Degree | Type | Year | Semester |
---|---|---|---|
4313148 Marketing | OT | 0 | 2 |
There are no prerequisites
Block I: Marketing Data Science
Marketing data science addresses the study of marketing problems from data, theories and experiments that study consumer behaviour. It is an interdisciplinary line of knowledge (marketing science, applied microeconomics, industrial organization, and statistical computing) that addresses topics such as the following: investigation of consumer choices and behaviour, evaluation of business decisions based on data, development and application of small and large-scale experiments, methods for the use of large amounts of data, computer methods for the analysis of data available on the Internet. This part is divided into two, applications of marketing data science with R and machine learning applications to marketing problems.
Block II: Behavioural Marketing
Behavioural marketing addresses the study of how individuals behave in relevant domains of consumption. This area of marketing is interdisciplinary and studies topics such as the following: marketing experiments, decision making, attitudes and persuasion, social influence, motivation, cognition, culture, non-conscious behaviour, neuroscience applied to the consumer, emotions. This part is divided into two, behavioural economics (fundamentals) and behavioural marketing (applications).
Block I: Marketing data science
Part A) Applications of marketing data science (Dr. Giuseppe Lamberti)
1) Design of new products considering consumers’ preferences
Introduction to conjoint analysis and its main applications
Choice of attributes and levels
Selection of the preference model
Data collection and measurement scale
Estimation of the underlying utility function
2) The importance of consumer satisfaction in Marketing strategy to increase the retention of the consumers: Customer Satisfaction Model
Models of customer satisfaction
Model Interpretation
Implications for the marketing strategy
3) Predict consumer choice through discrete choice models
Discrete choice models
Main applications
Estimation of parameters
Analysis of results
Application of discrete choice models to the conjoint analysis
Part B: Automatic learning models in marketing (Dr. José López Vicario)
This part of the module is based on the development of three mini-projects in the R environment of data analysis. Each mini-project develops a topic of marketing based on data, considering real data from digital marketing companies (AirBnB, Tripadvisor, Amazon) or social networks. The first project and also the second one will be developed in one session. The third project will be developed during two sessions because the concepts of neural networks and learning (deep learning) will be introduced
Social Media Analytics (Sentiment Analysis, Ultra-segmentation, Brand Engagement).
Recommendation system (Basket Market Analysis, Association Rules)
Forecasting Models for Marketing Decisions (Score Prediction, Regression Models vs. Neural Networks).
Block II: Marketing of consumer behaviour
C)Marketing of behaviour I: economics of human behavior (Dr. Jordi López Sintas)
Theory of value
Limited rationality: mental accounting; Limited information; 'Irrational' decisions
Theory of dual systems: Availability and affection; Information that stands out: Bias of the current situation and inertia
Social dimensions
Temporal dimensions
Applications to behavioural change
Ethical aspects
D) Marketing of behaviour II: Applications of behavioural economics to marketing (Dr. Pilar López Belbeze)
Experimentation as a complementary tool
Consumer behaviour and neuroscience
Analysis of the consumer choice process
Applications to product decisions
Applications to price decisions
Applications to brand decisions
Optimization of communication with consumers
Teaching methodology
Lecturing
Discussion of articles and cases in class
Practical sessions with cases.
Preparation of tests.
Oral presentation of essays.
Tutorials action
Personal study
Title | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|
Type: Directed | |||
Lectures, case discussion and presentation of short essays | 75 | 3 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 10, 6, 7, 9, 13, 14, 15, 16, 11, 17, 5, 19, 18, 20 |
Type: Supervised | |||
Tutorials and follow-up of the essays to be carried out and of the cases of analysis | 50 | 2 | 4, 9, 15, 17, 5, 20 |
Type: Autonomous | |||
Assigned readings, preparation of assignments and practical exercises, study and elaboration of schemes | 100 | 4 | 2, 4, 8, 12, 15, 21, 5, 20 |
Evaluation
Participation in class discussions (20%)
Deliveries of individual or collective work (40%)
Individual assessment through individual examination or delivery (40%)
This module is structured in different parts that are in charge of different lectures. The final grade of the module consists in the average of the notes of each subject or part that make up the module.
It is considered that the module has been approved if:
1 the mark of each part of the module is greater than or equal to 5 (on a scale of 0 to 10) and
2 the final grade of the module is greater than or equal to 5 (on a scale of 0 to 10)
If the module is not approved, the master's coordination will offer the student the possibility of re-evaluating the parts that make up the module that have not been passed if the grade is greater than 3.5, according to the assessment of lecturers and the coordination. If the student approves the re-evaluation the maximum grade that will be obtained in the re-evaluated part will be 5. The reassessment schedule will be made public along with the list of notes of the module.
The note of each part of the module
The student will have a Not Appraised Note if he / she does not attend at least 80% of the attendance classes (a check will be carried out with a signature sheet or with the activities done in class to evaluate) or if he does not do at least 66, 66% of the continuous evaluation activities. Each teacher will specify in this guide the way in which the students will evaluate. If not specified in the guide, these evaluation rules will be delivered the first day of class in writing.
The dates of the evaluation activities (midterm exams, exercises in the classroom, assignments, ...) will be announced well in advance during the semester.
The date of the final exam is scheduled in the assessment calendar of the Faculty.
"The dates of evaluation activities cannot be modified, unless there is an exceptional and duly justified reason why an evaluation activity cannot be carried out. In this case, the degree coordinator will contact both the teaching staff and the affected student, and a new date will be scheduled within the same academic period to make up for the missed evaluation activity." Section 1 of Article 115. Calendar of evaluation activities (Academic Regulations UAB). Students of the Faculty of Economics and Business, who in accordance with the previous paragraph need to change an evaluation activity date must process the request by filling out an Application for exams' reschedule https://eformularis.uab.cat/group/deganat_feie/application-for-exams-reschedule
Grade revision process
After all grading activities have ended, students will be informed of the date and way in which the course grades will be published. Students will be also be informed of the procedure, place, date and time of grade revision following University regulations.
Retake Process
"To be eligible to participate in the retake process, it is required for students to have been previously been evaluated for at least two thirds of the total evaluation activities of the subject." Section 3 of Article 112 ter. The recovery (UAB Academic Regulations).Additionally, it is required that the student to have achieved an average grade of the subject between 3.5 and 4.9.
All students are required to perform the evaluation activities. If the student's grade is 5 or higher, the student passes the course and it cannot be subject to further evaluation. If the student grade is less than 3.5, the student will have to repeat the course the following year. Students who have obtained a grade that is equal to or greater than 3.5 and less than 5 can take a second chance exam. The lecturers will decide the type of the second chance exam. When the second exam grade is greater than 5, the final grade will be a PASS with a maximum numerical grade of 5. When the second exam grade is less than 5, the final grade will be a FAIL with a numerical grade equal to the grade achieved in the course grade (not the second chance exam grade).
A student who does not perform any evaluative task is considered “not evaluable”, therefore, a student who performs a continuous assessment component can no longer be qualified with a "not evaluable".
The date of the retake exam will be posted in the calendar of evaluation activities of the Faculty. Students who take this exam and pass, will get a grade of 5 for the subject. If the student does not pass the retake, the grade will remain unchanged, and hence, student will fail the course.
Irregularities in evaluation activities
In spite of other disciplinary measures deemed appropriate, and in accordance with current academic regulations, "in the case that the student makes any irregularity that could lead to a significant variation in the grade of an evaluation activity, it will be graded with a 0, regardless of the disciplinary process that can be instructed. In case of various irregularities occur in the evaluation of the same subject, the final grade of this subject will be 0". Section 10 of Article 116. Results of the evaluation. (UAB Academic Regulations).
Title | Weighting | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
Attendance and participation in class discussions | 20% | 10 | 0.4 | 8, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 21, 5 |
Exercises for individual assessment | 40% | 3 | 0.12 | 10, 6, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 11 |
Individual or group exercises | 40% | 12 | 0.48 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 10, 6, 7, 9, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 11, 17, 21, 5, 19, 18, 20 |
Block A:
Lilien, G.L. and Rangaswamy, A., (2004) Marketing Engineering: Computer Assisted Marketing Analysis and Planning, Prentice Hall.
Chapman, N.C., and McDonnell, E., Feit. (2015) R for Marketing Research and Analytics, Springer-Verlag, Switzerland, 2015
Miller, T. W. (2015). Marketing Data Science: Modeling Techniques in Predictive Analytics with R and Python (01 edition). Old Tappan, New Jersey: Pearson FT Press. (https://mdsr-book.github.io/exercises.html)
Grigsby, M. (2015). Marketing Analytics: A practical guide to real marketing science (1 edition). London : Philadelphia: Kogan Page.
Block B:
Lantz, B. (2015) Machine Learning with R, Packt Publishing.
Chapman, C. and E. McDonnell Feit (2015) R for Marketing Research and Analytics, Springer.
Sharma,T., D. Sarkar, R. Bali (2017) Learning Social Media Analytics with R, Packt Publishing.
Block C:
https://www.behavioraleconomics.com/introduction-behavioral-economics/
Dhami, S. (2016). TheFoundations of Behavioral Economic Analysis.Oxford: OUP Oxford.
Gneezy, U., List, J. (2013). The Why Axis. Public Affair. Disponible en Castellano como: “Lo que Importa es el Porqué” en Empresa Activa (2014).
Kahneman, D. (1990). Experimental Tests of the Endowment Effect and the Coase Theorem. Journal of Political Economy, 98(6), 1325–1348.
Kahneman, D. (2003). Experienced utility and objective happiness: a moment-based approach. In I. Brocas & J. D. Carrillo (Eds.), The Psychology of Economic Decisions. Vol 1: Rationality and well-being. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kahneman, D. (2012). Thinking, Fast and Slow. London: Penguin.
Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2008). Nudge: improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Thaler, R. H. (2016). Misbehaving: The Making of Behavioural Economics (01 edition). London: Penguin. Disponible en castellano como: La Psicología Económica. Bilbao: Deusto.
Wilkinson, N. (2008). An Introduction to Behavioral Economics. Palgrave Macmillan.
Williams, B. (2017). Behavioural Economics for Business. Blurb.
Patzer, G. (1996). Experiment-Research Methodology in Marketing: Types and Applications. Praeger.
LOK, J. C. (n.d.). Judgement The difference between Behavioral Economy and Psychological Methods To Predict Consumption.
Block D:
Aydinli, A., Gu, Y., & Pham, M. T. (2017). An experience-utility explanation of the preference for larger assortments. International Journal of Research in Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2017.06.007
Barone, M. J., Bae, T. J., Qian, S., & d’Mello, J. (2017). Power and the appeal of the deal: how consumers value the control provided by Pay What You Want (PWYW) pricing. Marketing Letters, 28(3), 437–447. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-017-9425-6
Blanco, R. Á. D. (2012). Neuromarketing, fusión perfecta. Pearson España.
Brañas Garza, P. (Ed.). (2011). Economía experimental y del comportamiento | de Pablo Brañas Garza. Barcelona: Antoni Bosch Editor. Retrieved from http://www.antonibosch.com/libro/economia-experimental-y-del-comportamiento
Genco, S. J., Pohlmann, A. P., & Steidl, P. (2013). Neuromarketing For Dummies (Edición: 1). Mississauga: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
Gneezy, U., & List, J. (2014). Lo que importa es el porqué: Los motivos económicos ocultos de nuestras acciones. (M. D. Merino, Trans.). Empresa AC.
Praet, D. V. (2014). Unconscious Branding: How Neuroscience Can Empower (and Inspire) Marketing (Edición: Reprint). Palgrave Macmillan.
Renvoise, P., & Morin, C. (2007). Neuromarketing: Understanding the Buy Buttons in Your Customer’s Brain. Thomas Nelson.
Walters, D., & Nussey, B. (2015). Behavioral Marketing: Delivering Personalized Experiences At Scale (1 edition). Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley.
Yan, J., Tian, K., Heravi, S., & Morgan, P. (2017). The vices and virtues of consumption choices: price promotion and consumer decision making. Marketing Letters, 28(3), 461–475. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-017-9421-x