Assessment

1. Continous

1.1. An oral presentation on a literary book of the period (except those consigned as course readings). A critical commentary on this book should be made for approximately 10 minutes. 5 %

1.2. A reading questionnaire on the five prescriptive books. 10 %

1.3. A review of one of the obligatory reading books. Length: 2100 characters with spaces. 25 %

1.4. A receptive and participative attitude. 10 %

2. Final

2.1. A group work of 2 students: an in-depth interview with a current writer, who will have to be presented in audiovisual format (15 minutes) and subsequent debate. 25 %

2.2. A written test on the theoretical part, in which an open question must be answered on an aspect of the syllabus and also a critical commentary on a fragment of the readings commented. It will also include several brief questions about the group work presented. 25 %

In order to pass the course, the student will have to follow this evaluation point by point. Otherwise, it will be considered NOT EVALUABLE. The student who performs any irregularity (copy, plagiarism, identity theft...) that can lead to a significant variation of the qualification of an evaluation act, will be qualified with 0 in this act of evaluation. In case there are several irregularities, the final grade of the subject will be 0.

Only those students who have a median course of more than 3.5 and less than 5 will be able to participate in the reevaluation. In this case, the student will have to take a written test on the contents of the subject.



Note about the interview

The objectives of an interview with a writer should be, at the very least:

1) to make known the trajectory and the most outstanding constants of the literary work of the person being interviewed;

2) comment in depth on the meaning of theirworks, based on prior documentation, the more exhaustive and detailed the better (reading of works, research on the author, etc.).

Care must be taken to ensure that the presentation is attractive and that the viewing works technically. Once edited, the interviews must be published in a virtual portal in order to recover them and avoid technical problems.

You can interview any active writer who is part of the Associació d'Escriptors en Llengua Catalana (http://www.escriptors.cat/).

You can be inspired by the following journalistic references: Montserrat Roig, Josep Maria Espinàs, Baltasar Porcel or Bernard Pivot. The content, cohesion and coherence of the result will be valued above all.

Qualification criteria

1. Review and oral exposition: capacity of critical deepening, analysis and careful writing/expression.

2. Interventions: participation in the debate, critical readings and relevant consultations.

3. Group work: documentation, depth and coherence of the interview.

4. Written test: capacity for analysis and synthesis, relation of ideas, careful writing.