Degree | Type | Year | Semester |
---|---|---|---|
2500261 Education Studies | OB | 3 | 2 |
You can check it through this link. To consult the language you will need to enter the CODE of the subject. Please note that this information is provisional until 30 November 2023.
It is recommended having passed the subjects of the degree:
This subject is one of the subjects contributing to set the basis for the minor in "Training Management and socio-educational institutions"
The general objective is: To provide knowledge and resources for professional action in the field of design, development and implementation of innovative educational practices.
In this sense, the specific training objectives proposed are:
1. Educational innovation: perspectives and models
2. Educational innovation processes in organizations
3. Facilitators and resistances in the innovation processes
4. Strategies for innovation development. Evidence-informed innovations
5. Stakeholders for educational innovation: roles, functions and competences
Teaching methodology and training activities
The methodological approach of the subject starts from focusing the activity of the process on the student's learning. In order to allow the achievement of this principle, the student must be active and autonomous throughout the process, it being the teacher's mission to help him in this task. In this sense, the teachers,
1) will support students at all times by providing the information and resources necessary for learning to take place,
2) will ensure the autonomous learning of students by proposing different teaching and learning activities (individual and group, theoretical and practical) under the principle of methodological multivariate.
Under this approach, the subject is structured, in its design and development, into 3 types of teaching and learning activities that we detail and specify below:
In all the activities proposed in the subject, the gender perspective will be taken into account and attention to all students will be prioritized.
1.1 Face-to-face teaching-learning activities
Face-to-face teaching-learning activities may be:
1.2 Directed-supervised teaching-learning activities
Directed teaching-learning activities are those that are carried out outside the classroom under the direction of the teacher due to the tasks that can be assigned for the development of the subject. In this case we refer to:
1.3 Independent teaching-learning activities
The independent teaching-learning activities are carried out outside the classroom with the intention of being a complement to the learning that can be achieved thanks to face-to-face and directed activities. In this sense, we can consider that these activities are transversal and that fundamentally affect the students, without underestimating the advice and tutoring that the teacher can offer in their development. The following can be independent teaching-learning activities:
Annotation: Within the schedule set by the centre or degree programme, 15 minutes of one class will be reserved for students to evaluate their lecturers and their courses or modules through questionnaires.
Title | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|
Type: Directed | |||
Lecturer class | 30 | 1.2 | 6, 1, 3, 2, 4, 8, 7, 9, 10, 18, 11, 12, 13, 14, 5, 17 |
Seminars | 15 | 0.6 | 6, 1, 3, 2, 4, 8, 7, 9, 10, 18, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 5, 17 |
Type: Supervised | |||
Analysis of scientific readings | 12 | 0.48 | 6, 1, 4, 7, 9, 10, 13, 5, 17 |
Project in small groups | 25 | 1 | 6, 1, 3, 2, 4, 8, 7, 9, 10, 18, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 5, 17 |
Type: Autonomous | |||
Individual Autonomous work | 60 | 2.4 | 6, 1, 3, 2, 4, 7, 9, 10, 18, 11, 12, 13, 14, 5, 17 |
We consider that there are three key moments in the evaluation of the subject: initial evaluation, continuous evaluation and final evaluation.
With these basic principles, we have that the student must deliver two types of basic evidence: 1 practical work of a group nature (2 Moodle platform deliveries: April 8, 2024 and June 10, 2024) and 1 theoretical-practical activities with evaluative implications (Final exam- June 17, 2024, Recovery July 1, 8-10:30 a.m.).
The Practical work has a formative purpose from the point of view of their evaluation, since they can be reviewed by the group depending on the task given. This review will be done in the seminars that are considered presenting the results of the group work to the rest of the classmates.
The theoretical-practical activities with evaluative implications, separated in each of the blocks of content considered, have a summative purpose and must be an individual synthesis of the realization, discussion and reflection of group work. Due to its nature, when an activity is suspended it can be recovered at the end of the subject on a specific date
Carrying out all the theoretical-practical activities with evaluative implications and the practical work is essential to pass the subject. In the event that there are some pending assignments, they can be completed and/or handed in on the specific date at the end of the subject.
Each individual situation that does not conform to what is written must be communicated to the teacher of the subject in order to enable the relevant evaluations without losing sight of the evaluation philosophy considered.
The feedback of any activity with evaluative implications will be given within a week.
To pass the subject, all assessment activities must be passed. These can be recovered, if they have been suspended, in 15 days after the date on which the note was received.
To pass the subject, it is recommended to show an attitude compatible with the educational profession. students are expected to demonstrate behavior that facilitates an active group climate that is conducive to learning.
In some of the assessment activities, peer assessment and self-assessment activities will be implemented, with implications for the grade. In group activities, the marks of the members of the group can be different, depending on the self-assessment and peer assessment of the individual contribution in the group task.
-------------------------------------------------- ------------------
SINGLE EVALUATION
If a student accepts the Single Evaluation modality, he/she will have to present a PORTFOLIO with all the evidence established as evaluation activities.
The delivery will be made via the Moodle platform on the date provided in the schedule for the delivery of the Final Work of the Module. Later, you will be called for an interview where the content of the portfolio will be analyzed.
Reminder:
Final exam: June 17 (from 8 a.m. to 10:30 a.m.)
Recovery: July 1 (from 8 a.m. to 10:30 a.m.)
The same recovery system will be applied as for the continuous assessment.
The interview presentation and analysis of the PORTFOLIO will be held individually, on June 17, starting at 10:30 a.m., withan oral presentation of the research project. This evaluative activity will be recorded videographically.
--------------------------------------------------
Copying or plagiarism in any type of assessment activity constitutes a crime, and will be penalized with a 0 as a grade for the subject losing the possibility of recovering it, whether it is an individual or group work (in this case, all members of the group will have a 0). If, during the completion of an individual work in class, the teacher considers that a student is trying to copy or discovers some type of document or device not authorized by the teaching staff, the same will be graded with a 0, without recovery option, and therefore, the subject will be suspended. A work, activity or exam will be considered to be "copied" when it reproduces all or a significant part of the work of another colleague. A work or activity will be considered "plagiarized" when a part of an author's text is presented as one's own without citing the sources, regardless of whether the original sources are on paper or in digital format.
Title | Weighting | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
OTHERS: Reviews | 5% | 0 | 0 | 6, 1, 2, 4, 7, 9, 10, 18, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 5, 17 |
OTHERS: involvement / participation, self and peer evaluation | 5% | 0 | 0 | 6, 1, 3, 2, 4, 8, 7, 9, 10, 18, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 5, 17 |
PRACTICE: Educational Innovation Project (teamwork) | 30% | 0 | 0 | 6, 1, 3, 2, 4, 8, 7, 9, 10, 18, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 5, 17 |
PRACTICE: Oral presentation of the innovative project | 10% | 5 | 0.2 | 6, 1, 3, 2, 4, 8, 7, 9, 10, 18, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 5, 17 |
THEORY: Development Written Exam (individual exam) | 50% | 3 | 0.12 | 6, 1, 3, 2, 4, 7, 9, 10, 18, 11, 12, 13, 5, 17 |
Carballo, R. (2009). Manifiestos para la innovación educativa. Proyecto innovador a partir de experiències de alumnos universitarios. Ediciones Diaz de Santos.
Cai, Y. (2017). From an analytical framework for understanding the innovation process in higher education to an emerging research field of innovations in higher education. Review of Higher Education, 40(4), 585-616.
Fullan, M. (2002). Los nuevos significados del cambio en educación. Octaedro.
Escudero, J.M. (2014). Avances y retos en la promoción de la innovación en los centros educativos. Educar, 35, 101-138.
Gilbert, A., Tait-McCutcheon, S. & Knewstubb, B. (2021) Innovative teaching in higher education: Teachers' perceptions of support and constraint, Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 58(2), 123-134, https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2020.1715816.
Guarro, A. (2005). Los procesos de cambio educativo en una sociedad compleja: diseño, desarrollo e innovación del currículum. Pirámide.
Hannan, A. y Silver, H. (2005). La innovación en la Enseñanza superior. Narcea.
IFIIE-MEC (2011). Estudio sobre la innovación educativa en España. Secretaria General Técnicas-MEC.
Herranz, A. y Paredes, J. (2012). Promover el cambio pedagógico en la universidad. Pirámide.
Iranzo, P. (2012). El asesoramiento pedagógico al profesorado. Síntesis
Orrego, V. (2022). Innovación educativa: Propuesta conceptual, paradigmática y dimensiones de acción. Revista Ensayos Pedagógicos, XVII(2), 95-116.
Rivas, A. (2017). Cambio e innovación educativa. Las cuestiones cruciales. Fundación Santillana
Stéphan, V. L., Joaquin, U., Soumyajit, K., & Gwénaël, J. (2019). Educational Research and Innovation Measuring Innovation in Education 2019 What Has Changed in the Classroom?:What Has Changed in the Classroom?. OECD Publishing
Taula rodona (2017). La innovació en educació, una perspectiva des de l’experiència. Taula rodona. Revista Catalana de Pedagogia, 12, 107-124.
Tejada, J. (1998). Los agentes de innovación en los centros educatives. Aljibe.
Tejada, J. (2005). Didáctica-Currículum: Diseño, desarrollo y evaluación curricular. Davinci Continental
Tejada, J. (2007). La innovación formativa. En: Tejada, J. y Giménez, V. (Coord). Formación de Formadores. Escenario institucional. (pp. 631-712). THOMSON.
Torre, S. Barrios, O. (Coords.). (2002) Estrategias didácticas innovadoras. Recursos para la formación y el cambio. Octaedro.
Villa, A. (2008). Innovación y cambio en las organizaciones educativas. Universidad de Deusto.
This subject does not require software.