Degree | Type | Year | Semester |
---|---|---|---|
2503710 Geography, Environmental Management and Spatial Planning | OB | 2 | 1 |
There are no prerequisites
Regional planning is one of the three modalities of physical planning and regulation that intervenes in any territory. A modality that had traditionally been little developed in our reality and that has been taking a greater role in the last decades impelled, on the one hand, by the Generalitat of Catalonia - with the development of the of Regional Planning Programme approved in 2004 - and on the other hand, by the conditions of the territory itself – with the consolidation of the metropolitan areas and regions.
The three main goals of the course are:
In short, it is a matter of knowing the motivations of the planning (mainly territorial and urban), becoming familiar with the basic concepts and elements that make it up and the instruments or technical tools used to shape and concretize the planning. It will be done through theoretical classes, examples and current debates (global agendas (SDGs and Urban Agenda), the "new normal", among others) and a work on a practical case of executed planning.
The subject’s course will be taught according to the following agenda:
Block 1: Planning in Theory.
Block 2: Planning in practice.
The course aims to approach and to show simultaneously the two dimensions embedded in planning: the theoretical and the practical. To make this double look possible there would be two kinds of sessions:
Title | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|
Type: Directed | |||
Debates | 4 | 0.16 | 1, 2 |
Oral exposition by the students (study cases) | 12 | 0.48 | 1, 2 |
Theoretical sessions | 30 | 1.2 | 1, 2 |
Type: Supervised | |||
Tutorial | 4 | 0.16 | 2 |
Type: Autonomous | |||
Readings and personal work | 21 | 0.84 | 2 |
Teamwork (study cases) | 60 | 2.4 | 1, 2 |
The course’s final grade will essentially be based on the following three components:
• Written individual work documents that represent 50% of the final grade.
Maximum 4 writing exercises would be proposed along the course (a summary of reading articles, a short essay regarding an ongoing debate or an issue raised in class, a small intervention on a specific concept discussed in class, etc.). Written quality, ability to concretise and synthesize arguments and argumentation capacity will be valued.
• Group case study work that represents 40% of the final grade.
At the beginning of the course, a case study would be proposed for each group (groups of 3 students) and an outline of the contents that will be developed and worked throughout the whole period. The presentations in class of the different parts of the research paper and the partial deliveries will build the final grade. All group members must demonstrate equal work and commitment towards the teamwork. The quality and rigor of the contents will be valued as well as the quality of the presentation, the language used and the graphics.
• Attendance and active participation in class that represents 10% of the final grade.
Attendance at all classes is mandatory. In exceptional cases of missing a class, the student would submit an acceptable justification in writing. Continued absence from class without justification will lead the student to the resit exam (as he / she will not have been able to demonstrate his / her involvement and participation in the study work).
Qualification’s requirements:
a) Having passed written individual work documents with a minimum average grade of 5.
b) Have submitted the case study work with a minimum grade of 5.
Both previous grades will not average between them to pass the subject. Therefore, you must have a minimum grade of5 in both jobs (individual documents and case work in groups).
c) Have participated regularly in the classes.
Grade’s review:
a) The exams and works to review the final grade would be indicated in due time.
b) To qualify for review, you must have participated in the evaluation tests and delivered the materials of the practices in the manner that will be indicated in due time.
c) The maximum grade that can be obtained in the review process is 5.
Not eligible students:
According to UAB regulations, in order to participate in the recovery process, a minimum grade in the average of the subject must have been obtained. This rating will equal or exceed 3.5. (These conditions are adapted to the regulations on the evaluation of the UAB in Article 112. The recovery http://www.uab.cat/doc/Modificacio_normativa_academica_CG120717).
Plagiarism
The copying or plagiarism of material, both in the case of works and in the case of exams, constitute a crime that will be sanctioned with a zero to the activity. In the case of recidivism, the entire subject will be suspended.
Let's remember that a "copy" is considered a work that reproduces all or most of the work of one or the other company / a. "Plagiarism" is the fact of presenting all or part of a text of an author as its own, without mentioning the sources, be on paper or in digital format. See UAB documentation on "plagiarism" at:
http://wuster.uab.es/web_argumenta_obert/unit_20/sot_2_01.html.
Title | Weighting | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
Attendance and active participation in class | 10% | 10 | 0.4 | 1, 2, 3 |
Group case study work | 40% | 4 | 0.16 | 3 |
Written individual work documents | 50% | 5 | 0.2 | 1, 2, 3 |
Romà Pujadas, Jaume Font; “Ordenación y planificación territorial”. Editorial Síntesis.
Manuel Benabent Fernández; “Introducción a la teoria de la planificación territorial”. Secretariado de Publicaciones. Universidad de Sevilla.
Juli Esteban Noguera; “Elementos de Ordenación Urbana”. Edicions UPC. Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya.
Peter Hall; “Urban and Regional Planning”. Routledge.
Patsy Healey; “Collaborative Planning: shaping places in Fragmented societies”. Palgrave-MacMillan.
Scott Campell, Susan Fainstein (ed.); “Planning Theory”. Blackwell Publishers.
Articles and complementary readings for the class debates will be proposed at the beginning of the course.