Degree | Type | Year | Semester |
---|---|---|---|
4313754 Psychopedagogy | OT | 0 | A |
No prerequisites are needed to complete this module.
The Master's participants have taken the subjects of 'Diversity and Curriculum' and 'Assessment and diagnosis of educational needs', so they have an approach to the current principles and problems that occur in the field of educational psychology. Subsequently and in parallel to the current subject, subjects related to intervention in different educational stages or with different groups of users have been started. Therefore, they are familiar with the spaces and users of the intervention.
This subject analyzes and deepens the models and practices that accompany the organization, management and development of territorial support services, which channel demands and provides support to educational centres and other institutions that require it. Its focus is, therefore, on the knowledge and analysis of the organizational, management and leadership systems of psycho-pedagogical institutions and services. Its knowledge is essential for the educational psychologist, as it is a space for professional activity and as a reference for diagnoses and treatments at the school level.
The objectives of the subject are:
When specifying the contents, it is necessary to consider the following descriptors:
The development of the subject will focus the intervention on the needs and possibilities of the training user. It is understood that the student is active and autonomous during the learning process and that he/she has the support of the teacher. In this sense, the teaching staff will support the students at all times, providing them with the necessary information and resources so that learning can be generated (master classes, selection of readings, bibliographic orientations, etc.) and will accompany them in their autonomous learning, proposing activities as diversified as possible (individual, group, reflection, Internet search, analysis of practical cases, etc.).
Annotation: Within the schedule set by the centre or degree programme, 15 minutes of one class will be reserved for students to evaluate their lecturers and their courses or modules through questionnaires.
Title | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|
Type: Directed | |||
Presencial large group (lecture and workshops application) | 60 | 2.4 | 2, 5, 6, 7, 11 |
Type: Supervised | |||
Work in cooperative groups | 20 | 0.8 | 1, 6, 8, 11, 12 |
group analysis of documents | 35 | 1.4 | 1, 6, 8, 11, 12 |
specialized tutoring monitoring | 10 | 0.4 | 1, 6, 8, 11, 12 |
Type: Autonomous | |||
Individual analysis of documents | 40 | 1.6 | 5, 7, 12 |
Consultation and reading the recommended bibliography | 40 | 1.6 | 5, 7, 12 |
Organization documentation | 25 | 1 | 5, 7, 12 |
Test Preparation | 20 | 0.8 | 5, 7, 12 |
a) What will be evaluated?
The degree of assimilation of the contents studied (section 7 of this guide) and of the learning outcomes (section 6 of this guide).
b) When will we evaluate?
We consider that there are three key moments in the evaluation of the subject: initial evaluation, continuous evaluation and final evaluation.
The initial evaluation should allow knowing the entry-level of the students in terms of knowledge about the subject and experiences they have in group work, autonomous work, etc., in order to be able to adapt the program to their characteristics.
c) How will we evaluate?
The evaluation instruments are specified as follows:
The results of the evaluation of each of the pieces of evidence will have to be published on the virtual campus within a maximum period of one month from its completion, and a review date will have to be offered within 10 days of its publication.
In accordance with UAB regulations, plagiarism or copying of any piece of work or written test will be penalized with a 0 as the grade of the evidence and the possibility of recovering it will be lost, whether the work is individual or group (in this last case, all the members of the group will have a 0 as grade).
Attendance at face-to-face sessions is mandatory, the student must attend a minimum of 80%. Otherwise, it will be recorded as "NOT PRESENTED" (NP).
Particular cases, doubts, suggestions, etc., will have to be raised with the professor of the corresponding module.
Students must be able to express themselves fluently and correctly and show a high degree of understanding of academic texts. An activity can be returned (not evaluated) or suspended if the teacher considers that it does not meet these requirements.
The proposed teaching methodology and evaluation may undergo some modification depending on the restrictions on attendance imposed by the health authorities.
Title | Weighting | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
Academic works: group presentation and portfolio | 45% | 0 | 0 | 4, 2, 6, 8, 12, 10 |
Attendance | 10% | 0 | 0 | 2, 6, 7, 11, 9 |
Self-evaluation | 5% | 0 | 0 | 4 |
Theoretical and practical test | 40% | 0 | 0 | 1, 2, 5, 6, 7, 8, 11, 12, 10, 13, 3, 14 |
VVAA. (2020). Covid-19: repensar a educación. Revista galega de educación. http://www.nova-escola-galega.org/almacen/documentos/NUMEROESPECIAL_RGE_COVID_XUNHO2020.pdf
Álvarez, L. (2000). La diversidad en la práctica educativa: modelos de orientación y tutoría. CCS.
Badía, A. (2006). La práctica psicopedagógica en educación no formal. UOC
Bauman, Z. (2007). Els reptes de l’educació en la modernitat líquida. Arcàdia
Benavent, J. A. (2000). La orientación psicopedagógica en España. Promolibro.
Bisquerra, R. (1998). Modelos de orientación e intervención Psicopedagógica. Praxis.
Blasco, P. & Pérez, A. (2001). Orientación e Inserción profesional. Competencias y entrenamiento para su práctica. NAU Llibres.
Bonals, J. & Sánchez-Cano, M (2007). Manual de asesoramiento psicopedagógico. Graó.
Borrego, M. & Díaz, J. (2000). Orientación vocacional y profesional: materiales de asesoramiento para ESO y Bachillerato. CCS.
Cano, E. (2005). Cómo mejorar las competencias de los docentes. Guía para la autoevaluación y el desarrollo de las competencias del profesorado. Graó (Col. Desarollo profesional del profesorado, 4)
Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea (2020). Conclusiones del Consejo sobre la lucha contra la crisis de la COVID-19 en el ámbito de la educación y la formación. (2020/C 212 I/03). http://www.infocoponline.es/pdf/Y00009-00014.pdf
Dolz, M., Camprodon, E., & Tarbal, A. (Coords.) (2021). Una mirada a la salut mental dels adolescents. Claus per compendre'ls i acompanyar-los. Quaderns Faros, 12.
Fernández, J. R. & Villamarín, S. (Eds.) (2021). Libro blanco de la Salud Mental Infanto-Juvenil. Vol. 1. Consejo General de la Psicología. https://www.cop.es/pdf/LibroBlanco-Volumen1.pdf
Fullan, M. (2002). Los nuevos significados del cambio en educación. Octaedro.
Gairín, J. (2005). La descentralización educativa: ¿una solución o un problema? Cisspraxis.
Gairín, J. (2012). Gestión del conocimiento ydesarrollo organizativo. Formación y formación corporativa. Wolters Kluwer.
Gairín, J. (Ed) (2011). El trabajo colaborativo en red. Actores y procesos en la la creación y gestión del conocimiento colectivo. Wolters Kluwer.
García, L. & Martínez, M.C (2003). Orientación educativa en la familia y en la escuela: casos resueltos. Dykinson.
Herrero, P. (2021). Guia del llenguatge inclusiu en el tractament de persones amb discapacitat. Departament de Cultura de la Generalitat de Catalunya.
Hervás, R. M. (2006). Orientación e Intervención Psicopedagógica y procesos de cambio. Grupo Editorial Universitario.
Marí-Klose, M. & Gómez-Granell, C. (Coord.) (2010). Acompanyament a l’escolaritat. Pautes per a un model local de referència. Diputació de Barcelona (Col. Estudis, sèrie Educació 2).
Monereo, C. i Pozo, J. I. (Coord) (2005). La práctica del asesoramiento educativo a examen. Graó.
Monereo, C. & Solé, I. (2001). El asesoramiento psicopedagógico: una perspectiva profesional y constructivista. Alianza.
Murillo, P. (2008). La autoevaluación institucional: un camino importante para la mejora de los centros educativos. Revista del Forum Europeo de Administradores de la Educación, 16(1), 13-17.
Nieto, J. M. & Botías, F. (2000). Los equipos de orientación educativa y psicopedagógica. Ariel.
Pedró, F. (2009). Descentralització i municipalització de l’educació als països de l’OCDE. Diputació de Barcelona (Col. Estudis, sèrie Educació 1).
Planas, J. A. (2010). Los servicios de orientación en las comunidades autónomas. Document inèdit. Máster de Intervención y asesoramiento psicopedagógico. Departament de Pedagogia Aplicada. UAB.
Prats, J. & Raventós, F. (Dir.) (2005). Els sistemes educatius europeus ¿Crisi o transformació? Obra social Fundació “La Caixa”. Col. EstudisSocials, 18.
Sanz Oro, R. (2001). Orientación psicopedagógica y calidad educativa. Pirámide.
Senlle, A. (2005): Calidad en los servicios educativos. Díaz de Santos.
Links to websites:
No software is required.