Assessment

The dates of continuous evaluation and delivery of works will be published in the virtual campus and may be subject to possible programming changes for reasons of adaptation to possible incidents; always be informed in the virtual campus about these changes since it is understood that the CV is the usual mechanism of communication of information by the teacher. Students wishing to communicate with the teacher electronically should do so using their institutional email and directing it to the teacher's institutional email to avoid reception problems.

Evaluation criteria:

The objective of the evaluation process is to verify that the student has acquired the knowledge and skills defined in the objectives of the subject, as well as the competences.

The evaluation will be carried out based on the degree of involvement in the seminars, the scientific-technical knowledge of the subject reached by the student and the practical work developed by the students in groups of 3 people.

To make this evaluation, the following instruments are available:

- The evaluation of the student's work in the Seminars, which will include the presentation of a work.

- A series of controls carried out throughout the course, at the individual level, to assess adequately the degree of knowledge reached by the student.

- The assessment of the student's work in the laboratory, as well as the documentation submitted by the students of their practical work and the corresponding individual validation test.

Indicators and assessment:

The final grade will be obtained according to the following scale:

- 30% will come from the qualifications obtained in the seminars.

- 40% will come from the qualifications obtained in the controls. It will be necessary to have obtained a minimum score of 2 points in each control to be able to make the average corresponding to this part, and the average score of the controls must be 5 points out of a maximum of 10 to be able to make average with the final grade. Students who do not pass the evaluation of the controls, must do a re-evaluation test. After each control, a date will be set to carry out the review. This date will be announced on the Virtual Campus when the marks are published.

- 30% of the final grade will come from the practicum. This note will summarize the grades obtained by the student in (1) the work done in the laboratory, (2) the documents submitted and (3) any tests to defend the work to which they have been summoned. Attendance at ALL laboratory sessions is mandatory. In case of not being able to attend two laboratory sessions, the practices will be automatically suspended. In order to average with the other parts of the subject it will be necessary to have 5 points out of a maximum of 10, in the practicum. The work of practices carried out in the laboratory sessions DOES NOT HAVE REVALUATION. The internship will be structured in three levels: Basic, Intermediate and Advanced:

- The basic level gives option to a score between 0 and 6 points, if it is delivered in the first 3 sessions. If delivered in the fourth or fifth session it can reach 5.5 and if delivered in the last session a 5.

- The middle level allows you to add a point to the basic level qualification, if it is delivered in the two sessions following the delivery of the basic level, and half if it is delivered from the third session after having delivered the basic level.

- The advanced level gives the option to add a point to the score obtained after delivering the intermediate level if it is delivered in the two sessions following the delivery of the mid and midpoint level from the third session.

A level cannot be presented if the previous level has not been presented to the teacher and you have been approved. Only one level can be presented in one session. In order to pass the internship, it is a necessary condition to achieve a minimum score of 5 points in the laboratory sessions. The qualification obtained in the laboratory is individual, and will depend on the attendance and work carried out during the practice sessions, the answers by each member of the team to the questions that the teacher in charge of the shift may ask. There is a test for individual validation of practices at the time established by the coordination. This test will be scored between 0.75 and 1.25 and will be a multiplier factor of the laboratory grade.

- It is considered that a student has submitted to the subject when he has made a seminar delivery and has attended a control.

- To pass the subject it will be necessary to have obtained a minimum score of 5 in each of the parts (practicum and controls).

- There will be an overall evaluation of the theory part (controls) at the end of the semester for those students who have passed the practicum, but not the controls. Whenever the grade of this global evaluation is greater than 5 points, the final grade will be calculated by making the corresponding average with the practicum grade.

- In case of not passing the subject for not reaching the minimum score in any of the sections, although when averaging the final grade is equal to or higher than 5 the note that will be placed in the file will be 4, 5. If the average does not reach 5 the note that will appear in the file will be the average grade obtained numerically.

Both in regard to the controls and the overall evaluation, no students will be allowed to enter after 5 minutes from the start of the test. Mobile phones can not be used in the evaluation tests.

All mid-course controls will be carried out during the afternoon shift schedule (if the pandemic situation allows it).

The repeating students are evaluated in the same way as the newly enrolled students, without any difference, nor keeping any notes of the previous course.

To qualify for the honor qualification, it is a necessary condition to have obtained a final grade of the subject of more than 9 points. On the other hand, only a maximumnumber of license plates equal to 5% of the number of enrolled alumens can be assigned.

For each evaluation activity, a place, date and time of revision in which the student can review the activity with the teacher will be indicated. In this context, claims may be made on the activity grade, which will be evaluated by the faculty responsible for the subject. If the student does not appear in this review, this activity will not be reviewed later.

Without prejudice to other disciplinary measures deemed appropriate, and in accordance with the current academic regulations, irregularities committed by a student that could lead to a variation of the grade will be scored with a zero (0). For example, plagiarizing, copying, letting copy, ..., an evaluation activity, will imply suspending this evaluation activity with a zero (0). The evaluation activities qualified in this way and by this procedure will not be recoverable. If it is necessary to pass any of these evaluation activities to pass the subject, this subject will be suspended directly, without the opportunity to recover it in the same course.