subject or area;, based on a long teaching experience and structured as follows:
The general training objectives of this module are: 1) to identify the main theories in the communication field, the conceptual elaboration and the theoretical approaches that lay the foundations of its knowledge; I 2) to favour critical thinking about the role of the media within society.
SYLLABUS:
Introduction and year planning. Presenting the program.
Interpersonal communication.
Non-verbal interpersonal communication.
Media communication. Beginning of the communication media research.
Media communication. Functionalist paradigm.
Media communication. Agenda setting theory.
Media communication. Silent spiral theory.
Media communication. Social construction of reality.
Media communication. Birmingham school.
Media communication. Media events.
Media communication. Journalistic process of scandals.
Media communication. Post-truth.
The calendar will be available on the first day of class. Students will find all information on the Virtual Campus: the description of the seminar activities, teaching materials, and any necessary information for the proper follow-up of the subject. In case of a change of teaching modality for health reasons, teachers will make readjustments in the schedule and methodologies.
This teaching guide includes a gender perspective when addressing the module’s content.
The learning will be based on theory lectures, leraning throug discussion and debates, readings, tutorials, projects and tests. The main goal of this module is to lay the foundation and develop a critical analysis and critical thinking.
Annotation: Within the schedule set by the centre or degree programme, 15 minutes of one class will be reserved for students to evaluate their lecturers and their courses or modules through questionnaires.
Title | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|
Type: Directed | |||
Lectures | 32 | 1.28 | 4, 1, 22, 2, 7, 5, 8, 9, 13, 12, 16, 15, 14, 17, 18, 11, 27 |
Seminars | 14 | 0.56 | 4, 1, 22, 2, 6, 5, 9, 20, 15, 14, 17, 21, 25, 24, 23, 18, 11, 27 |
Type: Supervised | |||
Tutoring | 19 | 0.76 | |
Type: Autonomous | |||
Personal study and oriented readings | 65 | 2.6 | 4, 1, 22, 6, 7, 5, 8, 20, 13, 12, 16, 15, 14, 17, 21, 26, 18, 11, 27 |
FIRST ENROLMENT STUDENTS
Continuous evaluation
Continuous evaluation consist of the following evaluation activities and percentages:
1. Two partial examinations (test format) related to theoretical content of the subject, and representing 25% of the final grade each. Every partial examination deals with different parts of the content.
To pass the course it is necessary to pass these two exams (Minimum: 5/10 each)). If one of the two partial exams is not taken the final grade will be "not assessable".
2. Essay, 30%. At the beginning of the course, seminar lecturers will provide guidelines about the project and its evaluations, as well as about calendar and deadlines. Seminar lecturers are also responsible for follow up and tutorial of student’s projects.
In case that the student doesn’t deliver it or doesn't do it at all, the mark will be “not evaluable”. Taking into account that the module has a continuous evaluation system, if a student is “not evaluable” on the project, he/she will also be “not evaluable” on the module’s final grade.
3. Seminar: Oral exposition, 10%. Required readings will be presented and discussed at seminars. These readings are planned to promote student learning and the application of communication theories to the analysis of reality and current events. The compulsory readings will be, together with the content of the theoretical classes, one of the main axes of the partial exams.
4. Seminar attendance, 10%.
Recuperation
In the event of failing one or both of partial exams, students are entitled to the revaluation: there is no minimum grade, but partial examination (or examinations) has/have to be taken. In the event that the second chance of one of thetwo exams isn’t passed, the final grade of the subject will be the one obtained in this exam (or the average, if both are failed).
There is no second chance for activities 2, 3 and 4.
Single evaluation
Single evaluation consist of the following evaluation activities and percentages:
Recuperation
In the event of failing the knowledge control, students are entitled to second chance: there is no minimum grade, but the examination has to be taken.
There is no second chance for activities 2, 3 and 4.
SECOND ENROLMENT STUDENTS
In case of second (or third...) enrolment, students can choose between continuous examination (see above) and a single synthesis exam or final examination (test format) with second-chance option (no minimum grade, it is compulsory to have taken the examination in the first chance). The grading of the subject will correspond to the grade of the synthesis or final examination. In the event of failing the second chance examination, the final grade of the subject will be the one obtained in this (second chance) examination.
It will be understood that students from second registration who do not communicate explicitly by e-mail and within the deadline announced at the beginning of the course their evaluationoption will take the synthesis test.
CALENDAR
Evaluation and reevaluation dates will be announced on the day of the presentation of the subject. Information will also be uploaded to Virtual Campus.
Plagiarism
In the event that the student performs any irregularity that may lead to a significant variation of an evaluation act, this evaluation act will be graded with 0, regardless of the disciplinary process that could be instructed. In the event, that several irregularities occur in the evaluation acts of the same subject, the final grade for this subject will be 0.
REVIEW OF QUALIFICATIONS
Ordinary revision of the evaluated activities:
Given the case the student is not satisfied with the grades of his or her different evaluated activities, there will be an option for revising these marks. In the case of the tests and final exam (test type), the ordinary revision will be carried by the lecturers responsible of theory groups. The individual project and seminar participation will be revised with seminar lecturers. Dates and time of ordinary revisions will be made public through UAB’s Virtual Campus.
Extraordinary revision of the module’s final grade:
In case of not agreeing with the final qualification of the module, students will have the right to ask for an extraordinary revision. He or she will have to fill a reasoned request to the Communication Sciences Faculty office within the fifteen days following the publication of the final mark. The revision will be carried out following the extraordinary revision instructions approved by the Faculty Board on 5th May of 2016, and revised in May 2019, and in March 2023, available at:
Title | Weighting | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
Essay | 30% | 5 | 0.2 | 4, 1, 22, 2, 6, 7, 5, 8, 9, 10, 20, 13, 12, 15, 14, 17, 21, 25, 24, 23, 18, 19, 11, 27 |
Oral presentation | 10% | 3 | 0.12 | 12, 17, 24, 23 |
Seminar attendance | 10% | 2 | 0.08 | 4, 1, 2, 6, 5, 13, 12, 16, 15, 14, 17, 21, 26, 25, 24, 23, 18, 11, 27 |
Test 1 | 25% | 5 | 0.2 | 4, 1, 3, 6, 8, 10, 13, 12, 16, 15, 17, 26, 25, 23, 18, 19, 27 |
Test 2 | 25% | 5 | 0.2 | 4, 1, 3, 6, 8, 10, 13, 12, 16, 15, 17, 26, 25, 23, 18, 19, 27 |
Altheide, David. 2014. Media Edge. Media Logic and Social Reality. Nueva York: Peter Lang.
Altheide, David. 2016. Media syndrome. Nueva York: Routledge. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/uab/detail.action?docID=4523459
Andrejevic, Mark.2009. Critical Media Studies 2.0: an interactive upgrade. Interaccions: Studies in Communication and Culture, 1 (1): 35-51. http://stout.hampshire.edu/~jvb07/pdfs/00andrejevic.pdf
Austin, John L. 1971. Palabras y acciones: Cómo hacer cosas con palabras. Barcelona: Paidós. [Ed. original: 1962]
Berry, David M. 2014. Critical theory and the digital. Nova York: Bloomsbury Academic.
Boynton, GR; Glen W. Richardson Jr. 2016. Agenda setting in the twenty-first century. New Media & Society, 18(9): 1916-1934. http://journals.sagepub.com.are.uab.cat/doi/full/10.1177/1461444815616226
Curran, James, Michael Gurevitch & Janet Wollacot, eds. 1981. Sociedad y comunicación de masas. Mèxic: Fondo de Cultura Económica. [Ed. original: 1947]
Curran, James, David Morley & Valerie Walkerdine, comps. 1998. Estudios culturales y comunicación. Análisis, producción y consumo cultural de las políticas de identidad y el posmodernismo.Barcelona: Paidós. [Ed. original: 1996]
Goffman, Erving. 2009. Presentación de la persona en la vida cotidiana. Buenos Aires: Editorial Amorrortu. [Ed. original: 1959]
Harson, Jayson 2018. A Critical Guide to Fake News: From Comedy to Tragedy, Pouvoirs, 164, 99-119. https://www.cairn-int.info/article-E_POUV_164_0099--a-critical-guide-to-fake-newsfrom.htm#
Jay, Martin. 1974. La imaginación dialéctica. Historia de la Escuela de Frankfurt y el Instituto de Investigación Social (1923-1950). Madrid: Taurus. [Ed. original: 1973]
Knapp, Mark L., Judith A. Hall & Terrence G. Hogan. 2014. Nonverbal Communication in Human Interaction. Wadsworth: Cengage Learning.
Lippman, Walter. 2003. La opinión pública. Madrid: Langre. [Ed. original: 1922]
McCombs, Maxwell. 2006. Estableciendo la agenda. El impacto de los medios en la opinión pública y en el conocimiento. Barcelona: Paidós. [Ed. original: 2004]
McStay, Andrew 2017. Privacy and the media. ProQuest Ebook Central https://ebookcentral.proquest.com
Moragas, Miquel. 2011. Interpretar la comunicación. Barcelona: Gedisa.
Morley, David. 1996. Televisión,audiencias y estudios culturales. Buenos Aires: Amorrortu. [Ed. original: 1992]
Muñoz López, Blanca. 2007. De las industrias culturales a los circuitos culturales. La metamorfosis de un proceso ideológico. Sociedad y Utopía. Revista de Ciencias Sociales, 29: 19-36. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=2276199
Musarò, Pierluigi. 2017. Mare Nostrum: the visual politics of amilitary-humanitarian operation in the Mediterranean Sea. Media, Culture & Society, 39 (1): 11-28. http://journals.sagepub.com.are.uab.cat/doi/full/10.1177/0163443716672296
Noelle-Neumann, Elisabeth. 1995. La espiral del silencio. Opinión pública: nuestra piel social. Barcelona: Paidós. [Ed. original: 1984]
Noelle-Neumann, Elisabeth. 1993. La espiral del silencio. La opinión pública y los efectos de los medios de comunicación. Comunicación y Sociedad, Vol. VI (1-2): 9-28. http://www.unav.es/fcom/comunicacionysociedad/es/resumen.php?art_id=226
Nothias, Toussaint. 2018. How Western Journalists Actually Write About Africa. Reassessing the myth of Representations of Africa. Journalism Studies,19 (8):1138-1159. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/1461670X.2016.1262748
Rosenberry, Jack i Lauren A. Vicker. 2017. Applied Mass Communication Theory: A Guide for Media Practitioners. ProQuest Ebook Central, https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.are.uab.cat/lib/UAB/reader.action?docID=4862639 (Consulta: 15-06-2018).
Rui, Jian Raymond; Michael A. Stefanone. 2016. The Desire for Fame: An Extension of Uses and Gratifications Theory. Communication Studies, 67 (4): 399-418. https://www-tandfonline-com.are.uab.cat/doi/full/10.1080/10510974.2016.1156006
Thompson, John B. 2005. The New Visibility. Theory, Culture & Society, 22 (6): 31-51. http://journals.sagepub.com.are.uab.cat/doi/pdf/10.1177/0263276405059413
Walsh, Mihael J.; Stephanie A. Baker. 2017. The Selfie and the transformation of the public-private distinction. Information, Communication & Society, 20 (8):1185-1203. http://www.tandfonline.com.are.uab.cat/doi/full/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1220969
Watzlawick, Paul, Janet H. Beavin & Don D. Jackson. 1985. Teoría de la comunicación humana: interacciones, patologías y paradojas. Barcelona: Herder. [Ed. original: 1967]
Wenner, Lawrence & Andrew C. Billings, eds. 2017. Sport, Media and Mega-Events, ed. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. ProQuest Ebook Central. https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.are.uab.cat/lib/UAB/detail.action?docID=4831596
Office pack