Logo UAB
2023/2024

Bachelor's Degree Final Project

Code: 101628 ECTS Credits: 12
Degree Type Year Semester
2500261 Education Studies OB 4 0

Contact

Name:
Patricia Olmos Rueda
Email:
patricia.olmos@uab.cat

Teaching groups languages

You can check it through this link. To consult the language you will need to enter the CODE of the subject. Please note that this information is provisional until 30 November 2023.


Prerequisites

The Final Project (FP) represents the final module in the degree programme; therefore, students areadvised to enroll in this module only when they are certain they will complete their studies during the year ofenrolment.

To enroll FP it is required to have achieved at least two thirds of the total ECTS of the whole programme.


Objectives and Contextualisation

The Final Project (FP) must be a project oriented to the development of a basic research or an innovation that is developed in the professional area to the specific area of knowledge student is enrolled. In any case, it must have all the sections of a research work and must serve to emerge the skills and knowledge associated with the degree in Pedagogy.
The FP is carried out  autonomous, based on a topic agreed with the teaching staff that will supervise its completion.
The final document of the FP must be different and individual for each student, therefore, it will not be possible to accept works that present any section that is equal to the other work presented. This, however, does not prevent sharing knowledge between students and being part of the research together.


Competences

  • Act with ethical responsibility and respect for fundamental rights and duties, diversity and democratic values.
  • Analyse and understand the theoretical, historical, cultural, political, environmental and legal references and situations involved in education and training proposals.
  • Design plans, programs, projects, activities and resources adapted to the education and training contexts, in the face-to-face and virtual forms.
  • Foster improvement process on the basis of the results of research or needs assessment processes.
  • Identify educational approaches and problems, inquire about them: obtain, record, process and interpret relevant information to issue supported judgments that enhance education and training.
  • Introduce changes in the methods and processes of the field of knowledge to provide innovative responses to the needs and demands of society.
  • Manage information related to the professional environment for decision-making and reporting.
  • Take account of social, economic and environmental impacts when operating within one's own area of knowledge.
  • Take sex- or gender-based inequalities into consideration when operating within one's own area of knowledge.

Learning Outcomes

  1. Acquire the main conceptual and epistemological references that make up the main theories of education.
  2. Analyse a situation and identify its points for improvement.
  3. Analyse the current educational reality by properly applying the philosophical and anthropological concepts.
  4. Assessing the value of correction, adaptation and acceptability in oral and written productions.
  5. Communicate using language that is not sexist or discriminatory.
  6. Critically analyse the principles, values and procedures that govern the exercise of the profession.
  7. Design plans and programs that are adapted to the educational and training contexts in face-to-face and virtual form.
  8. Design projects and actions adapted to the education environment and the recipients thereof.
  9. Explain the explicit or implicit code of practice of one's own area of knowledge.
  10. Identify situations in which a change or improvement is needed.
  11. Properly formulate research problems and hypotheses in real or simulated contexts.
  12. Propose new methods or well-founded alternative solutions.
  13. Propose new ways to measure the success or failure of the implementation of innovative proposals or ideas.
  14. Propose viable projects and actions to boost social, economic and environmental benefits.
  15. Propose ways to evaluate projects and actions for improving sustainability.
  16. Selecting the strategies and procedures for change according to the context.
  17. Understand the characteristics and conditions that make up educational proposals in contexts of diversity.
  18. Understand the theoretical and legal references of educational institutions and demonstrate an understanding of the diversity of actions involved in their operations.
  19. Weigh up the impact of any long- or short-term difficulty, harm or discrimination that could be caused to certain persons or groups by the actions or projects.
  20. Weigh up the risks and opportunities of both one's own and other people's proposals for improvement.
  21. Writing reports about the socio-educational context in an area based on the data obtained from this area.

Content

The FP offers a wide range of topics related to the different areas of the degree.


Methodology

The virtual classroom enabled is the TFE Platform (https://tfe.uab.cat). It is the space for the exchange of information between the coordination team, the tutor and the students, as well as the space where the different evidence of learning requested throughout the course should be delivered. Therefore, it is essential to consult this space periodically, as well as the e-mail address associated with it, to ensure that all the necessary information is received for proper progression and monitoring of the FP.

Students will be able to select the topic of the FP from those available in strict order of the average grade of their academic record during the period established at the beginning of the course.

The work methodology is divided into supervision sessions, independent work and assessment activities. The supervised activity includes two different forms of seminars that can be done in group or individually: compulsory seminars and extension seminars. There are 4 compulsory seminars distributed across the different phases of the process. The compulsory seminars are face-to-face. The first compulsory seminar is recommended to be a group seminar. In the case of students taking part in mobility programs, all seminars may be taken virtually. Students may also request up to 4 hours of extension seminars, which will be mutually agreed upon with the tutor.

Considering the autonomous nature of the work, no more than 4 hours of extension seminars may be taken without a justification of the need for differentiated instruction.

The FP is considered as a continuous process with 3 different phases: a starting phase in which the work is specified and proposed (with an approximate workload of 25 hours), a development phase (with approximately 75 hours of work), and a final and closing phase that includes the presentation of the final report (with an approximate workload of 50 hours).

The FP process will begin with a plenary session in which the general aspects of the elaboration of the FP will be explained.

As part of the process, the following must be carried out:

  • A first mandatory seminar on topics and types of work and the process and monitoring to be agreed between the tutor and the student. This seminar will be called by the tutor once the assignments have been definitively published. After this seminar, the rest of the obligatory seminars -which should not exceed 8 hours of dedication- and the extension seminars, up to a maximum of 4 additional hours, will be programmed by mutual agreement.
  • A second mandatory seminar on at least two of the first sections of the script. This seminar can be held before or after the first delivery, depending on the needs of the work. The date of the second seminar must be fixed in the first seminar.
  • A third mandatory seminar on the progress of the project, consistent with the sections of the script and the agreements established between the tutor and the student. This seminar must be held before the second delivery.
  • A fourth and last mandatory seminar on the progress of the project, where all the sections are worked on, before the last delivery (final report of the FP).

The seminars, lasting up to 90 minutes, are intended as a space for discussion, resolution of doubts and proposals to advance the project. It is recommended that students submit the working document prior to the seminar with the progress and doubts so that the tutor can prepare the meeting.

During this process, students are required to hand in the 3 assessed documents (detailed in the assessment section). All deliveries will be made in the virtual space provided.

ORIENTATION AND TYPOLOGY OF THE FP

Two different types of FP can be chosen: the professionalization option and the research option (which can be basic research on a topic or an in-depth study of a theoretical concept). Regardless of the option chosen, the form of presentation of the FP can be agreed on with the tutor (report format or research article format).

Regardless of the format chosen, the FP must be written in CATALAN, except in the case of students of the Degree in Primary Education in English, who must write the FP in ANGLÈS.

All FPs must include a reference section (according to APA guidelines). The APA regulations can be consulted at: https://ddd.uab.cat/pub/recdoc/2016/145881/citrefapa_a2016.pdf

 

A) PROFESSIONALIZATION OPTION: Formulation of an intervention/innovation project in a particular socio-educational context. This FP modality allows four types of work to be considered: 

  • Intervention FP. It consists of developing an educational or socio-educational action proposal in a specific context. This modality can take the form of: a) the diagnostic study of a reality, b) the design and implementation of a project in a professional field, c) the evaluation of an existing project (it is necessary that the project is being implemented).
  • Creation and innovation FP. It consists of developing a proposal aimed at the creation, elaboration, design of educational and/or socio-educational products or services in a specific context.
  • Entrepreneurship FP. It consists of developing a proposal for entrepreneurship (traditional or social) in the educational or socio-educational field.
  • Service-Learning FP. This modality consists of carrying out a work of real application in an entity, and requires close coordination with that entity to develop the project. It also requires the supervision of the academic tutor (more information at: Més que un TFG!). This modality admits only annual FPs.

 In the case of FP projects that are contextualized in the same school or institution where the student’s internship is done, students may benefit from the analysis of the context and other data; butinNO CASE can both reports be written with the same content. That is to say, the internship report and the FP cannot be the same in any of their sections. Duplicating material will be considered as self-plagiarism, and therefore will mean a failure in the FP.

 

B) RESEARCH OPTION: 

  • Empirical research proposal FP. It consists of an analytical research proposal that will include a theoretical framework, a working hypothesis or objectives, an empirical part with results, discussion and conclusions. This modality must include basic research methodologies and techniques (search, selection and use of tools to capture information, as well as analysis and interpretation).
  • FP based on a systematic literature review. It consists of a study of theoretical foundation (essay or monograph) that involves a theoretical, critical or comparative analysis as a basis for an in-depth discussion or argumentation on a topic. This modality must include a broad bibliographical review on the subject nd an explicit discussion in relation to the theoretical frameworks and available knowledge.

 

STRUCTURE OF THE FINAL REPORT OF THE FP (3rd evaluation evidence)

Regardless of the FP option chosen, the 3rd evaluation evidence, which corresponds to the final report or memory of the FP, can be presented in two different formats: 

1.- REPORT FORMAT

The person presenting the FP in this format must follow the following formal aspects:

  • Maximum length of about 70,000 characters (spaces included) (25/30 pages approximately). This does not include the section of bibliographical references and annexes that will be presented separately with the complementary information that is required.
  • The title page should include:
    • The name of the Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona and the degree taken.
    • Author's name.
    • Title of the FP
    • Date and date of submission,
    • Name and Department to which the tutor is assigned.
  • After the title page, the table of contents of the FP should be included. In addition, an abstract (and recpectively keyword) in Catalan, Spanish and English must be included.

 2.- SCIENTIFIC ARTICLE FORMAT 

The student who chooses to present the dissertation in this format must follow a presentation policy similar to the requirements of the presentation in a scientific or professional journal. In this sense, the aim is to encourage the student to submit the text to be published. Therefore, the following generic guidelines are proposed:

  • The maximum length should be about 30,000 characters with spaces included (approximately 10-12 A4 pages).
  • Abstract of 7 or 8 lines in Catalan and the translation of the abstract into English.
  • A list of 5 to a maximum of 8 keywords.
  • A section of bibliographical references, cited in the text and according to APA norms.
  • Outline: introduction, definition of the context, theoretical approach, exposition of the proposed methodology or planning, results obtained, discussion, conclusions and final evaluation 
  • Diagrams, tables, graphs, photographs, and/or video or audio recordings that make the content of the article more understandable can be attached at the end of the text.
  • The cover page should include:
    • The name of the Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona and the degree studied.
    • Author's name and e-mail address.
    • Title of the FP.
    • Date and call for submission.
    • Name and Department to which the tutor is assigned.

If the tutor considers it feasible, the student may be encouraged to publish the article in a scientific journal in the field. The tutor should assist the student in adapting the article to the criteria of rigor and presentation of the chosen journal.The intellectual property of the FP will belong to the author of the FP. In any case, it is understood that the tutor has also contributed to the elaboration of the study and of the article, so in case of publication, the consent of the author and the tutor will be required. The tutor will be listed as a second co-author.

It is necessary that the student takes courses on tools and resources for academic papers, for a better management of the bibliography and elaboration of the theoretical framework of his/her FP (the Humanities Library offers a range of virtual courses https://www.uab.cat/web/que-oferim/cursos-de-formacio-1345708785493.html). As a minimum, the student must take the activity "Eines i recursos per realitzar el teu treball acadèmic", offered by the Humanities Library. The course certificate must be submitted with the final submission of the FP.

Annotation: Within the schedule set by the centre or degree programme, 15 minutes of one class will be reserved for students to evaluate their lecturers and their courses or modules through questionnaires.


Activities

Title Hours ECTS Learning Outcomes
Type: Directed      
Activity “Eines i recursos per realitzar el teu treball acadèmic” 2 0.08 11, 12, 16, 4
Plenary session 2 0.08 5, 7, 8, 13, 14
Type: Supervised      
Tutorials 14 0.56 1, 6, 3, 2, 18, 17, 5, 7, 8, 9, 11, 10, 20, 15, 12, 13, 14, 16, 19, 4
Type: Autonomous      
Autonomous Work 282 11.28 1, 6, 3, 2, 18, 17, 7, 8, 11, 10, 20, 15, 12, 13, 14, 21, 16, 19, 4

Assessment

This course does not have a single asssessment system.

The FP Pedagogy degree evaluation arises from two differentiated activities:

  • Project Report.
  • Project Presentation.

The assessment of the FP will be based on 3 pieces of evidence:

Evidence 1: Project approach. Qualitative assessment. The 1st piece of evidence for assessment is the document where the project to be developed in the FP is planned, understanding that it is a proposal that will evolve throughout the course. Depending on the type of FP to be carried out, the manuscript sections to be included will be, for example: statement of the problem or need, objectives, contextualization, theoretical basis, design/proposal/methodology. In the first seminar, the tutor will agree with the students on the sections to be included in each of the deliveries. The rubric to be used for assessment will be available in the virtual space. The delivery date is until November 13 (February call) and until January 8 (June and September call).

Evidence 2: Development. Qualitative assessment. For this 2nd piece of evidence for assessment, a document must be submitted explaining the development of the project based on what has been proposed in the first evidence and considering the indications made in the evaluation of the previous evidence as well as in the seminars. In this second document, it must be demonstrated that the student has progressed in the work corresponding to the sections of the script agreed on between the tutor and the students. The rubric to be used for assessment can be found in the virtual space. The due date is December 11 (February call) and between February 19 and April 22 (June and September call).

Evidence 3. Final Report (Numerical grade from 0 to 10). This is the final report of the FP where all the sections of the FP manuscript must be included. It must be written in CATALAN. Remember that if plagiarism is detected or if there are problems relating to communicative competence (spelling mistakes, syntactic errors, etc.) the work will be failed. The rubric to be used for assessment can be found in the virtual space. The due date is January 22 (February call), June 3 (June call) and September 2 (September call).

The delivery of three prices of evidence is mandatory and CAN NOT BE RE-SUBMITTED.

If a student does not submit any evidence, either of the approach or of the development or if the quality of the work is very poor, it will have an impact on the grade of the final submission, in the criterion on monitoring of the FP. In addition, if the student does not hand in any of the evidence on the established date, he/she will not be able to do it later.

The documents must be submitted through the space provided by the coordination of the degree on the dates established between the student and the tutor.

The tutor's feedback must also be sent through the space provided for this purpose, within a maximum of 15 days after the date of delivery of the evidence. These deadlines are for the ordinary call in June. For the first two deliveries, a qualitative evaluation rubric with the defined criteria is available. For the final evaluation there is a rubric for each type of FP, which will result in a numerical grade from 0 to 10. The tutor will have to include feedback on all the deliveries. Both the characteristics of the documents and their evaluation rubrics will be published in the virtual space.

On the other hand, the FP is evaluated by a tribunal of three teaching figures from the Degree in Pedagogy with the following procedure:

  • The tribunal will be held:
    • February call: throughout the week of February 12 to 15.
    • June call: during the week of June 25 to 28.
    • September call: September 5.

The standard hours of the tribunals will be from 9:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. Once the students who appear for each of the calls (February, June, September)are specified, the coordination will make public in the communication spaces (Faculty website and virtual space) the relationship of Commitees with the assignment of the students to each of these.
The presentation of the FP before the tribunal will take place in a maximum of 10 minutes. The tribunal will ask any questions or considerations it deems appropriate. In order to evaluate the FP, the tribuanl has a rubric that will be made public in the enabled virtual space. Students are obliged to attend the entire FP presentations of the tribunal they are assigned to.
Given that the defenses are public, in addition to the tribunal and the summoned students, other people who wish may attend as members of the public, as long as they respect the schedules and procedures of the FP defense. The final qualification of the FP is the result of the evaluation of the tutor figure and the tribunal in the percentages assigned to each activity. In order to pass the subject, each of the two activities (work report and defense of the work) must be approved with a minimum grade of 5. If one of the activities is suspended, this will be the grade that will be recorded in the minutes.

In the case that a % of plagiarism higher than 20% is detected, the grade of the FP will be 0 points. Thus, although students can work on the same topic, the final report must be unpublished and completely individual. In accordance with UAB regulations, other measures such as the opening of a disciplinary academic record will be considered.

In order to present the FP in the September call, it is necessary that the interested person requests the change of call at Gestió Acadèmica, during the period established for this purpose. Otherwise, the grade that will appear in the June call will be a NOT ASSESSED and the student will not have the change to sit in September.

If the student does not pass the FP, he/she will have to register again since there is no recovery option.


Assessment Activities

Title Weighting Hours ECTS Learning Outcomes
Project Presentation 40% 0 0 6, 5, 9, 11, 15, 13, 14, 19
Project Raport 60% 0 0 1, 6, 3, 2, 18, 17, 5, 7, 8, 11, 10, 20, 15, 12, 13, 14, 21, 16, 4

Bibliography

Supervisors will offer students individual guidance on the most suitable bibliography for their chosen topics.

General references:

Blanch, S., Pérez, E., i Silvente, J. (2018). Com citar i referenciar en els textos acadèmics. Compilació basada en la normativa APA. Recuperat de https://ddd.uab.cat/pub/recdoc/2016/145881/citrefapa_a2016.pdf

Caro, M.T. (2015). Guía de trabajos fin de grado en educación. Madrid: Pirámide.

Ferrer, V., Carmona, M., i Soria, V. (Eds.) (2012). El trabajo de fin de grado. Guía para estudiantes, docentes y agentes colaboradores. Madrid: McGraw-Hill.

Quivy, R., i Van Carnpenhoudt, L. (2005). Manual de investigación en ciencias sociales. Mexico DF: Limusa.

Mercader Rubio, I., Gutiérrez Ángel, N., & Pérez Esteban, M.D. (2023). Guía práctica para la elaboración de un trabajo fin de estudios (TFG y TFM) en el ámbito de la educación y la psicología. Edual.

Sánchez, A., Olmos Rueda, P., Torrado Fonseca, M., i García López, J. (2016). Trabajos de fin de Grado y

Postgrado. Madrid: ALJIBE

Sancho, J. (2014). Com escriure i presentar el millor treball acadèmic: guia pràctica per a estudiants i professors. Vic: Eumo.

Villar, J.J. (2010). Cómo hacer un trabajo final de carrera para los estudios de grado: notas para estructurar de manera práctica el trabajo final de carrera y plan de marketing para los estudios de grado. Barcelona: Astro Uno.

More information in DDD wher the bets FYP are published.

 


Software

None specific software is used for developing this subject.