Degree | Type | Year | Semester |
---|---|---|---|
2500245 English Studies | OT | 3 | 0 |
2500245 English Studies | OT | 4 | 0 |
Students should have passed Use of English 1 and 2 to register for the course.
The course requires an initial level of English of C2-Proficiency of the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment. With C2, students can understand almost everything they read or hear without effort; they can summarise information from different oral and written sources, reconstruct facts and arguments and present them in a coherent way; they can express themselves spontaneously, with fluency and precision, distinguishing subtle nuances of meaning even in the most complex situations.
This basically practical subject applies theories of Second Language Acquisition to the learning and teaching of foreign languages. It focuses on the knowledge and teaching techniques that an English language teacher needs to know. This applies to both general English teaching and teaching in more specific contexts. This subject complements another two courses called English LAnguage Acquisition and Individual Learning Factors.
By the end of the course students will:
- understand and critically analyse different teaching methododologies and theories of instructed second language acquisition.
- have mastered a set of teaching techniques
- be equipped to design teaching materials relevant to the four skills
- be able to critically evaluate published material.
Instructed Second Language Acquisition (implicit and explicit knowledge, focus on form and focus on meaning)
Language teaching methodologies.
CLIL (Content and Language Integrated Learning)
The learner: young learners, adults, primary and secondary learners. Individual differences in foreign language learning.
The teacher
Material design and lesson planning.
The following teaching methods will be used:
Guided activities (Theoretical and practical sessions)
- Lectures with ICT support and class discussion.
- Practical exercises.
Supervised activities (tutorial sessions and oral presentations)
- Tutorial sessions to provide feedback on course assignments.
- Teaching unit preparation and presentation (microteaching).
Autonomous activities (Read and study time, online activities and course assignments)
- Reading selected bibliography.
- Individual and groups assignments and projects.
Annotation: Within the schedule set by the centre or degree programme, 15 minutes of one class will be reserved for students to evaluate their lecturers and their courses or modules through questionnaires.
Title | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|
Type: Directed | |||
Lectures with ICT support | 25 | 1 | 16 |
Practical exercises and class discussions | 25 | 1 | 16, 3, 4, 2, 21, 20, 9, 22 |
Type: Supervised | |||
Teaching unit preparation and presentation (microteaching) | 15 | 0.6 | 3, 21, 9, 22 |
Tutorial sessions | 10 | 0.4 | 20, 22 |
Type: Autonomous | |||
Read and study time, course assignments | 50 | 2 | 16, 3, 4, 2, 21, 20, 9, 15, 22 |
Assignment 1 (Critical review): 15%
Assignment 2 (Classroom observation): 15%
Lesson planning and microteaching: 35%
Final exam: 35%
Students will obtain a Not assessed/Not submitted course grade unless they have submitted more than 40% of the assessment items.
The level of English (C2) will be taken into account in the correction of written work and in the final evaluation.
Procedure for reviewing grades awarded
On carrying out each evaluation activity, lecturers will inform students (on Moodle) of the procedures to be followed for reviewing all grades awarded, and the date on which such a review will take place.
Reassessment
Only those students who have handed in all assessment activities, have obtained a final mark higher than 3,5 and have passed 50% of the course will be elligible for reassessment. The teacher will determine which items need to be reassessed. Students are not allowed to sit reassessment to improve their marks.
The maximum mark a student can obtain in reassessment is a 5.
Please note:
VERY IMPORTANT: Total or partial plagiarism of any of the exercises will automatically be considered "fail" (0) for the whole course, not only for the plagiarized item. Plagiarism is copying one or more sentences from unidentified sources, presenting it as original work (THIS INCLUDES COPYING PHRASES OR FRAGMENTS FROM THE INTERNET AND ADDING THEM WITHOUT MODIFICATION TO A TEXT WHICH IS PRESENTED AS ORIGINAL). Plagiarism is a serious offense. Students must learn to respect the intellectual property of others, identifying any source they may use, and take responsibility for the originality and authenticity of the texts they produce.<spanstyle="font-size: small;">
In the event of a student committing any irregularity that may lead to a significant variation in the grade awarded to an assessment activity, the student will be given a zero forthis activity, regardless of any disciplinary process that may take place. In the event of several irregularities in assessment activities of the same subject, the student will be given a zero as the final grade for this subject.
In the event that tests or exams cannot be taken onsite, they will be adapted to an online format made available through the UAB’s virtual tools (original weighting will be maintained). Homework, activities and class participation will be carried out through forums, wikis and/or discussion on Teams, etc. Lecturers will ensure that students are able to access these virtual tools, or will offer them feasible alternatives.
Title | Weighting | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
Assignment 1: Critical review | 15% | 5 | 0.2 | 16, 19, 3, 4, 5, 2, 1, 21, 20, 12, 7, 8, 9, 10, 6, 15, 17, 22 |
Assignment 2: Classroom observation | 15% | 5 | 0.2 | 16, 19, 3, 4, 5, 2, 1, 21, 20, 12, 7, 8, 9, 10, 6, 15, 17, 22 |
Final exam | 35% | 2 | 0.08 | 16, 19, 3, 4, 5, 2, 1, 21, 20, 12, 7, 8, 9, 10, 6, 15, 17, 18, 22 |
Lesson planning and presentation (microteaching) | 35% | 13 | 0.52 | 16, 19, 3, 4, 5, 2, 1, 21, 20, 12, 7, 8, 9, 10, 6, 11, 15, 13, 14, 17, 22 |
Benati, Alessando (2013). Issues in Second Language Teaching. Sheffield: Equinox Publishing Ltd.
Celce-Murcia, Marianne (2001). Teaching English as a second or foreign language (3rd edition) Heinle & Heinle.
De Graaf, Rick and Alex Housen (2009). Investigating the Effects and Effectiveness of L2 Instruction. In M. H. Long and C. Doughty (eds.) The Handbook of Language Teaching (pp. 726-755). Oxford: Blackwell.
Ellis, Rod (1999). Learning a Second Language Through Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Ellis, Rod (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ellis, Rod (2008). Principles of Instructed second language acquisition. CAL Digest, available at http://www.cal.org/resources/digest/instructed2ndlang.html
Ellis, Rod (2009). Task-based language teaching: sorting out the misunderstandings. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 19(3), 221-246.
Harmer, Jeremy (2007). The practice of English language teaching (4th ed.). Harlow, UK: Pearson Education.
Harmer, Jeremy (2007). How to Teach English. New Edition. Harlow: Pearson Education.
Hedge, Tricia (2000). Teaching and Learning in the Language Classroom. Oxford:Oxford University Press
Hughes, Glyn, Josephine Moate and Tiina Raakitainen (2007). Practical Classroom English. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Larsen-Freeman, Diane and Marti Andreson (2011). Techniques and Principles in Language Teaching. Oxford: OUP.
Lightbown, Patsy and Spada, Nina (2006). How Languages are Learned. 3rd Edition.Cambridge: CUP.
Loewen, Shawn (2015). Introduction to Instructed Second Language Acquisition. New York: Routledge.
Long, Mike(2015) Second Language Acquisition and Task-Based Language Teaching. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.
Richards, Jack C. and Willy A. Renandya (eds.) (2002). Methodology in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Richards, Jack C. and Theodore Rodgers (2001). Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching (Second Edition). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Scrivener, Jim (2005). Learning Teaching (2nd Edition) London:Macmillan
Spada, Nina (1997). Form-focused instruction and second language acquisition: A review of classroom and laboratory research. Language Teaching Abstracts, 30,73-87
Willis, Jane (1996). A Framework for Task-based Learning. Essex: Addison Wesley Longman.
Willis, Dave & Willis, Jane (2007). Doing Task-Based Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Not applicable.