Logo UAB
2022/2023

Field Studies in Social and Cultural Anthropology II

Code: 101262 ECTS Credits: 6
Degree Type Year Semester
2500256 Social and Cultural Anthropology OB 3 2

Contact

Name:
Beatriz Ballestin Gonzalez
Email:
beatriz.ballestin@uab.cat

Use of Languages

Principal working language:
catalan (cat)
Some groups entirely in English:
No
Some groups entirely in Catalan:
Yes
Some groups entirely in Spanish:
Yes

Teachers

Sílvia Gomez Mestres
Isabel Graupera Gargallo

External teachers

Per determinar

Prerequisites

Field practices in social and cultural anthropology II

In accordance with the 2009 Curriculum, approved by the Ministry, students must take the following subjects in the established order: Second year, first semester, Field Practices in Social and Cultural Anthropology I; second semester, Epistemology and Methods of Research in Social and Cultural Anthropology; third year, first semester, Research Techniques in Social and Cultural Anthropology; second semester, Field Practices in Social and Cultural Anthropology II.

Objectives and Contextualisation

Objectives

The subject Field Practices in Social and Cultural Anthropology II - hereinafter Field II -, is the fourth of a four-itinerary that is developed throughout two years of studies - second and third years of the Bachelor. This itinerary ends with the Final Project (TFG), in the fourth year.

The objectives of the course are:

- Acquire and complete, through the continuation of a prospective fieldwork initiated in Field I, a direct knowledge of the advantages, potentialities, limitations and risks of classical fieldwork in ethnography.

- Learn how to design tools for collecting information and the use of the various techniques that must be applied and which constitute field work.

 - To collect through these techniques the information necessary for the testing of a hypothesis developed methodologically and technically throughout the sequence. This information will be analyzed in the Final Project.

Competences

  • Act with ethical responsibility and respect for fundamental rights and duties, diversity and democratic values.
  • Producing cultural diversity materials that could have a critical impact on the common sense conceptions.
  • Students must be capable of collecting and interpreting relevant data (usually within their area of study) in order to make statements that reflect social, scientific or ethical relevant issues.
  • Students must be capable of communicating information, ideas, problems and solutions to both specialised and non-specialised audiences.
  • Students must develop the necessary learning skills to undertake further training with a high degree of autonomy.
  • Take sex- or gender-based inequalities into consideration when operating within one's own area of knowledge.
  • Use digital tools and critically interpret specific documentary sources.
  • Using the procedures, techniques and instrumental resources to the fulfilment of ethnographic fieldwork.

Learning Outcomes

  1. Ability to maintain an appropriate conversation.
  2. Adopting a holistic perspective to the research problem's statement and analysing human institutions within wider cultural configurations.
  3. Analysing a contemporary fact from an anthropological perspective.
  4. Analysing data critically from anthropological investigations and reports.
  5. Applying the current ethical codes to the ethnographic fieldwork.
  6. Carry out ethical use of the information especially when it is of a personal nature.
  7. Carrying out an individual work that specifies the work plan and timing of activities.
  8. Critically analyse the principles, values and procedures that govern the exercise of the profession.
  9. Establishing reliable ethnological relationships with subjects that encourage the production and trustworthiness of data.
  10. Explain the explicit or implicit code of practice of one's own area of knowledge.
  11. Explaining the work's results narratively in accordance with the critical standards of discipline and bearing in mind the different target audiences.
  12. Obtaining and recording ethnographic data by applying the different collection and analysis techniques, specially by using qualitative procedures and the practice of the participant observation.
  13. Operationalizing theoretical concepts and testing explanations of the sociocultural phenomena.
  14. Propose projects and actions that incorporate the gender perspective.
  15. Selecting the appropriate techniques for each research design.
  16. Solving problems autonomously.
  17. Using suitable terminology when drawing up an academic text.

Content

Contents

The objectives of the course will be gradually achieved with the successive elaboration of the data collection tools of each technique used, following the technical design of the research, and the application of these. In the end, you will have a clear awareness of what has been done, to a large extent, thanks to the reflection work that is required to evaluate the subject.

The following aspects will be worked:

  • Participant observation (access, ethnological relation, ethical and methodological issues) and Elaboration of the field diary.
  •  Design and application of Qualitative interviews. Preparation of the instruments for collecting data from the operationalization carried out and the review of them (several versions).
  • Application of other techniques (such as focus groups) if its necessary, and critical analysis of the application of all techniques and the results obtained.
  • Articulation of the techniques and joint assessment of the information obtained and first systematization of the collected information.
  • Elaboration of a research report following a guide provided

Methodology

This subject is evaluated continuously and with the permanent supervision of teachers. Students must have solved all the fieldwork planned for the development of the subject, to have the right to present the final work and be evaluated. The teaching methodology and assessment proposed in the guide may be subject to some modifications depending on the restrictions on attendance imposed by the health authorities.

 

 

Annotation: Within the schedule set by the centre or degree programme, 15 minutes of one class will be reserved for students to evaluate their lecturers and their courses or modules through questionnaires.

Activities

Title Hours ECTS Learning Outcomes
Type: Directed      
Type: Directed 0 0
Type: Supervised      
Type: Supervised 34 1.36 3, 2, 7, 9, 17, 13, 15
Type: Autonomous      
Type: Autonomous 66 2.64 5, 9, 11, 1, 12, 16

Assessment

 
This subject is evaluated continuously and with the permanent supervision of the teaching staff during the mandatory face-to-face tutorials (6). The lack of three of these tutorials will be considered "not evaluable". The tutorials cannot be recoverable. Mandatory supervision sessions (10%) and the individual work process (10%) will be evaluated; with the delivery of all the results demanded in the 6 tutorials (50%) and the final report (30%): Total 100%.

In the event of a student committing any irregularity that may lead to a significant variation in the grade awarded to an assessment activity, the student will be given a zero for this activity, regardless of any disciplinary process that may take place. In the event of several irregularities in assessment activities of the same subject, the student will be given a zero as the final grade for this subject.

In the event that tests or exams cannot be taken onsite, they will be adapted to an online format made available through the UAB’s virtual tools (original weighting will be maintained). Homework, activities and class participation will be carried out through forums, wikis and/or discussion on Teams, etc. Lecturers will ensure that students are able to access these virtual tools, or will offer them feasible alternatives.

In the event of a student committing any irregularity that may lead to a significant variation in the grade awarded to an assessment activity, the student will be given a zero for this activity, regardless of any disciplinary process that may take place. In the event of several irregularities in assessment activities of the same subject, the student will be given a zero as the final grade for this subject.

 

Assessment Activities

Title Weighting Hours ECTS Learning Outcomes
Final work: elaboration of the ethnographic report with the data, collected in the fieldwork 30% 15 0.6 8, 4, 3, 5, 2, 7, 9, 11, 17, 6, 1, 12, 13, 16, 15
Supervision and work process sessions. 50% 25 1 4, 3, 5, 2, 7, 9, 11, 17, 1, 12, 13, 16, 15
Mandatory supervision sessions and the individual work process. 20% 10 0.4 8, 4, 5, 9, 10, 6, 12, 13, 14, 15

Bibliography

Angell RC, Freedman R. (1992 [1953]) El uso de documentos, registros, materiales censales. En: Festinger L, Katz D., comps. (1992 [1953]) Los métodos de investigación en las ciencias sociales. Barcelona, Paidós, 286-309.

Ardèvol E, et al. (2003) Etnografía virtualizada: la observación participante y la entrevista semiestructurada en línea. [En línea] Athenea Digital, 3, primavera de 2003. Página web de la revista <http://antalya.uab.es/athenea/num3/ardevol.pdf>. [Consulta, 5 de mayo de 2004].

Ballestín, B.; Fàbregues, S. (2018) La práctica de la investigación cualitativa en ciencias sociales y de la educación. Barcelona, Editorial UOC.

Barnes JA. (2003 [1954]) Clase y comités en una comunidad isleña noruega. En: Requena F., ed. (2003) Análisis de redes sociales. Orígenes, teorías y aplicaciones. Madrid, CIS, 121-146.

Bertaux D. (1993 [1980]) La perspectiva biográfica: validez metodológica y potencialidades. En: Marinas JM, Santamarina C., eds. (1993) La historia oral: métodos y experiencias. Madrid, Debate, 149-171.

Blanchet A. (1989 [1987]) Entrevistar. En: Blanchet A, et al. Técnicas de investigación en ciencias sociales. Madrid, Narcea, 87-129.

Bott E. (1990 [1971]) Factores que influyen en las redes sociales y relaciones con los parientes. En: Familia y red social. Madrid, Taurus, 137-201.

Bourdieu P. (1989 [1986]) La ilusión biográfica. Historia y Fuente Oral, 2, 2, 27-33.

Canales M, PeinadoA. (1994) Grupos de discusión. En: Delgado JM, Gutiérrez J., coords. (1994) Métodos y técnicas cualitativasde investigación en ciencias sociales. Madrid, Síntesis, 287-316.

Cardoso CFS, Pérez H. (1999 [1976]) Los métodos de la historia. Barcelona, Crítica, 132-167.

Cardús S, Estruch J. (1984) Crítica metodològica. En: Les enquestes a la Joventut de Catalunya. Barcelona, Generalitat de Catalunya, 73-159.

Cea D’Ancona MA. (1996) La investigación social mediante encuesta. En: Metodología cuantitativa. Estrategias y técnicas de investigación social. Madrid, Síntesis, 239-291.

Cea D’Ancona MA. (1996) La operacionalización de conceptos. En: Metodología cuantitativa. Estrategias y técnicas de investigación social. Madrid, Síntesis, 123-157.

Denzin NK. (1970) Participant Observation: Varieties and Strategies of the Field Method. En: The research act. Chicago, Aldine, 185-218.

Feixa C. (2000) La imaginació autobiogràfica. L'Avenç, 252, 16-27.

García M. (1984 [1982]) Aspectos generales del muestreo en la investigación sociológica. En: Introducción a la estadística en sociología. Socioestadística. Madrid, CIS, 132-151.

Ghiglione R. (1989 [1987]) Encuestar. En: Blanchet A, et al. Técnicas de investigación en ciencias sociales. Madrid, Narcea, 131-182.

Hammer D, Wildavsky A. (1990) La entrevista semi-estructurada de final abierto. Aproximación auna guía operativa. Historia y Fuente Oral, 4, 23-61.

Hammersley M, Atkinson P. (1994a [1983]) Los relatos nativos: escuchar y preguntar. En: Etnografía. Métodos de investigación. Barcelona, Paidós, 121-142.

Hammersley M, Atkinson P. (1994b [1983]) Relaciones de campo. En: Etnografía. Métodos de investigación. Barcelona, Paidós, 93-120.

Heider KG. (1988) The Rashomon Effect: When Etnographers Disagree. American Anthropologist, 90, 1, 73-81.

Krueger RA. (1991 [1988]) El grupo de discusión. Guía práctica para la investigación aplicada. Madrid, Pirámide.

Molina JL. (2005) El estudio de las redes personales: contribuciones, métodos y perspectivas. Empiria, 10, julio-diciembre, 71-106.

Patton MQ. (2001 [1990] Purposeful Sampling. En: Bryman A., ed. (2001) Ethnography. Vol. II: Ethnographic Fieldwork Practice. London, Sage, 106-121.

Requena F. (1991) Análisis de redes. En: Redes sociales y mercado de trabajo. Madrid, CIS, 34-49.

Roigé X, Estrada F, Bertrán O. (1999a) El treball amb documentació. En: Tècniques d’investigació en antropologia social. Barcelona, Publicacions de la Universitat de Barcelona, col. Textos docents 153, 197-215.

Roigé X, Estrada F, Bertrán O. (1999b) El treball bibliogràfic. En: Tècniques d’investigació en antropologia social. Barcelona, Publicacions de la Universitat de Barcelona, col. Textos docents 153, 69-71.

Sánchez JJ. (1996) La calidad dela encuesta. Papers. Revista de Sociologia, 48, 127-146.

Santamarina C, Marinas JM. (1994) Historias de vida e historia oral. En: DelgadoJM, Gutiérrez J., coords. Métodos y técnicas cualitativas de investigación en ciencias sociales. Madrid, Síntesis, 259-285.

Spradley JP. (1980) Doing Participant Observation. En: Participant Observation. New York, Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 53-62.

Spreen M. (1992) Rare populations, hidden populations and link-tracing designs: what and why? Bulletin de Methodologie Sociologique, 36, 34-58.

Szczepanski J. (1978) El método biográfico. Papers: Revista de Sociologia, 10, 231-259.

Trognon A. (1989 [1987]) Producir datos. En: Blanchet A, et al. Técnicas de investigación en ciencias sociales. Madrid, Narcea, 11-26.

Valles MS. (1997a) La investigación documental: técnicas de lectura y documentación. En: Técnicas cualitativas de investigación social. Reflexión metodológica y práctica profesional. Madrid, Síntesis, 109-139.

Valles MS. (1997b) Técnicas de conversación, narración (I): las entrevistas en profundidad. En: Técnicas cualitativas de investigación social. Reflexión metodológica y práctica profesional. Madrid, Síntesis, 177-234.

Valles MS. (1997c) Técnicas de conversación, narración (III): los grupos de discusión y otras técnicas afines. En: Técnicas cualitativas de investigación social. Reflexión metodológica y práctica profesional. Madrid, Síntesis, 279-335.

Whyte WF. (1971 [1943]) Entrenamiento de observación participante. A: La sociedad de las esquinas. México, Diana, 359-369. 

Software

Word processor (Word type).