Degree | Type | Year | Semester |
---|---|---|---|
2502443 Psychology | OB | 3 | 1 |
This subject does not require previous knowledge of other subjects, but it is an important requirement for future subjects on the course, especially for those that belong to the educational and social area. It is the basis for following other subjects in the curriculum of the Psychology degree at the UAB, which has an important educational component. It is also important for taking fourth-year subjects and it is essential for the Analysis and Psychoeducational Intervention specialisation.
Objectives
- To know the scope of Educational Psychology and its position within Psychology.
- To know the variables and interactions that characterize Educational Psychology, differentiating them from other theoretical approaches of a psychological and/or educational nature.
- To learn procedures for analysing practical situations from the psychoeducational perspective.
- To learn, examine, analyse and critically evaluate relevant literature and to participate in discussions (both in small and large groups), on topics related to the content of the subject.
- To actively and critically participate in the construction of self-learning and to acquire autonomous and independent intellectual work habits.
- To acquire declarative and procedural knowledge in order to be able to work as an educational psychologist in formal or non-formal education.
Content
Theme 1: The Psychology of education and its context.
1.1. Psychoeducative variables
Theme 2: Student’s resources and emotional aspects
2.1. Intellectual diversity: multiple intelligences.
2.1.1. Intelligence concept.
2.1.2. Gifted and talented subjects.
2.1.3. Educational intervention strategies.
Theme 3: The SEN of students and their intervention by educational psychologists
3.1. The SEN.
3.2. Different types of SEN.
Theme 4. Classroom management
4.1. Teaching staff and teaching task.
4.2. Discipline in the classroom.
4.3. Forms of intervention on disruptive behaviors.
Theme 5: Learning and building knowledge.
5.1. The constructivist conception of teaching and learning.
5.2. Transforming information into knowledge.
Theme 6: Identification of psychoeducational variables.
6.1. Psychoeducational interviews.
6.2. Psychoeducational questionnaires.
6.3. Personal and academic background.
Theme 7: Educational variables.
7.1. Education system.
7.2. Declarative and procedural content.
7.3. Instructional methodology by reception and discovery.
Theme 8: Psychological variables.
8.1. Learning during adolescence.
8.2. Learning patterns.
8.3. Cheating or dishonest behavior in the classroom.
8.4. Academic procrastination.
8.5 Academic stress
8.6. Problem solving in academia.
Teaching is done through lectures and practicals in the classroom. The lectures will be used to introduce and explain the main themes of the syllabus. In the first session, the syllabus will be presented, basic and complementary bibliography will be given and a presentation of work proposals will be made.
The practical classes will consist of two different parts: one led by the teachers and the other by the students. They will include student presentations followed by discussion, in which the other students will be invited to participate actively, and activities based on videos, reviews of some readings, critical analysis of cases and experiential workshops.
Through tutorials, students will have continuous support from the teachers for writing reports and other coursework. All doubts and discussions that may arise from the recommended readings and the lectures will be addressed.
All the above activities can serve for evaluation purposes.
The students' self-directed activities include reading specialized or complementary materials of special interest for the acquisition of the competences specific to the subject, preparing questions for the practical sessions, and individual or group study to build up competences in the subject area. Some of the readings will be posted on the Campus Virtual and a Genially (this will be specified on the first day of class).
It is very important to keep in mind that this course will work with the Campus Virtual, a tool that is very useful for accurately monitoring the course and what is being done or needs to be done, and for giving access to preparatory materials and complementary readings.
N.B. The proposed teaching and assessment methodologies may experience some modifications as a result of the restrictions on face-to-face learning imposed by the health authorities. The teaching staff will use the Moodle classroom or the usual communication channel to specify whether the different directed and assessmentactivities are to be carried out on site or online, as instructed by the Faculty.
Annotation: Within the schedule set by the centre or degree programme, 15 minutes of one class will be reserved for students to evaluate their lecturers and their courses or modules through questionnaires.
Title | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|
Type: Directed | |||
Classroom practices | 32 | 1.28 | 1, 4, 3, 5, 7, 8, 10, 11, 14, 15, 24, 21, 20 |
Master classes | 22.5 | 0.9 | 1, 2, 9, 10, 13, 12, 14, 15, 23, 21, 20 |
Type: Supervised | |||
Group Query Sessions | 5 | 0.2 | 1, 2, 10, 12, 14, 26, 23 |
Tutorials scheduled | 4.5 | 0.18 | 1, 2, 4, 9, 13, 14, 15, 26, 20 |
Type: Autonomous | |||
Check virtual campus | 23 | 0.92 | 26, 20 |
Elaborate documents | 33 | 1.32 | 2, 4, 5, 7, 8, 10, 13, 12, 14, 15, 25, 22, 23, 24, 21 |
Reading of texts | 33 | 1.32 | 1, 2, 12, 15, 21 |
Search for information | 34 | 1.36 | 4, 15, 20 |
Study activities | 36 | 1.44 | 2, 6, 13, 12, 15, 26, 23 |
Evaluation
Evaluation is ongoing and consists of four evidences which, at the same time, are also learning activities.
All the students must participate in the activities of continuous assessment.
The final mark is the sum of the evidences.
To pass the course it is mandatory to take all three evidence.Students must obtain a mark equal to or greater than 5 out of 10, as long as the student has obtained a minimum of 4 in each of the evidences. In the event of not meeting these requirements, the maximum grade to be recorded in the academic record will be 4.5 points. It will be considered "Fail" if the person obtains a final grade less than 5.
A student who has submitted evidence of learning (all of them or one) with a weight equal to or greater than 40% will be listed as "assessable".
Criteria for allowing re-evaluation
a) Not having passed the continuous assessment (the purpose of re-evaluation is not to improve on a passing grade once the subject has been passed in the continuous evaluation).
b) The student has submitted at least 2 continuous-evaluation evidences. EV3 and one of the other two
The re-evaluation will be to consist of a synthesis test. The mark of this test will constitute the final mark of the subject.
The corresponding guidelines on assessment can be found on this link: https://www.uab.cat/web/estudiar/graus/graus/avaluacions-1345722525858.html
Students of second enrollment or later may choose, before the date specified at the beginning of the course, to follow the continuous assessment or perform a single synthesis test without the possibility of recovery, which will consist of a test with questions especiallythe content of the subject.
Title | Weighting | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
EV1. Group activity (written format) about diversity in the classroom. Between weeks 6-7 and weeks 14 and 15 depending on the groups. Virtual. Will be detailed in class. Students will be informed 15 days before. | 30% | 0 | 0 | 1, 4, 5, 7, 19, 17, 18, 12, 14, 15, 25, 22, 23, 24, 21 |
EV2. Psychoeducational Reports. Written format. Individual activity.The activity is divided into two parts, one is at class and the other will be virtual. Between weeks 6-7 and weeks 14 and 15 depending on the groups.Will be detailed in class | 30% | 0 | 0 | 1, 2, 4, 3, 6, 8, 9, 11, 19, 17, 18, 14, 25, 22, 23, 21 |
EV3. Evidence on reading articles and class notes, and on videos and / or case studies. Written format. Individual activity at class. Second assessment period. Will be detailed in class | 40% | 2 | 0.08 | 1, 2, 4, 16, 7, 10, 18, 13, 12, 14, 15, 26, 23, 24, 20 |
ESSENTIAL
-Amador, J.A; Mena, Beatriz; Salat, Laia; Krieger, Virginia ( 2021). -L´alumnat amd déficits i trastorns de l´atenció. FUOC.
-Arvilla, Arnulfo Rafael; Palacio, Lina Paola; Arango, Claudia Patricia (2011). El psicólogo educativo y su quehacer en la institución educativa. Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud. Duazary, 8(2)
-Atalaya Laureano, C., & García Ampudia, L. (2019). Procrastinación: Revisión teòrica. Revista de Investigación en Psicología, 22(2), 363-378. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15381/rinvp.v22i2.17435
-Bisquerra, Rafael; Pérez, Núria ( 2007). Las competencias emocionales. Educación XXI. 10, 2007, pp. 61-82.
-Campos, Francesc ( 1995). El rol del psicólogo de la educación. Papeles del psicólogo, nº63.
-Castelló, Antoni (1995). Estrategias de enriquecimiento del currículum para alumnos y alumnas superdotados.Aula de innovación educativa, 45.
-Clariana, Mercè. (2000) Ensenyar i apendre. Bellaterra: Serveis de Publicacions de la UAB.
-Clariana, M. (2003). Informe psicopedagògic. Bellaterra: UAB, Servei de Publicacions, Materials 124.
-Clariana, M. (2009). Procrastinació acadèmica. Bellaterra: UAB, Servei de Publicacions, Materials 210.
-Comes, Gabriel; Díaz, Elena; Luque, Antonio; Moliner, Odet (2008). La evaluación psicopedagógica del alumnado con altas capacidades intelectuales. Revista Educación Incluisiva, nº1.
-Echeita, Gerardo; Ainscow, Mel ( 2011). La educación inclusiva como derecho. Marco de referencia y pautas de acción para el desarrollo de una revolución pendiente. Tejueo nº12, pp 26-46.
-García-Ravidá, L. (2017). Patrones de aprendizaje en universitarios Latinoamericanos: Dimensión cultural e implicaciones educativas. Capítulo II: Patrones de aprendizaje.Tesis Doctoral, UAB.
-Gómez C, CA., Ortiz, N. & Perdomo, L. (2106). Procrastinación y factores relacionados en la educación superior. I+D Revista de Investigaciones, 7(1), 32-39.
-Nadal, Blanca (2015). Las inteligencias múltiples como una estrategia didáctica para atender a la diversidad y aprovechar el potencial de todos los alumnos. Revista de Educación Inclusiva, Vol.8 Nº 3, págs. 121-136
-Simó, David; Raja, Pilar; Astasio,Sheila (2021). L´alumnat amb conductes problemàtiques. FUOC.
RECOMMENDED
-Badia, Mar; Clariana, Mercè; Gotzens, Concepció; Cladellas, Ramos, Dezcallar, Teresa. (2015). Video games, television and academiz performance in elementary school student. Píxel-Bit. Revista de Medios y Educación. Nº 46.
-Castelló, Antoni. y Genovard, Càndid. (1990). El límite superior. Aspectos psicopedagógicos de la excepcionalidad intelectual. Madrid: Pirámide.
-Coll, Cèsar.; Palacios, Jesus y Marchesi, Àlvaro (Eds) (2001). Desarrollo Psicológico y Educación. 2. Psicología de la Educación Escolar. Alianza Editorial.
-Genovard, Càndid.y Gotzens Concepció. (1990). Psicología de la Instrucción. Madrid. Santillana, Aula XXI 49.
-González-Herrero López, M.Elena; López Martínez, Olivia; Prieto Sánchez, M.Dolores. Psicología de la Educación. 2003. Eds. ICE -Universidad de Murcia.
-Good, Thomas.L. y Brophy, Jere.E. (1982). Psicología Educacional. Mèxic: Interamericana.
-Pintrich, Paul. R. y Schunk, Dale. H. (2006). Motivación en contextos educativos. Teoría, investigación y aplicaciones. Madrid: Pearson. Prentice Hall.
-Pontecorvo, Clotilde. (2003). Manual de psicología de la educación Editorial Popular.
-Sampascual, Maicas,G. (2007). Psicología de la Educación. Tomos I Y II. Madrid: UNED.
-Sternberg, Robert, J y Williams, Wendy W. (2002). Educational Psychology. Boston [etc.] Allyn and Bacon cop.
-Trianes, M.Victoria. y Gallardo, J.Antonio. (Coord.) (2004). Psicología de la educación y del desarrollo en contextos escolares. Madrid: Pirámide.
-Woolfolk, Anita. (2006). Psicología Educativa. Pearson Education. México.
No applicable