Degree | Type | Year | Semester |
---|---|---|---|
4314949 General Health Psychology | OB | 2 | 1 |
Having passed the TFM I subject, which implies having defined the TFM project, searching for documentation and having a first version of the introduction to the TFM.
The philosophy of the TFM is to confront the student with a real research problem related to general health psychology, either by joining a research team to contribute to a line already started, or by identifying, with the help of the tutor / s, a need, problem or lack of health interest. To achieve this purpose, the TFM places the student in a position to deploy and combine all the skills developed so far in order to 1) solve the problem or question that you address and, in this way, 2) demonstrate that you have the capacity for which the MUPGS will accredit you: that of using your knowledge and skills to solve real problems.
The student can choose one of the following options depending on his/her interests and the interests or proposals allowed by the tutor supervising their work:
A. Systematic Review following PRISMA Guidelines
B.Empirical Research
C. Development of a new tool for Health Psychology practice: therapy programmes, health guidelines, e-health project, assessment procedures....
The student develops the competences acquired during the Master’s Degree in order to achieve the option he/she has chosen (Systematic Review, Empirical Research or Development of a New Tool) following the guidelines provided by the tutor. The student works autonomously and is assisted by his/her tutor. The hours spent on each task (autonomous work, tutorials, assessment and coordination) are described in the following table
Annotation: Within the schedule set by the centre or degree programme, 15 minutes of one class will be reserved for students to evaluate their lecturers and their courses or modules through questionnaires.
Title | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|
Type: Directed | |||
Assessment and coordination | 1 | 0.04 | 7, 3, 15 |
Type: Supervised | |||
Follow-up sessions with the academic tutor | 12 | 0.48 | 7, 3, 15 |
Type: Autonomous | |||
Developing MD work | 209 | 8.36 | 7, 3, 15 |
To pass the MD, the student must achieve 5 over 10 or more points adding scores obtained in Evidences 1, 2a and 2b, and a minimum score of 6.5 (over 10) on Evidence Wtiting report (extern).
Link to the avaluation rules of the Faculty (https://www.uab.cat/web/estudiar/graus/graus/avaluacions-1345722525858.html)
Title | Weighting | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
Oral communication | 40 | 1 | 0.04 | 4, 7, 15 |
Writing report (extern) | 40 | 1 | 0.04 | 7, 2 |
Writing report (supervisor) | 20 | 1 | 0.04 | 10, 6, 1, 8, 9, 11, 7, 14, 3, 5, 12, 17, 13, 15, 16 |
http://www.apastyle.org
www.coneixement.accio.gencat.cat/eines
In this subject no specific software is served