Degree | Type | Year | Semester |
---|---|---|---|
4313157 Advanced English Studies | OT | 0 | 1 |
Basic knowledge of linguistics is necessary to follow this course; in particular, previous knowledge of general phonetics and phonology and familiarity with the English sound system will considerably facilitate following this subject.
Students will be introduced to the main topics and theories in second language acquisition research with an emphasis on the acquisition of phonology and lexical access. Students will become familiar with current research methods and data analysis techniques through an analysis of representative literature and class discussion and assignments.
Objectives:
1. Introduction to the study of speech. Research methods in L2 speech.
2. Main issues in L2 speech. Theories and models in L2 speech acquisition.
3. The speech learning model (SLM). The Perceptual Assimilation Model (PAM). The Native Language Magnet model (NLMM). Feature Models.
4. Introduction to speech analysis. Categorization in phonology.
5. Factors affecting the degree of foreign accent. Age and confounds with age in the acquisition of phonology.
6. Intelligibility, comprehensibility and foreign accent.
7. Speech perception in L2 learning.
8. Speech production in L2. Relation between perception and production.
9. The acquisition of suprasegmental structure.
10. Phonetic training and L2 speech acquisition.
11. L2 speech and lexical access. Priming studies.
Lectures and illustrations, discussion of readings, in-class exercises, labs, discussion of assignments, student presentations, data collection and analysis.
Title | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|
Type: Directed | |||
Lectures | 15 | 0.6 | 2, 3, 10 |
Practical sessions | 15 | 0.6 | 1, 2, 9, 5, 4, 3, 11, 10 |
Type: Supervised | |||
Assignments | 45 | 1.8 | 5, 4, 6, 8, 12, 3, 11, 10 |
Readings and discussion | 25 | 1 | 1, 5, 8, 12, 3 |
Type: Autonomous | |||
Homework and study | 25 | 1 | 2, 5, 6, 8, 3 |
Continuous assessment based on class participation, assignments, and final paper (oral presentation and written paper).
Final paper or exam - 50%
Assignments - 40%
Exercises and class participation - 10%
Students are required to complete all the assignments and final paper to pass the course.
Students will obtain a Not assessed/Not submitted course grade unless they have submitted more than 30% of the assessment items.
IMPORTANT: PLAGIARISING consists of copying text from unacknowledged sources –whether this is part of a sentence or a whole text– with the intention of passing it off as the student’s own production. It includes cutting and pasting from internet sources, presented unmodified in the student’s own text. Plagiarising is a SERIOUS OFFENCE. Students must respect authors’ intellectual property, always identifying the sources they may use; they must also be responsible for the originality and authenticity of their own texts.
In the event of a student committing any irregularity that may lead to a significant variation in the grade awarded to an assessment activity, the student will be given a zero for this activity, regardless of any disciplinary process that may take place. In the event of several irregularities in assessment activities of the same subject, the student will be given a zero as the final grade for this subject.
On carrying out each assessment activity, lecturers will inform students (on Moodle) of the procedures to be followed for reviewing all grades awarded, and the date on which such a review will take place.
In the event that tests or exams cannot be taken onsite, they will be adapted to an online format made available through the UAB’s virtual tools (original weighting will be maintained). Homework, activities and class participation will be carried out through forums, wikis and/or discussion onTeams, etc. Lecturers will ensure that students are able to access these virtual tools, or will offer them feasible alternatives.
Reassessment
Students will be able to rewrite their final paper or exam if it does not reach a passing mark (5/10) and the course average is at least 3.5 out of 10.
Title | Weighting | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
Assignments | 40% | 12.5 | 0.5 | 2, 5, 6, 8, 7, 3, 11 |
Term paper or exam | 50% | 12.5 | 0.5 | 1, 2, 9, 5, 4, 6, 12, 3, 10 |
class participation | 10% | 0 | 0 | 5, 6, 8, 3, 11 |
References
-Background readings in (English) phonetics and phonology
Ladefoged, Peter. 1993. A Course in Phonetics. Boston, MA: Thomson Wadsworth. -Chapter 8. Acoustic phonetics.
Spencer, Andrew. (1996). Phonology. Oxford: Blackwell. -Chapter 1. Preliminaries to Phonology
-Readings
Bent, Tessa & Ann R. Bradlow. 2003. The interlanguage speech intelligibility benefit. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 114 (3), 1600-1610.
Best, Catherine T., McRoberts, Gerald W., and Goodell, Elizabeth. 2001. Discrimination of non-native consonant contrasts varying in perceptual assimilation to the listener’s native phonological system. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 109(2): 775–794.
Bradlow, Ann R. & David B. Pisoni. 1999. Recognition of spoken words by native and non-native listeners: Talker-, listener-, and item-related factors. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106 (4), 2074-2085.
Flege, James E. 1987. The production of new and similar phones in a foreign language: Evidence for the effect of equivalence classification. Journal of Phonetics, 15, 47-65.
Flege, James E. 2002. Interactions between the native and the second language phonetic systems. In P. Burmeister, T. Piske and A. Rohde (Eds.). An Integrated View of Language Development: Papers in Honor of Henning Wode. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag, pp. 217-243.
Leather, Jonathan. 1999. Second language speech research: an introduction. In J. Leather (ed.), Phonological Issues in Language Learning. Oxfod: Basil Blackwell, pp. 1-58.
Logan, John. S. & John S. Pruitt. 1995. Methodological issues in training listeners to perceive non-native sounds. In W. Strange (Ed.). Speech perception and Linguistic Experience: Theoretical and Methodological Issues. Timonium, MD: York Press, pp. 351-378.
Marian, Viorica, Spivey, Michael. 2003. Competing activation in bilingual language processing. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 6, 97–115.
Munro, Murray. J. & Ocke-Schwen Bohn. 2007. The study of second language speech. In Bohn, O-S. & M. J. Munro (eds.). Language Experience in Second Language Speech Learning. In honor of James Emil Flege. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp.3-11.
Munro, Murray J. & Tracey Derwing. 1999. Foreign accent, comprehensibility, and intelligibility in the speech of second language learners. Language Learning 45:1, pp. 73-97.
Munro, Murray J. & Tracey Derwing. 2015. A prospectus for pronunciation research in the 21st century. A point of view. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation 1:1, 11–42.
Piske, T., I.R.A. MacKay & J.E. Flege. 2001. Factors affecting degree of foreign accent in an L2: a review. Journal of Phonetics, 29, 191-215. (Also an overview of factors affecting L2 learning).
Saito, Kazuya, Pavel Trofimovich, Talia Isaacs, Stuart & Webb. 2016. Re-examining Phonological and Lexical Correlates of Second Language Comprehensibility: The Role of Rater Experience. In T. Isaacs, & P. Trofimovich (Eds.), Second Language Pronunciation Assessment: Interdisciplinary Perspectives. Bristol: Multilingual Matters, pp. 141-156.
Trofimovich, Pavel, & Paul John, 2011. When three equals tree: Examining the nature of phonological entries in L2 lexicons of Quebec speakers of English. In P. Trofimovich & K. McDonough (Eds.), Applying priming methods to L2 learning, teaching and research: Insights from psycholinguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 105-129.
Weber, Andrea, & Cutler, Anne. 2004. Lexical competition in non-native spoken-word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 50(1), 1-25.
See also: http://liceu.uab.es/~joaquim/applied_linguistics/L2_phonetics/Fonetica_L2_Bib.html