Degree | Type | Year | Semester |
---|---|---|---|
2502444 Chemistry | OT | 4 | 0 |
There are two types of teaching methodology in this subject, face-to-face and self-learning activities.
Face-to-face activity:
- Classes in the classroom: they will consist of the presentation of the main theoretical concepts that make up the subjects that are the object of the study.
- Exercises in the classroom: Students will have a collection of exercises and / or practical cases proposed by the teacher that will be resolved in the classroom.
Title | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|
Type: Directed | |||
Practical classes in the classroom | 10 | 0.4 | 4, 21, 22, 15, 17, 19, 20, 24, 9, 27 |
Theory | 34 | 1.36 | 2, 22, 5, 6, 7, 10, 11, 3, 23, 8, 25, 24, 27 |
Type: Supervised | |||
Seminars | 7 | 0.28 | 1, 4, 21, 3, 23, 18, 19, 20, 9, 27 |
Type: Autonomous | |||
Autonomous study | 60 | 2.4 | 1, 14, 2, 4, 21, 22, 5, 6, 7, 15, 16, 10, 11, 3, 23, 17, 18, 19, 8, 25, 20, 24, 9, 26, 27 |
Type of activity: Self-learning | 11 | 0.44 | 1, 14, 4, 21, 22, 15, 16, 13, 3, 23, 17, 18, 19, 20, 24, 9, 28, 26, 27 |
The evaluation process follows the principle of continuous evaluation. For the evaluation of the subject, they will be carried out:
(1) Two midterm exams on the dates indicated by the faculty, each one corresponding, approximately, to half of the syllabus of the subject. Midterm exams are individual. Each midterm exam will have two parts, the first one will consist of several questions related to the theory part of the subject (it may be type test and may also include some short questions). In the second part, the student will have to solve some problems. The theory part will be worth between 40 and 60% of the partial mark, and the part of problems between 40-60%. To be able to make an average for the final mark, the qualification of the midterm exam must be equal to or greater than 4.0. The final mark of these two tests will have a weighting of 70% in the final grade.
(2) Presentation of works. These works will be carried out in groups and the maximum number of participants will be set prior to each work. The overall mark of this work will have a weighting of 20% in the final grade.
(3) Presentation of a summary of each conference or seminar given. This summary will be written individually. The global mark of these abstracts will have a 10% weighting in the final grade.
The final grade is the sum of the weighted notes of the three previous items. To pass the subject, students must obtain an average of 5.0 or more.
Attendance at seminars or conferences is mandatory.
If the proposed works or the summaries of the conferences are not presented, the student will be described as "not evaluable", regardless of the mark of the midterm exams.
The student who does not pass the normal evaluation will have an extraordinary evaluation, in the dates determined by the faculty.
Only the mark referred to in paragraph (1) can be recovered. The marks and weightings of sections (2) and (3) will be the same as before. The student will have to retake each of the midterm exams with a mark less than 4.0. In the event that the final grade is less than 5.0, and the partial ones have a mark greater than 4.0, the student may decide to take the extraordinary evaluation of both midterm exams or only the extraordinary evaluation of that exam with the lowest mark.
The mark of the retaken exam will replace the previous one in the calculation of the global grade. To be able to make an average for the final grade, the qualification of the partial examination must be equal to or greater than 4.0.
Title | Weighting | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
Cooperative activities | 20 | 15 | 0.6 | 1, 14, 21, 22, 15, 16, 13, 3, 23, 17, 18, 19, 25, 20, 24, 9, 28, 26, 27 |
Midterm exam I | 35 | 3 | 0.12 | 1, 2, 4, 22, 5, 6, 7, 16, 3, 18, 19, 25, 20, 9, 27 |
Midterm exam II | 35 | 3 | 0.12 | 1, 4, 22, 16, 10, 11, 3, 23, 18, 12, 19, 8, 25, 20, 9, 27 |
Seminars or lectures in the classroom | 10 | 7 | 0.28 | 1, 14, 21, 15, 16, 13, 3, 17, 18, 19, 20, 24, 28, 26, 27 |
Although it does not follow the order of the program and the regulations referred to are not the current ones, it can be considered a textbook with the basic content of the subject: R. Compañó Beltrán, A. Ríos Castro; Garantía de la calidad en los Laboratorios analíticos ". Editorial Síntesis. Madrid (2002).
Review and update of a classic textbook on the subject. The UAB has the electronic version of the book that is free to access: E. Prichard, V. Barwick; Quality assurance in analytical chemistry. Wiley (2007).
Tools for the use in statistical tests, linear regression, validation of methods, control charts, interlaboratory exercises, etc. There is an electronic version available at the UAB: M. Reichenbächer, J.W. Einax; Challenges in Analytical Quality Assurance. Springer (2011).