Assessment

60% of the evaluation is made from the delivery of three projects prepared in groups of 3/4 people.

    a) Creation of a Web page with eCommerce (20%)

    b) Development of an email marketing campaign (20%)

    c) Designing a dashboard with Tableau (20%)

Attendance will be calculated for each project, as follows: Present = 2 points, Delay or Excused absence = 1, Unexcused absence = 0 points.
										
											
										
											      - The student who does not exceed 80% attendance in a certain project, will lose 50% of the grade obtained by his group in that project.
										
											
										
											      - The student who does not exceed 70% attendance in a certain project, will lose 100% of the grade obtained by his group in that project.

Another 40% corresponds to the individual evaluation based on tests and exercises performed individually in the classes.

To calculate the grade for the subject, it is essential to obtain an average grade greater than or equal to 5 in all the individual tests. 
If in the set of individual tests an average between 3.5 and 4.9 is obtained, the student will be able to take the recovery exam to pass the subject, 
if his overall average mark is greater than or equal to 3.5.

A student is considered to be "Not evaluable" in the subject when informing the teacher that he/she leaves the subject before week 7 of the course.

Calendar of evaluation activities

The dates of the different evaluation tests (partial exams, exercises in the classroom, delivery of works, ...) will be announced in the virtual campus at the beginning of the course and will be done within the weeks of teaching. In this sense, it will be necessary to use the class on Tuesday 19-5-20 to compensate for thehours scheduled for the final exam. There is no final exam on the subject.

"The dates of evaluation activities cannot be modified unless there is an exceptional and duly justified reason why an evaluation activity cannot be carried out. In this case, the degree coordinator will contact both the teaching staff and the affected student, and a new datewill be scheduled within the same academic period to make up for the missed evaluation activity." Section 1 of Article 115. Calendar of evaluation activities (Academic Regulations UAB). Students of the Faculty of Economics and Business, who in accordance with the previous paragraph need to change an evaluation activity date must process the request by filling out an Application for exams' reschedule https://eformularis.uab.cat/group/deganat_feie/application-for-exams-reschedule

Grade revision process

In the virtual campus will be informed of the procedure, place, date and time of the review of exams in accordance with the regulations of the University.

Retake Process

"To be eligible to participate in the retake process, it is required for students to have been previously been evaluated for at least two-thirds of the total evaluation activities of the subject." Section 3 of Article 112 ter. The recovery (UAB Academic Regulations). Additionally, it is required that the student to have achieved an average grade of the subject between 3.5 and 4.9.

The date of the retake exam will be posted in the calendar of evaluation activities of the Faculty. Students who take this exam and pass will get a grade of 5 forthesubject. If the student does not pass the retake, the grade will remain unchanged, and hence, the student will fail the course.

Irregularities in evaluation activities

In spite of other disciplinary measures deemed appropriate, and in accordance with current academic regulations, "in the case that the student makes any irregularity that could lead to a significant variation in the grade of an evaluation activity, it will be graded with a 0, regardless of the disciplinary process that can be instructed. In case of various irregularities occur in the evaluation of the same subject, the final grade of this subject will be 0". Section 10 of Article 116. Results of the evaluation. (UAB Academic Regulations).

In this sense, any delivery that is identified plagiarized by other colleagues or any other source entails a zero in that evaluation. In case of plagiarism between classmates, the zero will be as much for the plagiarist as for the one that facilitates the plagiarism.