Degree | Type | Year | Semester |
---|---|---|---|
4313402 Psychosocial Research and Intervention | OB | 0 | 2 |
None
. Know the main contemporary debates about ethics and chicks in the psychosocial field
. Analyse the ethical and political principles that guide the practice of psychosocial and community research and intervention.
. Identify different ethical and political dilemmas present in work with people, groups and populations.
. Reflect on the ethical and political implications deriving from professional involvement in specific psychosocial phenomena and problems
. Prepare the research work itself for evaluation by the ethics committee.
Content
-Introduction to research ethics and politics
-Ethical and political aspects of entry to the field
-Ethics Committee.
-Ethical-political implications of being part of the field
-Ethical and political aspects of entry to the field
-Political effects of research and intervention
-Ethical-political implications of praxis
-Political and ethical aspects of the dissemination of results
-Ethics of responsibility and ethics of care
-Ethical and political aspects of working in / with institutions
-Ethics and politics in the public space
Autonomous activities
Systematic reading of bibliographic material.
Analysis of and reflection on the recommended readings
Development of a personal reflection
Directed activities
Presentation of the different contents
Presentation and analysis of the different proposals and readings for each session
Oral presentation of a topic previously agreed and worked on
Discussion and participation in the group-class
Supervised activities
Individual tutorials to prepare the oral presentation.
Tutorials for making the final reflection.
Title | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|
Type: Directed | |||
Oral presentation of a topic previously agreed and worked on Discussion and participation in the group-class | 40 | 1.6 | 1, 3 |
Presentation of the different contents Presentation and analysis of the different proposals and readings for each session | 20 | 0.8 | 1, 2, 4 |
Type: Supervised | |||
Individual tutorials to prepare the oral presentation. | 14 | 0.56 | 1, 2, 3, 4 |
Tutorials for making the final reflection. | 20 | 0.8 | 1, 2, 3 |
Type: Autonomous | |||
Sistematic reading of bibliographic material. Analysis of and reflection on the recommended readings. develope of a personal reflection | 90 | 3.6 | 2 |
EV1. Oral presentation on ethics in intervention and/or research.
EV2. Work of reflection on the ethical and political aspects of the research work and/or intervention.
EV3. Report on the application of the module to the TFM process, corrected by the student's tutor in accordance with the guidelines set by the module coordinator.
Grading criteria
Module passed: The module will be considered passed if the student obtains an average score higher than 5 in the set of assessment tests[
Evaluable. Evaluable evidence of learning has a weight equal to or greater than 40% of the total module.
Non-Evaluable. Non-evaluable evidence of learning has a weight less than 40% of the total module.
Reassessment: There is no reassessment.
Evaluation guidelines of the Faculty of Psychology: http://www.uab.cat/doc/DOC_avaluaciotitulacions1819
Evaluation:
Oral exposure 30%
Critical writing about ethics and politics aspects of the research and/or intervention 50%
Report on the application of the module to the TFM process, corrected by the student's tutor in accordance with the guidelines set by the module coordinator. 20%
Title | Weighting | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
EV1. Oral presentation on ethics in intervention and/or research. | 30 | 1 | 0.04 | 1, 2, 4 |
EV2. Work of reflection on the ethical and political aspects of the research work and/or intervention. | 50 | 40 | 1.6 | 1, 3 |
EV3. Report on the application of the module to the TFM process, corrected by the student's tutor in accordance with the guidelines set by the module coordinator. | 20 | 0 | 0 | 1, 3 |
Raymond M. Lee and Claire M. Renzetti. The Problems of Researching Sensitive Topics: An Overview and introduction. American Behavioral Scientist. 1990 33:510
Denscombe, Martyn (2007). The good research guide: For small-scale social research projects (Third Edition). Berkshire: Open University Press.
Ibáñez, T. Los efectos políticos de la psicología social. Quaderns de Psicologia, 1983, 11, 95-106
Ibáñez, J. (1986) Perspectivas de la Investigación Social: el diseño en las tres perspectivas. En M. García Ferrando, J. Ibáñez y F. Alvira (Comps.) El análisis de la realidad social. Métodos y técnicas de investigación. Madrid: Alianza Editorial, 1996.
Ibáñez, T. e Íñiguez, L. (1997) Aspectos Metodológicos de la Psicología Social Aplicada. En J.L. Álvaro, A. Garrido y J.R. Torregrosa (Coords.) Psicol ogía Social Aplicada. Madrid: McGraw Hill.
Denzin, K. y Lincoln, Y.S. (Eds.) (1994) Handbook of Qualitative Research. London: Sage.
Pla, M. (1999) El rigor en la investigación cualitativa. Atención Primaria, 5 (24),
295-300.
Taylor, S.J. y Bogdan, R. (1984) Introducción a los métodos cualitativos de investigación. Barcelona: Paidós, 1987
Beaulieu Estalella Rethinking Research Ethics , Anne Beaulieu y Adolfo Estalella. 5th International Conference on e-So
cial Science, Colonia (Alemania), 24-26/06/2009
Common values, controversial facts: Enacting dialogical ethics Ponencia invitada en el 11th Annual workshop of the Center for Qualitative Psychology , Sassari (Italia), 12-14 de marzo de 2010.
Gilligan, C. (1982).In a different voice: Psychological theory and women's development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Kohen, B. (2005). Ciudadanía y ética del cuidado. E. Carrió y D. Maffía (Eds) Búsquedas de sentido para una nueva política. Buenos Aires: Paidós.
Kohlberg, L. (1981). The Philosophy of Moral Development. Moral Stages and the Idea of Justice. San Francisco: Harper & Row Pubs.
Matín-Palomo, M. T. (2010). Autonomía, dependencia y vulnerabilidad en la construcción de la ciudadanía. Zerbitzuan: revista de servicios sociales, 48: 57-69.