Degree | Type | Year | Semester |
---|---|---|---|
2500257 Criminology | OT | 4 | 0 |
Do not apply. The subject is part of the two grade mentions.
The methodological approach of the subject starts from focusing the activity of the process on the student's learning. In order to allow the achievement of this principle, the student should be active and autonomous throughout the process, being the mission of the teacher to assist him in this task. In this sense, teachers will: 1) support students at all times by providing the information and resources necessary for learning, 2) ensure autonomous learning of students by proposing different learning activities (individual and group, theoretical and practical) under the principle of variety of methods.
In this approach, the subject is structured, in its design and development, in the type of teaching-learning activities that we detail and specify below:
Activity |
Hours |
Methodology |
Learning outcomes |
Lectures |
19,5 |
Although it is a type of activity in which the protagonism fall mainly on the professor, the active participation of the students will be encouraged, especially sharing the learning that has been acquired or is being acquired. Practical activities, using problem-based learning, will be carried out individually or in groups. |
E21.02, E22.01, E28.02, T05.00 |
Seminars |
19,5 |
They allow to work in medium groups (25 persons approximately), divided in small groups (3-5people) where the individual work is reinforced and complemented. At the same time, it is the right space for debating and receiving personal attention. Students will do tasks similar that those done in the professionals filed. Students will analyze a real case of a prevention program. |
E21.02, E22.01, E28.02, T01.00, T02.00, T03.00 |
There will be a detailed program of all activities at the beginning of the course.
Classes will start on time.
Title | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|
Type: Directed | |||
Presential in large group: theory and case analysis (individual with group discussion). | 19.5 | 0.78 | 2, 5, 4, 6, 11, 12, 10 |
Seminars: Practice analysi and evaluation design of a prevention program (group activity) | 19.5 | 0.78 | 2, 5, 4, 6, 7, 1, 11, 12, 13, 10 |
Type: Autonomous | |||
Reading of the dossiers-didactic units; Repository of cases worked; Brief reporting and analysis. Realization of a design and evaluation report of a prevention program. | 106 | 4.24 | 3, 2, 5, 4, 6, 7, 1, 12, 13, 10 |
Evidences for evaluation
1. Group-specific practices (design of the planning of the evaluation of a program)
2. Theoretical-practical exams (regarding theoretical-practical knowledge in relation to the contents and objectives of the course)
3. Individual or group oral presentation (analysis of one or more existing plans, programs or projects).
Group work
The group design of a program has a formative purpose from the point of view of its evaluation, since the group can revise the work done based on the feedback received for the written assignments and oral presentations.
Resit
Reassessment will imply the correction of the non-acquired learning, or the incorporation of new evidences on the part of the student, showing the attainment of the skills of the course
Other relevant aspects
Students will have the opportunity to improve their assignments that do not evidence the acquisition of the competences of the course. Only students who have done the work in the first instance will have the opportunity to repeat it.
-A minimum of 80% of attendance to classes is a requirement to be evaluated. Only absences for illness or similar reasons are justifiable.
-Cheating in one exam will conduct to a fail mark (0), losing the right of reassessment. Plagiarism in assignments will conduct to a 0 mark and failure of the course will be considered.
Title | Weighting | Hours | ECTS | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
Exam about the theoretical and practical contents | 50 % | 5 | 0.2 | 3, 2, 5, 8, 4, 6, 9, 1, 12, 10 |
Follow-up of evaluation planning designed by the students; Correction of the final program (written report presentation); Group activity | 30% | 0 | 0 | 2, 5, 4, 6, 7, 1, 12, 13, 10 |
Oral presentation of the evaluation planning of a program or project | 20% | 0 | 0 | 2, 5, 4, 6, 7, 1, 11, 12, 13, 10 |
General references
Agencia Estatal de Evaluación de la Calidad (2010) Fundamentos de evaluación de políticas públicas. Madrid: Ministerio de Política Territorial y Administración Pública. Retrieved from: http://www.aeval.es/comun/pdf/evaluaciones/Fundamentos_de_evaluacion.pdf).
Banco Mundial (2004) Seguimiento y evaluación: instrumentos, métodos y enfoques. Washington: Banco Mundial.
Comas, D. (2008). Manual de evaluación para políticas, planes, programas y actividades de juventud. Madrid: Observatorio de la Juventud en España. Servicio de Documentación y Estudios. Retrieved from: http://xuventude.xunta.es/uploads/Manual_de_evaluacin_para_polticas_planes_programas_y_actividades_de_juventud.pdf
Frühling, H. (2012). La eficacia de las políticas públicas de seguridad ciudadana en América Latina y el Caribe. Cómo medirla y como mejorarla. Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo (BID). Retrieved from https://publications.iadb.org/publications/spanish/document/La-eficacia-de-las-pol%C3%ADticas-p%C3%BAblicas-de-seguridad-ciudadana-en-Am%C3%A9rica-Latina-y-el-Caribe-Como-medirla-y-como-mejorarla.pdf
Loinaz, I. (2017). Manual de evaluación del riesgo de violencia: metodología y ámbitos de aplicación. Madrid: Edcs. Pirámide
Martínez Mediano, Catalina (2017). Evaluación de programas. Madrid: UNED
Nirenberg, O.;Brawerman, J. y Ruíz, V. (2000) Evaluar parala transformación. Innovaciones en la evaluación de programas y proyectos sociales, Buenos Aires: Paidos
Osuna, J.L., y Márquez, C. (Drts.) (2002). Guía para la evaluación de políticas públicas. Sevilla: Instituto de Desarrollo Económico. Retrieved from: http://siare.clad.org/siare/innotend/evaluacion/manualeval.pdf.
Tejada, J. y Giménez, V. (Coord.) (2001). Formación de formadores. Escenario institucional, Madrid: Thomson
Specific references
It will be presented across the development of the program taking into account the interest of the students.
(NOTE: The compulsory bibliography will be defined at the beginning of the course)