Assessment

Continuous-assessment dates will be published on Campus Virtual and on the presentation slides, specific programming may change when necessary. Any such modification will always be communicated to students through Campus Virtual, which is the usual communication platform between lecturers and students.

The evaluation of the course, out of 10 points, will be made as follows:

• Two individual partial tests, 3 points each. As part of the continuous evaluation, the first test will be given during the week of intersemesteral exams agreed by the coordination. The second partial test will be taken on the last day of the course. It is necessary to obtain at least 1.2 out of 3 points in each of the individual tests in order to pass the course.
• Deliverable of activities, 1.5 point. An activity related to some topics of the course must be submitted.
• Exercise resolution, 2.5 points. As part of the continuous evaluation, activities will have to be done or exercises will have to be solved via online questionnaires. In some cases, some other evaluation activity could be programmed and will be made known to the students through the Virtual Campus.
• Final exam, 6 points. Those who have not passed the course as a result of the individual tests will have the option of taking the final exam to recover all the subject of the course. It is necessary to obtain at least 2.4 out of 6 points to pass the course.

The following activities cannot be recovered:

• Exercise resolution.
• Presentation of activity.

Without prejudice to other disciplinary measures deemed appropriate, and in accordance with current academic regulations, the evaluation activities (practices, problems or exams) with irregularities committed by a student that may lead to a variation of the grade will be graded in full of a zero (0). The evaluation activities qualified in this way and by this procedure will not be recoverable. If it is necessary to pass any of these evaluation activities to pass the course, it will be directly suspended, without the opportunity to recover it in the same course. These irregularities include, among others

• total or partial copying of a practice, report, or any other evaluation activity;
• allowing the student to copy;
• submitting group work not done entirely by the members of the group;
• presenting as one's own materials elaborated by a third party, even if they are translations or adaptations, and in general works with elements that are not original and exclusive to the student;
• having communication devices (such as cell phones, *smart *watches, etc.) accessible during individual evaluation tests (exams).

To pass, it is necessary that the evaluation of each of the parts exceeds the minimum required and that the total evaluation exceeds 5 points. In case of not passing the course because any of the evaluation activities does not reach the minimum required grade, the numerical grade of the file will be the lower value between 4.5 and the weighted average of the grades. The grade of "not evaluable" will be given to those who do not participate in any of the evaluation activities, and the numerical grade of the transcript will be the lower value between 3.0 and the weighted average of the grades in case of irregularities in an evaluation activity (and, therefore, it will not be possible to pass by compensation). In order to obtain a *MH the final grade must be equal to or higher than 9 points. Since the number of *MH cannot exceed 5% of the number of students enrolled, they will be awarded to whoever has the highest final grades. In case of a tie, the results of the midterm exams will be taken into account.
Partial tests will be taken into account. It is important to note that no evaluation activity will be done to any student in a different schedule than the one established if there is no justified cause,priornotice has been given in the activity and the faculty has given its consent. In any other case, if the student has not attended an activity, it cannot be made up. In the case of online evaluations of questionnaires, a review may be requested after the closing date of the questionnaire. For the rest of the evaluation activities, a place, date and time of review will be indicated in which the student can review the activity with the teacher. In this context, claims on the grade of the activity may be made, which will be evaluated by the faculty responsible for the subject. If the student does not show up for this review, the activity will not be reviewed afterwards.

You can consult the UAB academic regulations approved by the UAB Governing Council: http://webs2002.uab.es/afers_academics/info_ac/0041.htm