Degree | Type | Year | Semester |
---|---|---|---|
2500239 Art History | OB | 2 | 1 |
2500241 Archaeology | OT | 3 | 0 |
2500241 Archaeology | OT | 4 | 0 |
2503702 Ancient Studies | OT | 4 | 1 |
Professors Jorge Rodriguez Ariza and Heriberto Abruña Marti are not part of the teaching team.
You can check it through this link. To consult the language you will need to enter the CODE of the subject. Please note that this information is provisional until 30 November 2023.
Good level of reading skills in foreign languages is required (English, Italian, French).
To provide fundamental knowledge of stylistic, technical, iconographic and historical nature of the artistic Roman productions.
The student will be qualified to analyse the works, to locate them in the period in which they were produced and to relate them with the cultural context of their time.
1. Discovering Roman art: ¿where and when did it happen?
2. The genesis. Between Etruscans and Greeks.
3. Working in the workshop.
4. Roman art and the urban setting.
5. Art, ritual, and funerary space.
6. Art and self-representation in the provinces.
7. When it was not the man who was represented. What do we know about it?
8. In the genesis of Western art.
- Theoretical lessons.
- Learning by tasks: Essays and, if applicable, microlessons, using bibliographic documentation and diverse resources of specialized information.
- Tutorials by using the Moodle.
- Tutorship of the supervised activities and the work of the student.
Annotation: Within the schedule set by the centre or degree programme, 15 minutes of one class will be reserved for students to evaluate their lecturers and their courses or modules through questionnaires.
Title | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|
Type: Directed | |||
Theoretical and practical lessons | 43.5 | 1.74 | 6, 7, 31, 1, 19, 23, 46, 14 |
Type: Supervised | |||
Integrated tutorships to support learning and project preparation. Challenges Based Learning. Feedback/feedforward | 5 | 0.2 | 6, 7, 31, 1, 19, 23, 14 |
Type: Autonomous | |||
Elaboration of projects, documentary and bibliographical consultations, personal study | 70 | 2.8 | 6, 7, 31, 1, 19, 23, 46, 14 |
Evidence 1:
Group project (4 points, 40 % of the final grade). Minimum mark to be able to take the average: 2 points out of 4. If the grade is lower, the teacher will indicate to the group how to improve it and the date of delivery of the required correction task.
Evidence 2:
Exposition of the group project (2 points, 20 % of the final grade). Minimum mark to be able to take the average: 1 points out of 2. If the grade is lower, the teacher will indicate to the group how to improve it and the date of delivery of the required correction task.
Evidence 3:
Proof of concepts (2,5 points, 25% of the final grade). Minimum grade to be able to average 1 point out of 2,5. Recoverable activity.
Evidence 4:
Classroom activities (1,5 points, 15 % of the final grade). This activity is not recoverable.
The final mark is the result of the sum of the marks obtained in the 4 evidences, provided that the minimum marks indicated in activities 1,2 and 3 have been obtained.
Students will receive a grade of "not evaluable" if they have not taken any of the evaluative activities.
At the time of each evaluation activity, the teacher will inform the students (Moodle) of the procedure and date of revision of the grades.
Only the students who have not passed and have sat for the compulsory activities have the right to a reassessment – the date is set by the Facultie’s Academic Management.
In the event of a student committing any irregularity that may lead to a significant variation in the grade awarded to an assessment activity, the student will be given a zero for this activity and it will not be recoverable, regardless of any disciplinary process that may take place. In the event of several irregularities in assessment activities of the same subject, the student will be given a zero as the final grade for this subject.
SINGLE EVALUATION
Coursework 40% (4 points, Recovery: improvement indicated by the teacher)
Coursework status report 10% (1 points, Recovery: improvement indicated by the teacher)
Examination of concepts 50% (5 points, a 2 must be obtained in order to obtain an average. Recoverable activity)
Title | Weighting | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
Classroom activities | 15% | 3 | 0.12 | 6, 7, 3, 5, 9, 12, 19, 17, 18, 40, 37, 39, 38, 22, 25, 33, 32, 28, 30, 14, 47, 53, 52 |
Exposition of the group project | 20% | 9 | 0.36 | 3, 12, 22, 24, 13, 36, 48, 44, 14, 47, 21, 49, 53, 52, 50 |
Group project | 40% | 18.25 | 0.73 | 7, 4, 11, 10, 8, 9, 41, 12, 40, 43, 22, 20, 51, 33, 32, 34, 28, 30, 35, 36, 48, 46, 44, 14, 21, 49, 53, 52, 50 |
Proof of content | 25% | 1.25 | 0.05 | 6, 7, 4, 3, 5, 31, 11, 41, 42, 1, 2, 15, 16, 19, 17, 18, 39, 43, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 20, 51, 33, 29, 28, 35, 46, 45, 14, 47, 21, 52 |
AA.VV. (1981-1998): Lexicon Iconographicum Mytologiae Classicae (= LIMC), vols. I-VIII, Zurich-Munich.
AA.VV. (2006): Couleurs et mattières dans l'antiquité: textes, tecniques et pratiques, Paris.
Andreae, Bernard (1984): Arte romano, Roma.
Anguissola, Anna (2018), Supports and Roman Marble Sculpture, Cambridge.
Anguissola, Anna (2021): Pliny the Elder and the Matter of Memory: An Encyclopediatic Workshop, Roledge UK.
Baldasarre, Ida et alii (2002): Pittura romana: dall'ellenismo al tardo-antico, Milano.
Barbet, Alix (1985): La Peinture murale romaine: les styles décoratives pompéiens, Paris.
Borg, Barbara E. (2015): A companion to Roman Art, Chichester.
Elsner, Jas (2007): Roman Eyes: Visuality and Subjectivity in Art and Text, Princeton-Oxford.
Falcón Martínez, Constantino et alii (1997): Diccionario de mitología clásica, 2 vols., Madrid.
Friedland, Elisa A.et alt. (2015): The Oxford Handbook of Roman Sculpture, Oxford.
Fejfer, Jane (2008): Roman portraits in context, Berlin-New York.
Lain Ferris, Lain (2017): The Mirror of Venus: Women in Roman Art, Gloucestershire.
Giuman, Marco (2013): Archeologia dello sguardo, Roma.
Gros, Pierre (1996): L'Architecture romaine I, Paris.
Gros, Pierre (2001): L'Architecture romaine II, Paris.
Gros, Pierre - Torelli, Mario (1994): Storia dell'urbanistica. Il mondo romano, Roma-Bari.
Grossman, Janet (2003): Looking at Greek and Roman sculpture in stone: A guide to terms, styles and techniques, Los Angeles.
Hölscher, Tonio (1987): Il linguaggio dell'arte romana, Torino.
Hölsher, Tonio (2018): Visual power in Ancient Greece and Rome. Between art and social reality, Berkeley.
Kleiner, Diana (1993): Roman Sculpture, Nova York.
Kousser, Rachel M. (2008): Hellenistic and Roman sculpture. The allure of the classical, Cambridge.
Lancha, Janine (1997): Mosaïque et culture dans l'Occident romain, Ier.- Vè. siècles, Rome.
Lapatin, Kenneth (2015): Luxus: The sumptuous Art of Greece and Rome, Malibú.
Marconi, Clemente (2015): The Oxford handbook of Greek and Roman art and architrecture, New York.
Mattingly, David J. (2011): Imperialism, power and Identity. Experiencing the Roman Empire, New Jersey.
Ocampo, Estela (1988): Diccionario de términos artísticos y arqueológicos, Barcelona.
Ranatala, Jussi, Harlow, Mary (2019): Gender, Memory, and Identity in the Roman World, Amsterdamm.
Scott, Michael (2013): Space and Society in the Greek and Roman Worlds, Cambridge.
Squire, Michael (2016): Sight and the Ancient Senses, Londres.
Turcan, Robert (1995): L'Art romain dans l'histoire: six siècles d'expressions de la romanité, Paris.
Zanker, Paul (1992): Augusto y el poder de las imágenes, Madrid.
No specific software is required.