Logo UAB
2023/2024

Environmental Evaluation of Plans, Programmes and Projects

Code: 102827 ECTS Credits: 9
Degree Type Year Semester
2501915 Environmental Sciences OB 3 2

Contact

Name:
Marcela Arqueros Wood
Email:
marcela.arqueros@uab.cat

Teaching groups languages

You can check it through this link. To consult the language you will need to enter the CODE of the subject. Please note that this information is provisional until 30 November 2023.

Teachers

Enrique Doblas Miranda
Eduard Madaula Izquierdo
Marcela Arqueros Wood

Prerequisites

- It is recommended to have taken the course "Environmental and Natural Resources Economics".


Objectives and Contextualisation

- To know the environmental assessment procedures and the content of the mandatory documents.

- To know the legislation governing environmental assessments.

- To know how to identify and assess environmental impacts.

- To be able to propose mitigating measures of impacts.

- To recognize the main effects of human activities on the natural and social environment.

- To know how to value the social perception of environmental impacts.

- To critically analyze an environmental assessment.


Competences

  • Adequately convey information verbally, written and graphic, including the use of new communication and information technologies.
  • Analyze and use information critically.
  • Collect, analyze and represent data and observations, both qualitative and quantitative, using secure adequate classroom, field and laboratory techniques
  • Demonstrate adequate knowledge and use the most relevant environmental tools and concepts of biology, geology, chemistry, physics and chemical engineering.
  • Demonstrate adequate knowledge and use the tools and concepts of mathematics, computer science and statistics to analyze and manage environmental issues.
  • Demonstrate adequate knowledge and use the tools and concepts of the most relevant social science environment.
  • Demonstrate concern for quality and praxis.
  • Demonstrate initiative and adapt to new situations and problems.
  • Information from texts written in foreign languages.
  • Integrate environmental information in order to formulate and test hypotheses.
  • Integrate physical, technological and social aspects that characterize environmental problems.
  • Learn and apply in practice the knowledge acquired and to solve problems.
  • Quickly apply the knowledge and skills in the various fields involved in environmental issues, providing innovative proposals.
  • Teaming developing personal values regarding social skills and teamwork.
  • Work autonomously

Learning Outcomes

  1. Adequately convey information verbally, written and graphic, including the use of new communication and information technologies.
  2. Analyze and use information critically.
  3. Demonstrate concern for quality and praxis.
  4. Demonstrate initiative and adapt to new situations and problems.
  5. Demonstrate knowledge of some of the main areas of scientific disciplines environment.
  6. Demonstrate knowledge of some of the main areas of the social sciences in the environment.
  7. Identify processes sciences, life sciences and social sciences in the surrounding environment and evaluate them properly and originally.
  8. Information from texts written in foreign languages.
  9. Integrate environmental information with environmental knowledge acquired from the sequence of observation, recognition, synthesis and modeling.
  10. Learn and apply in practice the knowledge acquired and to solve problems.
  11. Learn and apply the theoretical and practical aspects of environmental impact assessment principles.
  12. Observe, recognize, analyze, measure and properly and safely represent environmental processes.
  13. Prepare a report explaining the results obtained in the performance of work in the field of environmental sciences.
  14. Teaming developing personal values regarding social skills and teamwork.
  15. Work autonomously

Content

Part 1) Concepts, regulations and methods. Impacts on the biotic medium

 

1. Basic concepts on the Environmental Assessment and basic legislation

2. Structure and content of the Environmental Impact Studies

3. Identification and qualitative evaluation of impacts

4. Assessment of the magnitude of impacts and weighting of environmental factors

5. Mitigation measures of environmental impacts and Program of Environmental Surveillance

6. Evaluation of the biotic medium, ecological criteria to mitigate environmental impacts.

7. Criteria of valuation of species and protection figures

8. Criteria for the valuation of protected natural habitats and spaces

9. Case study with special impact on the natural environment

 

 

Part 2) The impacts on the physical environment

 

1. Introduction to the physical environment.

2. Evaluation of the impact of the spills.

3. Basic information for EIA of the physical environment.

4. Evaluation of the erosion process

5. Impacts in the hydrological cycle

6. Impacts on the river environment: water and sediments.

7. Impacts on the hydrogeological environment

8. Slope impacts.

9. Acoustic impact

10. Study of cases of special incidence in the physical environment

 

 

Part 3) The Environmental Impact Assessment from the social perspective

 

1. The social environment as part of the environment and the impact assessment

2. The temporary dimension. Discount and inflation

3. Techniques of quantification of social impacts. Input-output tables, production functions, others

4. Methods of valuation and social perception. Revealed and declared preferences

5. Aggregations and evaluation. Cost-benefit analysis, multicriterion, Leopold, Battelle

6. The equivalence analysis

7. Preventive, corrective and compensatory measures

8. Surveillance and cost quantification program

9. Applications


Methodology

The subject combines theory classes, individual practices, practical work and a field trip.

(a) Lectures (theory classes) where the concepts and methods of the discipline are explained. The theoretical the complicated and important points of each didactic unit are highlighted and addressed. Subsequently, the student has to assimilate the concepts explained with the bibliographic information and his individual work.

(b) Methodology classes (seminars) where the explanation of the foundations of the main valuation and evaluation methods will be combined with calculations in the computer through case studies.

(c) Practical work (classroom practices) oriented to the knowledge of the processes and the documents involved in environmental evaluation.

(d) Field practice where a field trip will be made to observe and discuss on the ground the impacts caused by human actions.

 

Annotation: Within the schedule set by the centre or degree programme, 15 minutes of one class will be reserved for students to evaluate their lecturers and their courses or modules through questionnaires.


Activities

Title Hours ECTS Learning Outcomes
Type: Directed      
Classroom practice 16 0.64 2, 10, 11, 5, 6, 4, 3, 13, 7, 9, 12, 8, 1, 15, 14
Field trips 8 0.32 2, 10, 11, 5, 6, 4, 3, 13, 7, 9, 12, 8, 1, 15, 14
Lectures (theory) 50 2 2, 10, 11, 5, 6, 4, 3, 13, 7, 9, 12, 1
Seminars 4 0.16 2, 10, 11, 5, 6, 4, 3, 13, 7, 9, 12, 8, 1, 15, 14
Type: Supervised      
Documentation and bibliography 12 0.48 2, 10, 11, 5, 6, 4, 3, 13, 7, 9, 12, 8, 1, 15, 14
Type: Autonomous      
Individual study 100 4 2, 10, 11, 5, 6, 4, 3, 13, 7, 9, 12, 8, 1, 15, 14

Assessment

Separate evaluations will be carried out for the biotic and physical environment part, and social environment part and for the respective practical works.

The calculation of the final grade will be made according to the following weights, expressed as a percentage:

- Half biotic and half physical, 50%, 20% of which will come from a practical joint work of biotic environment and physical environment.

- Social media, 50%, 20% of wich will come from a practical work of social environment.

The continuous evaluation involves at least 3 evaluation activities throughout the course.

To be able to pass, you must have a grade not lower than 3.5 out of 10 in each test (from the continuous assessment or the June exam if applicable) and a final average equal to or greater than 5.0 in the subject. The format, procedure and specific content of the evaluation tests of each part will be detailed by the corresponding teacher at the beginning of the course.

The student who does not pass the continuous assessment has the option of taking the June test and then for them the grades of the partial exams will not count. Only partial exams may be subject to evaluation in the June test; the rest of activities (works) will not be re-evaluated.

To participate in the recovery exam, the student must have been previously evaluated in a set of activities the weight of which equals a minimum of two thirds of the total grade of the subject. Therefore, the student must take at least 3 of the 4 proposed evaluative activities (2 tests and 2 assignments). To participate in the June test, the student must have obtained at least a 3.5 average in the subject in the continuous assessment.

A not presented in the June test implies a grade equal to that obtained in the evaluation of the course.

Those who exceed the final mitjana requirement equal to or greater than 5.0 and not 3.5 in each test will be qualified in the dossier with the average obtained in the continuous evaluation with a maximum limit of 4.7.

Single evaluation

Students who have accepted the single assessment modality must take a final test that evaluates the 3 parts of the subject (Biotic Environment, Physical Environment and Social Environment). The first 2 parts represent 50% of the exam and the third, the other 50%.

Both the field trip and the seminar are compulsory attendance

The exam can include both open questions(theoretical or exercise type) and multiple-choice questions or True-False. In the case of the Biotic and Physical Environment part, questions from the field trip are included, and in the Social Environment part, the questions include what was worked on in the Problems in the Classroom sessions.

To pass the subject, at least a 3.5 mark must be obtained in each of its 2 parts, that is, the Biotic and Physical Environment, on the one hand, and the Social Environment, on the other.

This exam represents 60% of the final grade for the subject, 20% comes from the work done in the Biotic and Physical Environment part, and the other 20% from the work done in the Social Environment part. Both papers must be submitted on the date established for continuous assessment students.

If the student does not reach the minimum grade required (5.0) and/or does not exceed 3.5 in each of the different evaluations presented, the student has another opportunity to pass the subject, through the recovery exam. established by the coordination of the degree on the date determined, being the same day and time in which one or both partials of the student body in general can be recovered with the continuous evaluation format. In this test, 60% of the final mark can be recovered, which corresponds to theory, field trips and problems. The works, both in their written and oral part, are not recoverable.


Assessment Activities

Title Weighting Hours ECTS Learning Outcomes
Partial exam natural environment 30% 2 0.08 2, 10, 11, 5, 6, 4, 3, 13, 7, 9, 12, 8, 1, 15, 14
Partial exam social environment 30% 2 0.08 2, 10, 11, 5, 6, 4, 3, 13, 7, 9, 12, 8, 1, 15
Practical work natural environment 20% 16 0.64 2, 10, 11, 5, 6, 4, 3, 13, 7, 9, 12, 8, 1, 15, 14
Practical work of social environment 20% 15 0.6 2, 10, 11, 5, 6, 4, 3, 13, 7, 9, 12, 8, 1, 15, 14

Bibliography

Azqueta, D. (2002). Introducción a la Economía Ambiental. Ed. McGraw Hill: Madrid. 

Cantó, S., P. Riera & A. Borrego. (2009). La evaluación de impacto ambiental en España. Coste y limitaciones. Economía Industrial, 371:113-120.

Conesa Fernández-Vitora, V. (2010). Guía Metodológica para la Evaluación del Impacto Ambiental. Mundi-Prensa. 4ª edició. Madrid.

Domenico, P.A. & F.W. Schwartz. (1990). Physical and chemical hydrogeology. Wiley.

Fetter, C.W. (1988). Applied hydrogeology. MacMillan.

Fetter, C.W. (1993). Contaminant hydrogeology. MacMillan.

Field, B. y M. Field. (2002). Economía Ambiental. Ed. McGraw Hill: Madrid. 

Garmendia A. (2010). Evaluacion de impacto ambiental. Ed Pearson Educación, Madrid, 398p.

Gómez Orea, D. (2003). Evaluación de Impacto Ambiental, un instrumento preventivo para la gestión ambiental. 2ª edició ampliada. Editorial Mundi-Prensa. Madrid, Barcelona, México, 749p.

Keller, E.A & R.H. Blodgett. (2007). Riesgos naturales. Procesos de la Tierra como riesgos, desastres y catástrofes. Pearson.

Labandeira, X., C. León y M.X. Vázquez. (2006). Economía Ambiental. Prentice Hall Iberia, Madrid, 353p.

Mallarach, J.M. (1999). Criteris i mètodes d’avaluació del patrimoni natural. Documents dels Quaderns de medi ambient Núm. 2. Departament de Medi Ambient. Generalitat de Catalunya.

McCarthy, D. (1997). Essentials of soil mechanics and foundations. Prentice-Hall.

Rau, J.G. & D. C. Wooten. (1980). Environmental Impact Analysis Handbook. McGraw-Hill.

Riera, P., D. Garcia, B. Kriström & R. Brännlund. (2016). Manual de economía ambiental y de los recursos naturales (segunda edición, revisada y ampliada). Madrid, Paraninfo.


Software

-