Degree | Type | Year | Semester |
---|---|---|---|
2500798 Primary Education | OT | 4 | 0 |
It is suggested that students who enroll in this course have taken and passed the subjects of the degree of Primary Education Teachers following :
" Matemàtiques per mestres " first year , " Aprenentatge de les matemàtiques i curriculum " seond year and " Gestió i innovació a l'aula de matemàtiques " third year .
With the white light, Isaac Newton, he devised a plan to make it pass through a prism of glass revealed a beautiful rainbow that left astonished the experts of the Royal Society. This generated a direct question; white light is composed of all colors or was it the prism which colored it light? No more complexity than passing the multicolored light with an identical prism reversed the effect, returning to the vision of white light. This process was a bit more complex, but resolved the doubt.
In the same way that Sir Isaac, we spend many mathematical concepts through the prism of the education system, breaking it into different subjects. Instead, our students are not as demanding as the Royal Society and the first experiment have enough. The teachers expect students to be able to conclude the second prism but sometimes it not happens. Reality shows us that it is not an easy task and it is necessary to generate learning opportunities to develop.
In this course we learn to identify opportunities for learning in different contexts that lead us to practice using the second prism, connecting different subjects to work mathematical concepts more broadly.
To do this we will focus on practical models used in the classrooms of innovative schools: project work and work by corners, while developing the necessary evaluation tools.
So we learn to use tools to redirect this rainbow of material to a second prism, the interdisciplinary work.
OBJECTIVES:
**Our teaching approach and assessment procedures may be altered if public health authorities impose new restrictions on public gatherings for COVID-19**
The protagonist in the educational process is the student and it is on this premise that has been planned methodology of the subject.As this is an optional subject , all the sessions will be done with the whole group class .
Still , as indicated in the methodology , there will be sessions where a small job in the classroom under the supervision of the teacher will be performed.
Title | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|
Type: Directed | |||
Exhibitions by the teacher (BG) | 20 | 0.8 | 2, 6 |
Type: Supervised | |||
Workshop analysis of didactic proposals (SG) | 30 | 1.2 | 4, 5 |
Workshop creation of didactic proposals (SG ) | 30 | 1.2 | 4, 5 |
Type: Autonomous | |||
Project (BG) | 20 | 0.8 | 2, 4, 5, 6 |
**Our teaching approach and assessment procedures may be altered if public health authorities impose new restrictions on public gatherings for COVID-19**
The evaluation of the course will take place throughout the academic year and it will be computed using the gradings of the following tasks:
The student must take into account the assessment in policy considerations in the document: "Criteris i pautes generals d'avaluació de la Facultat de Ciències de l’Educació" (http://www.uab.cat/web/informacio- academic / AVALUACIO / rules-1292571269103.html)
As well as:
- Attendance at the contact sessions of this course is mandatory, at least to 80% of them. In case the student does not attend to this mininum they will be considered as not presented. A student that does not hand in all assessment activities in the corresponding periods will also be considered as not presented.
- The note of group work is not necessarily the individual score of students in the group.
- The total or partial plagiarism of one of the activities and / or copy an assessment test is a direct reason for suspense of the subject.
- The marks obtained in each of the evaluation activities will be delivered tostudents within 15 days of its completion. Once delivered to the student may review and consultation on the schedule set by the teacher.
Title | Weighting | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
Microproyects I - individual | 30% | 17.5 | 0.7 | 1, 2, 7, 4, 5, 3, 6 |
Microproyects II - group | 30% | 17.5 | 0.7 | 1, 2, 7, 4, 5, 3, 6 |
Test - individual | 20% | 5 | 0.2 | 2 |
Video proyect - group | 20% | 10 | 0.4 | 5 |
Alsina, C. (1998): Mathematics and Cross-Curricular Activities. Bridges Exist for Crossing them A: ZDM vol.30(2), p.34-36
Christiansen, I. M. (1998): Cross-Curricular Activities Within One Subject? Modeling Ozone Depletion in 12th Grade. A: ZDM vol.30(2), p.22-27
Corbalán, F. (2007). Matemáticas de la vida misma. Barcelona: Graó.
Gallego Lázaro, C. (2005). Repensar el aprendizaje de las matemáticas :Matemáticas para convivir comprendiendo el mundo. Barcelona: Graó.
Greeno, J. (1992): Mathematical and Scientific Thinking in Classrooms and Other Situations. A:Enhancing Thinking Skills in the Sciences and Mathematics, p.39-63
Hughes-Hallett, D. (1998): Interdisciplinary Activities in Mathematics and Science in the United States. A: ZDM vol.30(4), p 116-118
Jorba, J.; Sanmartí, N. (1994). Enseñar, aprender y evaluar: un proceso de regulación continua. Madrid: Centro de Investigación y Documentación Educativa
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity: Cambridge University Press.
Michelsen,C., Glargaard, N. I Dejgaard, J. (2005): Interdisciplinary Competences-Integrating mathematics and subjects of natural sciences. In M. Anaya, C.
Michelsen i B. Sriraman (Ed.)Proceedings of the 1st International Symposium of Mathematics and its Connections to the Arts ans Sciences. p 201-214
Sanmartí, N. (2007). 10 ideas clave. Evaluar para aprender. Barcelona: Graó
Currículum educació primària. Decret 119/2015: http://ensenyament.gencat.cat/ca/departament/publicacions/colleccions/curriculum/curriculum-ed-primaria/