Degree | Type | Year | Semester |
---|---|---|---|
4313769 Anthropology: Advanced Research and Social Intervention | OT | 0 | 2 |
There are no entry requierements. This course is addressed, exclusively, to students enrolled in the module "E3 - Socio-cultural and environmental Intervention".
Students are expected to participate in a project of social intervention in an institution with which the university has an agreement. The primary goals of this training course are the development of abilities of social interaction with culturally diverse groups, empathic listening skills and inter-professional collaboration skills, combining in-person and online tasks.
Main goals:
Specific goals:
This course has a training character and is scheduled in the second semester of the academic year. Students will temporarily join a real work team within a previously selected organization or institution. In this way, the course aims to facilitate the application of acquired knowledge to the professional intervention in a particular social and cultural context, and simultaneously it intends to stimulate critical reflections about the social application of anthropological knowledge, about ethics in research and social intervention, and about the professionalization of Anthropology.
The coordinator of the module will assign each student to a center or training place on the basis of the recommendations of the academic tutor, the interests of the student and the options that are available during the course in each area.
The student will join the activities of this team, developing specific research or intervention tasks previously agreed upon. Through this set of activties the student can put into practice the knowledge acquired during the Master and, moreover, contributing to the team the point of view of the anthropology with respect to the problems or situations the team is working on. The dates and times of the training are established according to the agenda of the students and the entity where the training is performed.
Each student will have both a professional tutor assigned by the center and an academic tutor at the Department. Both will ensure that the training proceeds adequately and that the goals and commitments on behalf of the student, the collaborating entity and the UAB are fulfilled.
Each student will elaborate a report addressed to the institution or organization, which he or she will deliver at the end of the training period.
• Tutorials, individually and/or in small groups: 15 hours
• Practicum in entity: 90 hours.
• Individual work: 45 hours.
Title | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|
Type: Supervised | |||
Tutorial activities, individual or/and in small groups | 15 | 0.6 | 1, 5, 3, 4, 7, 6, 8, 12, 10, 11 |
Type: Autonomous | |||
Practicum in-company. Development of a practicum report. Review of literature and documents of interest | 135 | 5.4 | 2, 7, 6 |
This section of the Study Guide contains all information related to the process of evaluation of the module.
Assessment of the module:
The course "External Work Experience" is compulsory.
The final grade is based on the following criteria:
- Report of the performed work: 40-50%. The report will be submitted within 15 days after having finished the training period.
• Description of the institution where the practicum has taken place.
• Detailed description of the work done during the practicum.
• List of recommendations supported by both theroretical and empirical arguments.
- Assessment report about the practicum: 10-15%
• Evaluation of the adequacy of knowledge and skills acquired during the Master for the development of the practicum.
• Assessment of knowledge and skills acquired during the practicum.
• Description of constraints, incidents and problems encountered during the practicum and the developed strategies to address them.
• Final evaluation of the practicum and suggestions.
- Assessment of the professional tutor assigned by the organization: 10-20%
- Attendance to tutorial sessions: 10-20%
The final deadline for the submission of the report is one week before the official deadline for submitting the grades. It is essential to respect the deadline.
In general, not submitting the documents that are to be evaluated results in the qualification "Not assessable". In exceptional, well justified cases, the Committee of the Master Program may propose an alternative procedure for the evaluation.
General criteria
Assessment is understood as a continued process throughout the term.
The qualifications are made on a scale from 0-10 with onedecimal. To pass the subject, a minimum final grade of 5.0 is needed, as a result of the assessment procedure explained above. Once the subject is passed, it cannot be subjected to a new evaluation.
The programming of assessment activities cannot be modified unless an exceptional and well justified reason exists for this, in which case a new program is proposed during the lective term.
When a student performs an irregularity that can lead to a significant variation of the qualification of an assessable activity, the activity will be qualified with a 0, independently of the disciplinary process that might follow. In the case that various irregularities in the assessable activities are performed within the same module, the qualification of the module will be 0.
The qualification "not assessable" in the final records of evaluation implies the exhaustion of rights inherent in the enrolment to the module, although the "not assessable" module will not figure in the academic transcript.
The copying or plagiarism of material, both in the case of papers as in the case of exams will be sanctioned with the qualification 0 on the activities, the loss of the right of reevaluation, and being suspended from the module. "Copying" a paper refers to a student reproducing the whole or part of a paper of another student. Plagiarism is presenting the whole or a part of the text of another author as if it were the student´s own, without citing the references, on paper or digitally. Please see the documentation of the UAB about plagiarism on: http://wuster.uab.es/web_argumenta_obert/unit_20/sot_2_01.html
In the event that the exams cannot be done in person, their format will be adapted (maintaining their weighting) to the possibilities offered by theUAB’s virtual tools. Homework, activities and classparticipation will be done through forums, wikis and / or discussion discussions through Teams, ensuring that all students can access them.
Title | Weighting | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
Assesment by the tutor assigned by the institution | 10-20% | 0 | 0 | 3, 9, 8, 12, 10 |
Assessment report about the practicum | 10-15% | 0 | 0 | 2, 1, 3, 9, 4, 7, 6, 8, 12, 10, 11 |
Classroom attendance and tutorial sessions | 10-20% | 0 | 0 | 1, 11 |
Report | 40-50% | 0 | 0 | 2, 1, 5, 3, 9, 4, 7, 6, 8, 12, 10, 11 |
Harris, Marvin (1997). ¿Qué es la antropología aplicada? en Guerrero, Patricio (comp.), Antropología Aplicada. Quito: EPS.
San Román Teresa (2009). Sobre la investigación etnográfica. Revista de antropología social, 18:235-260.
San Román Teresa (2006). ¿Acaso es evitable? El impacto de la Antropología en las relaciones e imágenes sociales. Revista de Antropología Social, 15:373-410
Valdés María (2012). Antropología e interés público. El desafío profesional de la Antropología en España. Revista de Antropología Experimental, 12, 7-21