Degree | Type | Year | Semester |
---|---|---|---|
2503878 Sociocultural Gender Studies | OT | 3 | 2 |
None.
Contextualization
The socio-affective relations are those that are given in the coexistence with diverse people (society, family, friendship, couple, work,...). The social and cultural construction derived from the genre and the capacities that supposedly derive from it, is very present in the affective relationships. Stereotypes and gender roles determine the affective experience of men and women in different contexts and can make affective relationships not develop in a plan of equality and end up deriving in situations of gender violence. Violence in couples is a risk factor for Health, both physically and mentally. The chronic stress involved in mistreatment favours the appearance of diferent diseases and worsens existing ones. There are psychological and cultural barriers that make it difficult to talk about violence in the couple. The psychological consequences of the experience of gender violence at home, causes clinical pathologies in minors and being witnesses in their home can generate attitudes of their own use of violence (with the perception that it is allowed and that does not affect their behaviour in interpersonal relationships). In this subject apart from reviewing in depth all these aspects will also address the various existing psychosocial resources for tackling socio - affective violence; And in turn, will contemplate the characteristics of the Burnout syndrome in the and the professionals that work in socioaffective violences.
Training objectives of the subject
T1- Socio - affective violence through the different current social models of gender.
T2- Myths and realities. Perceived violence and technical violence.
T3- Barriers in the perception of violence in the couple.
T4- Tools for the detection of gender - based violence in the area of the couple.
T5- Impact and development of socio – affective violence on women’s psychological health.
T6- The abuse in sons and daughters of women who have suffered violence in the couple: victims and witnesses.
T7- The intergenerational transmission of socio – affective violence in the field of the relationship.
T8- Map and typology of existing psychosocial resources for tackling socio - affective violence.
T9- Characteristics of the burnout syndrome in professionals who work in socio – affective violence ( in the couple, family, etc.).
It is intended that students learn about diferent forms of violence that can occur in socio – affective relationships, as well as the possible myths associated with the subject. Also the main potencial barriers in the detection of violence in the couple in professional and health contexts. Also, the main repercussions and consequences of gender based violence on health. In minors, in the short term we would talk about consequences in diferent areas at the social, school, behavioral or emotional level. However the long term consequences are related to the intergenerational transmission of violence. Finally it will be intended that students know the existing psychosocial resources for dealing with socio – affective violence. And emotional exhaustion or burnout syndrome, which can occur in professionals working in socio – affective violence.
This subject includes guided activities, which are mainly expository theoretical classes with material suport on the virtual campus, and practical classes based on seminars with text presentation and case study and discussion.
The supervised activity consists of tutoring to carry out the work (report) based on the internship sessions, and which will be presented in small groups orally at the end of the internship.
In order to achieve the expected knowledge, students must carry out independent work consistint of reading texts proposed by teachers and finding appropriate material to properly perform the internship work.
Title | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|
Type: Directed | |||
Master Classes | 20 | 0.8 | 3, 4, 6, 7 |
Practical classes based on seminars | 30 | 1.2 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 |
Type: Supervised | |||
Tutoring | 10 | 0.4 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 |
Type: Autonomous | |||
Case preparation assignments | 86.5 | 3.46 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 |
The evaluation of the subject will be divided into three evidences of learning: Ev1, Ev2 i Ev3. Ev1 i Ev3 will focus on the theoretical aspects and will correspond to 60% of the final grade. The Ev3 will evaluate practical aspects, represented 40% of the final grade.
Ev1. It will be assessed a test type test. Weighting 30% (first evaluation period)
Ev3. It will be assessed with an open – ended test. Weighting 30% (second evaluation period).
Ev2 (Practical evaluation). It will be valued with the group written report (3 or 4 people), where the achievement of the theoretical and applied knowledge of the cases presented and worked in the practice sessions will have to be shown. Weighting 40% (second evaluation period). Completion of this evidence is essential to pass the course.
The final grade for continuous assessment will be obtained from the weighted sum of the scores of the evidence (final grade = Ev1+Ev2+Ev3).
Students who have submitted evidence of learning with a weight equal to or greater than 40% may not be listed as “non – assessable”.
To pass the subject with continuous assessment you must obtain a minimum score of 5 in the weighted final grade. You must have obtained a minimum grade of 4 points in the EV3 evidence to calculate the weighted final grade. You must have passed at least one of the EV1 or EV3 evidence in order to be able to do the weighting with the Ev2.
Procedure for reviewing grades
At the time of each assessment activity, the teacher will inform students of the procedure and the date of the review of grades.
Recovery
A recovery test may be performed. In order to take the resit test, thenweighted final grade must be calculated at a minimum of 3.5 points and a maximum of 4.9 points. This test will include test –questionnaire type-. In addition, during the continuous assessment, students must have submitted evidence with a minimum weight of 2/3 (both exams). The grade obtained will be added to the weighted grade. The test will be scored between 0 and 2 points. It is necessary to pass this exam (obtain a minimum of 1 point) in order for its value to be added to the weighted final grade previously obtained in the subject. To pass the course you must obtain a minimum score of 5 in the weighted final grade. And there would be no activities excluded from recovery.
Non – evaluable activities will be reported at the beginning of the course, if applicable.
In the event that tests or exams cannot be taken onsite, they will be adapted to an online format made available through the UAB’s virtual tools (the original weighing will be maintained). Homework, activities and class participation will be carried out through forums, wikis and/or discussion on Teams, etc. Instructors will ensure that students are able to access these virtual tools, or will offer them feasible alternatives.
In the event of a student committing any irregularity that may lead to a significant variation in the grade awarded to an assessment activity, the student will be given a zero for this activity, regardless of any disciplinary process that may take place. In the event of several irregularities in assessment activities, the student will receive a zero as the final grade for the class.
Title | Weighting | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
Exam open type questions | 30% | 2 | 0.08 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 |
Present a group report of a case worked on in practice.. | 40% | 0 | 0 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 |
Test examination | 30% | 1.5 | 0.06 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 |
1) Acinas, M. P. (2012). Burnout and wear and tear by empathy in palliative care professionals. Digital journal of psychosomatic medicine and psychotherapy, 2(4), 1-22.
2) Black, M.C. (2011). Intimate partner violence and adverse health consequences; Implications for clinicians. Am J Lifestyle Med, 5, 428-439.
3) Benito, E; Arranz P; Cancio, H. (2010). Tools for the self – care of professionals who care for people who suffer. FMC ( Continuing Medical Education) Primary Care. Barcelona: Elsevier.
4) Bosch, E. (2013). Violence against women: love as an alibi. Violence against women, 1-384.
5) Bosch, E., Ferrer, V. A., García, E., Ramis, M. C., Mas, M. C., Navarro, C., & Torrens, G. (2007). From the myth of romantic love to violence against women in the couple. Ministry of Equality, Women’s Institute, University of the Balearic Islands, 175.
6) Cantera, L. M., & Cantera, F. M. (2014). Active self – care and its importance for Community Psychology. Psychoperspectives, 13(2), 88-97.
7) D’Andrea, W., & Graham-Berman, S. (2017). Social context and violence exposure as predictors of internalizing symptoms in mothers and children exposed to intimate partner violence. Journal of family violence, 32(2), 145-155.
8) De Salud, S. M. (2010). Clinical practice guide. Mental health action in women abused by their partner. Murcian Health Service.
9) Escudero Nafs, A., Polo Usaola, C., López Gironés, M., & Aguilar Redo, L. (2005). Coercive persuasión, an explanatory model for keeping women in a situation of gender violence: I: Strategies for violence. Journal of the SpanishAssociation of Neuropsychiatry, (95), 85-117.
10) Escudero Nafs, A., Polo Usaola, C., López Gironés, M., & Aguilar Redo, L. (2005). Coercive persuasión, an explanatory model for keeping women in a situation of gender violence: II: The emotions and strategies of violence. Journal of the Spanish Association of Neuropsychiatry, (96), 59-91.
11) Ferrer, V. A., Bosch, E., & Navarro, C. (2010). Romantic myths in Spain. Psychology bulletin, 99, 7-31.
12) Fogarty, A., Wood, C. E., Giallo, R., Kaufman, J., & Hansen, M. (2019). Factors promoting emotional‐behavioural resilience and adjustment in children exposed to intimate partner violence: A systematic review. Australian journal of psychology, 71(4), 375-389.
13) Fong, V. C., Hawes, D., & Allen, J. L. (2019). A systematic review of risk and protective factors for externalizing problems in children exposed to intimate partner violence. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 20(2), 149-167.
14) Gentry, J. E., Baggerly, J. & Baranowsky, A. (2004). Training-as-treatment: effectiveness of the certified compassion fatigue specialist training. International Journal of Emergency Mental Health. 6 (3), 147-158
15) Herman, Judith. (2004). Trauma and Recovery. How to overcome the consequences of violence. Pozuelo de Alarcón (Madrid): Espasa Calpe.
16) Holmes, M. R. (2013). Aggressive behavior of children exposed to intimate partner violence: An examination of maternal mental health, maternal warmth and child maltreatment. Child abuse & neglect, 37(8), 520-530.
17) Juster, R. P., Pruessner, J. C., Desrochers, A. B., Bourdon, O., Durand, N., Wan, N., ... & Lupien, S. J. (2016). Sex and gender roles in relation to mental health and allostatic load.Psychosomatic medicine, 78(7), 788-804.
18) Lünnemann, M. K. M., Van der Horst, F. C. P., Prinzie, P., Luijk, M. P. C. M., & Steketee, M. (2019). The intergenerational impact of trauma and family violence on parents and their children. Child abuse & neglect, 96, 104134.
19) Mitchell, C., (Ed). Intimate partner violence: A health-based perspective. New York: Oxford University Press, 2009.
20) Ortega, L. R., Pérez, I. R., Castaño, J. P., López-Abisab, S. B., Lozano, D. R., de Vinuesa, L. G., ... & Hidalgo, M. A. (2004). Intimate partner violence as a factor associated to health problems. Atención Primaria, 34, 117-124.
21) Pico-Alfonso, M. A., Garcia-Linares, M. I., Celda-Navarro, N., Blasco-Ros, C., Echeburúa, E., & Martinez, M. (2006). The impact of physical, psychological, and sexual intimate male partner violence on women's mental health: depressive symptoms, posttraumatic stress disorder, state anxiety, and suicide. Journal of women's health, 15(5), 599-611.
22) Pico-Alfonso, M. A., Echeburúa, E., & Martinez, M. (2008). Personality disorder symptoms in women as a result of chronic intimate male partner violence. Journal of Family Violence, 23(7), 577-588.
23) Maslach, C. (1982). Burn-out: the cost of caring. Englewood cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
24) Maslach Burn-out Inventory (3ª ed.). Palo Alto. CA. Consulting Psychologists Press.
25) Vu, N. L., Jouriles, E. N., McDonald, R., & Rosenfield, D. (2016). Children's exposure to intimate partner violence: A meta-analysis of longitudinal associations with child adjustment problems. Clinical psychology review, 46, 25-33.
26) Torres, A., Navarro, P., García-Esteve, L., Tarragona, M. J., Ascaso, C., Herreras, Z., ... & Martín-Santos, R. (2010). Detecting domestic violence: Spanish external validation of the index of spouse abuse. Journal of Family Violence, 25(3), 275-286.
27) Van der Kolk, Bessel (2015). The body keeps track. Brain, mind and body in overcoming trauma. Barcelona: Eleftheria.
28) Yule, K., Houston, J., & Grych, J. (2019). Resilience in children exposed to violence: a meta-analysis of protective factors across ecological contexts. Clinical child and family psychology review, 22(3), 406-431.
Web links:
Centre for Health and Gender Equity (CHANGE): http://www.genderhealth.org
Organización Mundial de la Salud (OMS): http://www.who.int/topics/womens_health/es
World Health Organization Genere: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs403/es